Distributed Leadership in Public Primary Schools of Arsi Zone: Teachers’ and Principals’ Perception in Focus

Abstract

This concurrent mixed-methods study examined teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of distributed leadership in Arsi Zone public primary schools. A total of 463 participants (73 principals, 272 teachers, 16 supervisors, 102 students) from 34 schools across 8 Woredas were selected through multi-stage sampling. Data collected via questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions were analyzed using SPSS 21. Findings indicated overall positive perceptions, with teachers markedly more favorable than principals. Gender differences appeared only in leadership-related aspects, while qualification and experience showed no significant effects. Qualitative results supported the quantitative findings, emphasizing that distributed leadership enhances effective school practices and collaboration.

Keywords

distributed leadership focus group discussion perception principals public primary schools teachers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adıgüzelli

(2016). Examining the relationship between distributed leadership and organizational trust according to opinions of teachers. Education and Science, 41(185), 269–280. ¹ https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6218

Ajay

K. J.

Hans

J. J.

(2014). Conceptualizing and implementing the distributed leadership practices in Indian organizations. Journal of Management Development, 33(3), 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2012-0154

Akdemir

ÖA

Ayik

(2012). The impact of distributed leadership behaviors of school principals on the organizational commitment of teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12B), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051402

Aliakbari

Sadeghi

(2014). Iranian Teachers’ perceptions of teacher leadership practices in schools.². Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 576–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213510500

Amodu

L. A.

(2006). Perception: A determinant for effective communication. SOPHIA: An African Journal of Philosophy, 9(1), 148–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.09.00. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272336681_Perception_A_Determinant_for_Effective_Communication

Arsi Zone Education Office . (2022). Annual Educational Statistics. Unpublished Manuscript. Asella, Ethiopia: Arsi Zone Education Office.

Ashenafi

(2019). Assessment of relation between distributed leadership practices and the role of principals in preparatory and secondary schools’ effectiveness of Gondar City Administration, Ethiopia. Research Journal of Social Science and Management, 8(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/evj.v23i1.1. http://213.55.79.198/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/2277/7711-18604-1-PB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Asrat

(2017). The practice and challenges of distributed leadership at some selected primary schools of Debark district: Ethiopia. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioral Science, 20(3), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s127177. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/144777025.pdf

Bai

Serena

(2005). Tests for skewness, kurtosis, and normality for time series data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 23(1), 49–60.

10.

Balnaves

Caputi

(2001). Introduction to quantitative research methods: An investigative approach. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209380

11.

Belayneh

(2020). A study on the practice of distributive leadership in Debre Markos Town government secondary schools, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2020.v05.i06.022

12.

Botha

R. J.

Triegaardt

P. K.

(2015). The role of distributed leadership in functional South African schools. Journal of Social Sciences, 43(3), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2015.11893438

13.

Botha

R. K.

Triegaardt

P. K.

(2016). The perceptions of South African classroom teachers with regard to the role of distributed leadership in school improvement. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(3), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2016.11890498

14.

Busetto

Wick

Gumbinger

(2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurology Research and Practice, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z

15.

Bush

Glover

(2014). Leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680

16.

Carreño

I. G.

(2017). Principals’ perceptions of the practice of distributed leadership: A quantitative study. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, 3(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v13.n1.2018.10615

17.

Creswell

J. W.

(2016). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage.

18.

Dartel

(2013). Distributed leadership in practice. A descriptive analysis of distributed leadership in European schools. European School Heads Association. http://www.esha.org/

19.

Ertürk

Nartgün

(2019). The relationship between teacher perceptions of distributed leadership and schools as learning organizations. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.596918

20.

Eryilmaz

Hernandez

A. S.

(2023). Is distributed leadership universal? A cross-cultural, comparative approach across 40 countries: An alignment optimization approach. Education in Science, 13(2), 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020218

21.

