This article presents progressive failure analysis of double-notched carbon/epoxy composite laminates with different scales. A numerical analysis strategy based on material property degradation method (MPDM) and cohesive elements (CE) is developed to model progressive failure of scaled double-notched composite laminates, where the material property degradation method is used to model the intralaminar failure and the cohesive elements are employed to account for the delamination at the interfaces. Different failure theories are considered in the material property degradation method–cohesive element approach and a comparative study of these failure theories is presented. The mesh dependency of the material property degradation method–cohesive element approach is investigated with different notch and element types for the double-notched composite laminates. Size scaling effects are also studied by traditional fracture models and the material property degradation method–cohesive element approach, significantly revealing a trend in strength reduction of notched composites with increasing specimen size. The predictions are compared with the experimental results and reasonably good agreement is observed.
ASTM D3039/D3039M-08 (2008). Tensile Properties for Polymer Matrix Composite Materials, In: Annual Book of ASTM standards: Composite Materials, Section 15.09. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
2.
ASTM D5379/D5379M-05. (2005). Standard Test Method for Shear Properties of Composite Materials by the V-Notched Beam Method, In: Annual book of ASTM standards: Composite Materials, Section 15.03. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
3.
AwerbuchJMadhukarMS (1985). Notched Strength of Composite Laminates: Predictions and Experiments—A Review. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 4: 3–159.
4.
BarenblattGI (1962). The Mathematical Theory of Equilibrium Cracks in Brittle Failure. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 7: 55–129.
5.
Camanho, P.P. and Davila, C.G. (2003). Analysis of the Effects of Residual Strains and Defects on Skin/Stiffener Debonding Using Decohesion Elements, SDM Conference, Norfolk, VA.
6.
Camanho, P.P., Davila, C.G. and Ambur, D.R. (2001). Numerical Simulation of Delamination Growth in Composite Materials, NASA-TP-211041.
DanielIM (2006). Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2nd edn. New York, Oxford University Press.
9.
DanielIM (2007). Failure of Composite Materials. Strain, 43: 4–12.
10.
DugdaleDS (1960). Yielding of Steel Sheets Containing Slits. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 8: 100–104.
11.
GudmundsonP (2000). Micromechanically Based Constitutive Models for Damage Evolution in Composite Laminates. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 9: 29–39.
12.
HaSKJinKKHuangY (2008). Micro-Mechanics of Failure (MMF) for Continuous Fiber Reinforced Composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 42: 1873–1895.
13.
Haj-AliR (2009). Cohesive Micromechanics: A New Approach for Progressive Damage Modeling in Laminated Composites. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 18: 691–719.
14.
HallettSRWisnomMR (2006a). Experimental Investigation of Progressive Damage and the Effect of Layup in Notched Tensile Tests. Journal of Composite Materials, 40: 119–141.
15.
HallettSRWisnomMR (2006b). Numerical Investigation of Progressive Damage and the Effect of Layup in Notched Tensile Tests. Journal of Composite Materials, 40: 1229–1245.
16.
HashinZ (1980). Failure Criteria for Unidirectional Fiber Composites. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 47: 329–334.
17.
HintonMJKaddourASSodenPD (2002). A Comparison of the Predictive Capabilities of Current Failure Theories for Composite Laminates, Judged against Experimental Evidence. Composites Science and Technology, 62: 1725–1797.
HouJPPetrinicNRuizCHallettSR (2000). Prediction of Impact Damage in Composite Plates. Composites Science and Technology, 60: 273–281.
20.
IcardiULocattoSStudentGLongoA (2007). Assessment of Recent Theories for Predicting Failure of Composite Laminates. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 60: 76–86.
21.
JainJRGoshS (2009). Damage Evolution in Composites with Homogenization-based Continuum Damage Mechanics Model. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 18: 533–568.
22.
