The effects of incorporating core shell polymer (CSP) particles within interply interfaces on the impact response of CFRP prepreg laminates are investigated. The impact tests were conducted on samples without and with CSP particles into the ply interfaces. The loads versus time curves were examined to determine the impact response and the associated energy absorption by the laminates were studied. The results indicate that both, the peak load of the laminates improved by 41% and damping index (DI) reduced by 90% with the dispersion of 51 g/m2 of CSP particles within the prepreg ply interfaces of the laminates. It was noted that the CSP particles shielded the composites from the initial severity of impact. The energy absorbing mechanisms altered the supercritical response of the laminate to subcritical due to increase in the elastic energy stored within the laminates with CSP particles thereby changing the energy absorption modes. It was observed from macroscopic observations and SEM images of the damage sites that the damage mechanism and patterns changed and the extent of damage reduced with the addition of CSP particles.
AdamsD.F.MillerA.K. (1975). An Analysis of the Impact Behavior of Hybrid Composite Materials. Materials Science and Engineering, 19: 245–260.
2.
AktaşM.AtasC.IçtenB.M.KarakuzuR. (2009). An Experimental Investigation of the Impact Response of Composite Laminates. Composite Structures, 87: 307–313.
3.
BledzkiA.K.GassanJ.KesslerA. (1999). Loss Energy of Composite Materials. Part II: Impact Loading. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 27: 36–41.
4.
CantwellW.J.MortonJ. (1989). Comparision of the Low and High Velocity Impact Response of CFRP. Composites, 20: 545–551.
5.
CantwellW.J.MortonJ. (1991). The Impact Resistance of Composite Materials - A Review. Composites, 22: 347–362.
6.
DelfosseD.PoursartipA. (1997). Energy-based Approach to Impact Damage in CFRP Laminates. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 28: 647–655.
DransfieldK.BaillieC.MaiY.W. (1994). Improving the Delamination Resistance of CFRP by Stitching - A Review. Composites Science and Technology, 50: 305–317.
9.
FeraboliP. (2006). Some Recommendations for Characterization of Composite Panels by Means of Drop Tower Impact Testing. Journal of Aircraft, 43: 1710–1718.
10.
FeraboliP.KedwardK.T. (2004). Enhanced Evaluation of the Low-Velocity Impact Response of Composite Plates. AIAA Journal, 42: 2143–2152.
11.
FeraboliP.KedwardK.T. (2006). A New Composite Structure Impact Performance Assessment Program. Composites Science and Technology, 66: 1336–1347.
12.
Ghasemi NejhadM.N.Parvizi-MajidiA. (1990). Impact Behaviour and Damage Tolerance of Woven Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites. Composites, 21: 155–168.
13.
GilbertE.N.HayesB.S.SeferisJ.C. (2003). Interlayer Toughened Unidirectional Carbon Prepreg Systems: Effect of Preformed Particle Morphology. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 34: 245–252.
14.
HosurM.V.ChowdhuryF.JeelaniS. (2007). Low-Velocity Impact Response and Ultrasonic NDE of Woven Carbon/Epoxy-Nanoclay Nanocomposites. Journal of Composite Materials, 41: 2195–2212.
15.
IqbalK.KhanS.U.MunirA.KimJ.K. (2009). Impact Damage Resistance of CFRP with Nanoclay-Filled Epoxy Matrix. Composites Science and Technology, 69: 1949–1957.
16.
KimJ.K.MacKayD.B.MaiY.-W. (1993). Drop-Weight Impact Damage Tolerance of CFRP with Rubber-Modified Epoxy Matrix. Composites, 24: 485–494.
17.
KimJ.BaillieC.PohJ.MaiY.W. (1992). Fracture Toughness of CFRP with Modified Epoxy Resin Matrices. Composites Science and Technology, 43: 283–297.
18.
KimJ.MaiY.W. (1991). Effects of Interfacial Coating and Temperature on the Fracture Behaviours of Unidirectional Kevlar and Carbon Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Resin Composites. Journal of Materials Science, 26: 4702–4720.
19.
Kim, J.K. and Robertson, R.E. (1993). Preparation of Poly(Butylene Terephthalate)-Toughened Epoxies, In: Riew, C.K. and Kinloch, A.J. (ed.), Toughened Plastics I, Oxford Uuniversity Press, New York: American Chemical Society, pp. 427–449.
20.
KostopoulosV.BaltopoulosA.KarapappasP.VavouliotisA.PaipetisA. (2010). Impact and After-Impact Properties of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Composites Enhanced with Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. Composites Science and Technology, 70: 553–563.
21.
LeachD.C.MooreD.R. (1985). Toughness of Aromatic Polymer Composites Reinforced with Carbon Fibres. Composites Science and Technology, 23: 131–161.
22.
MangalgiriP.D. (1999). Composite Materials for Aerospace Applications. Bulletin of Materials Science, 22: 657–664.
23.
MouritzA.P. (2007). Review of Z-Pinned Composite Laminates. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 38: 2383–2397.
24.
Pearson, R.A. (1993). Toughening Epoxies Using Rigid Thermoplastic Particles - A Review, In: Riew, C.K. and Kinloch, A.J. (ed.), Toughened Plastics I, Oxford University Press, New York: American Chemical Society, pp. 405–425.
25.
RichardsonM.O.W.WisheartM.J. (1996). Review of Low-Velocity Impact Properties of Composite Materials. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 27: 1123–1131.
26.
SchoeppnerG.A.AbrateS. (2000). Delamination Threshold Loads for Low Velocity Impact on Composite Laminates. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 31: 903–915.
27.
SohnM.S.HuX.Z.KimJ.K.WalkerL. (2000). Impact Damage Characterization of Carbon Fibre/Epoxy Composites with Multi-Layer Reinforcement. Composites Part B: Engineering, 31: 681–691.
28.
StraitL.H.KarasekM.L.AmateauM.F. (1992). Effects of Stacking Sequence on the Impact Resistance of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Toughened Epoxy Laminates. Journal of Composite Materials, 26: 1725–1740.
29.
WalkerL.SohnM.S.HuX.Z. (2002). Improving Impact Resistance of Carbon-Fibre Composites Through Interlaminar Reinforcement. Composites - Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 33: 893–902.