Esaw

Ayalew

(2021). Distributed educational leadership in the private schools of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Perceptions, practices, challenges and opportunities. Organizational Leadership & Administration, 25(3), 1–21. https://www.proquest.com/openview/dd6f06ca71ae301753ad7c9c9f60cd90/1?pq_origsite=gscholar&cbl=38741

22.

Gay

L. R.

Mills

G. E.

Airasian

P. W.

(2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson Higher Ed.

23.

Gibb

C. A.

(1954). Leadership. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 877–917). Addison-Wesley.

24.

Gronn

(2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0263211X000283006 https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X000283006

25.

Hallinger

Murphy

J. F.

(2020). Distributed leadership in schools: A research synthesis. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.01.009

26.

Hancock

G. R.

Mueller

R. O.

(Eds.). (2010). The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861554.

27.

Harris

(2009). Distributed leadership. Springer Press.

28.

Hartley

W. D.

(2007). The emergence of distributed leadership in education: Why now? British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00371.x

29.

Kilicoglu

(2018). Understanding democratic and distributed leadership: How democratic leadership of school principals related to distributed leadership in schools? Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2018.150

30.

Kiral

Suçiçeği

(2017). The relationship between teachers’ perception of school principals’ instructional leadership and organizational commitment level. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, 6(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1254691.pdf . DOI: 10.1108/JEA-03-2017-0025

31.

Kondakci

Zayim

Beycioglu

Sincar

Ugurlu

(2016). The mediating roles of internal context variables in the relationship between distributed leadership perceptions and continuous change behaviors of public school teachers.⁴. Educational Studies, 42(4), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1206462

32.

Law

S. P.

Chan

K. L.

(2017). The impact of teacher-student relationship quality on academic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 450–462.

33.

Lodico

M. G.

Spaulding

D. T.

Voegtle

K. H.

(2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. http://library.lol/main/9FAE23B336965A34A45FD2FF0AC41D60

34.

Mesfin

(2019). Practice and challenges of distributed leadership at public secondary schools of Dessie City Administration. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 7(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3386936. www.ajouronline.com

35.

Mills

G. E.

Gay

L. R.

(2019). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (12th ed.). Pearson Education. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/educational-research-competencies-for-analysis-and-applications/P200000001511/9780136941095

36.

Mullick

Sharma

Deppeler

(2012). School teachers’ perception about distributed leadership practices for inclusive education in primary schools in Bangladesh. School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organization, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2012.723615

37.

Murphey

Moss

Wiener

(2005). Women in educational leadership finding common ground. Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, 169(4). http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jwel/169

38.

Nichols

J. D.

Nichols

G. T.

(2014). Perceptions of school leaders: Exploring school climate data based on principal gender and student achievement. Advancing Women in Leadership, 34(2), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.21423/awlj-v34.a119. http://advancingwomen.com/awl/awl_wordpress/

39.

Rachel

Kate

(2018). Distributed leadership in ECE: perceptions and practices. An International Research Journal, 41(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2018.1539702

40.

Shimelis

(2018). Practices and challenges of distributed leadership in secondary schools of Aksum Town, Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(7). DOI: 10.7176/JEP/9-7-25

41.

Spillane

J. P.

(2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass. https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=768106

42.

Spillane

J. P.

(2012). Distributed leadership. John Wiley & Sons.

43.

Tashi

(2015). A quantitative analysis of distributed leadership in practice: Teachers’ perception of their engagement in four dimensions of distributed leadership in Bhutanese schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(winter), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9387-4

44.

Torrance

(2013). Distributed leadership: Challenging five generally held assumptions. School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organization, 33(4), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.813463

45.

Torres

D. G.

(2017). Distributed leadership and teacher job satisfaction in Singapore. Journal of Educational Administration, 55. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2016-0140

46.

Wan

S. W.

Law

E. H.

Chan

K. K.

(2017). Teachers’ perception of distributed leadership in Hong Kong primary schools. School Leadership & Management, 38(1), 102–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1371689

47.

World Economic Forum . (2021). Global Gender Gap Report: Insight Report. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-gender-gap-report-2021/

48.

Yamane

(1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.09 MB