Jenkins, C.F. (1920). Report on Materials of Construction Used in Aircraft and Aircraft Engines, Great Britain Aeronautical Research Committee.
23.
KortschotMTBeaumontPWR (1990a). Damage Mechanics of Composite Materials: I—Measurements of Damage and Strength. Composites Science and Technology, 39: 289–301.
24.
KortschotMTBeaumontPWR (1990b). Damage Mechanics of Composite Materials: II—A Damaged-Based Notched Strength Model. Composites Science and Technology, 39: 303–326.
25.
KortschotMTBeaumontPWRAshbyMF (1991a). Damage Mechanics of Composite Materials: III— Prediction of Damage Growth and Notched Strength. Composites Science and Technology, 40: 147–165.
26.
KortschotMTBeaumontPWR (1991b). Damage Mechanics of Composite Materials: IV—The Effect of Lay-Up on Damage Growth and Notched Strength. Composites Science and Technology, 40: 167–179.
LadevèzePAllixODeüJFLévêqueD (2000). A Mesomodel for Localisation and Damage Computation in Laminates. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 183: 105–122.
29.
LiuCJNijhofAHJErnstLJMarissenR (2008). Modeling Failure Interaction in Notched Cross-ply Laminates. Journal of Composite Materials, 42: 2175–2193.
MaaRHChengJH (2002). A CDM-Based Failure Model for Predicting Strength of Notched Composite Laminates. Composites Part B - Engineering, 33: 479–489.
32.
OchiaiSPetersPWM (1982). Effects of Notch Length, Specimen Thickness, Ply Thickness and Type of Defect on the Fracture Behaviour of Angle-Ply Graphite-Epoxy Composites. Journal of Materials Science, 17: 2324–2336.
33.
OkabeTTakedaN (2002). Size Effect on Tensile Strength of Unidirectional CFRP Composites—Experiment and Simulation. Composites Science and Technology, 62: 2053–2064.
34.
ShenFLeeKHTayTE (2001). Modeling Delamination Growth in Laminated Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 61: 1239–1251.
35.
SunXSTanVBCTayTE (2011). Micromechanics-Based Progressive Failure Analysis of Fibre-Reinforced Composites with Non-Iterative Element-Failure Method. Computers & Structures, 89: 1103–1116.
36.
TanSC (1991). A Progressive Failure Model for Composite Laminates Containing Openings. Journal of Composite Materials, 25: 556–577.
37.
TanSCNuismerRJ (1989). A Theory for Progressive Matrix Cracking in Composite Laminates. Journal of Composite Materials, 23: 1029–1047.
38.
TanSCPerezJ (1993). Progressive Failure of Laminated Composites with a Hole Under Compressive Loading. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 12: 1043–1057.
39.
TayTELiuGTanVBCSunXSPhamDC (2008). Progressive Failure Analysis of Composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 42: 1921–1966.
40.
TayTEShenFLeeKHScaglioneADi SciuvaM (1999). Mesh Design in Finite Element Analysis of Post-Buckled Delamination in Composite Laminates. Composite Structures, 47: 603–611.
Waddoups, M.E. (1967). Advanced Composite Material Mechanics for Design and Stress Analysis, General Dynamics, Fort Worth Division Report FZM-4763, Fort Worth, TX.
46.
WisnomMR (1999). Size Effects in the Testing of Fibre-Composite Materials. Composites Science and Technology, 59: 1937–1957.
47.
WisnomMRAtkinsonJW (1997). Reduction in Tensile and Flexural Strength of Unidirectional Glass Fibre-Epoxy with Increasing Specimen Size. Composite Structures, 38: 405–411.
48.
WisnomMRChangFK (2000). Modeling of Splitting and Delamination in Notched Cross-ply Laminates. Composites Science and Technology, 60: 2849–2856.
49.
YangQDCoxB (2005). Cohesive Models for Damage Evolution in Laminated Composites. International Journal of Fracture, 133: 107–137.
