Principals’ responsibilities have escalated in quantity and complexity. Mandates to increase student achievement and improve school grades overwhelm one person. Hence, principals are obliged to enlist teachers to serve in leadership roles. This research sought to determine whether there is a relationship between distributed leadership and teacher affective commitment. One hypothesis, null and alternative, was formulated, and data were collected from 230 teachers. Results revealed that distributed leadership correlated with teachers’ affective commitment.
BakkerA. BAlbrechtS. L.LeiterM. P. (2011). Work engagement: Further reflections on the state of play. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 74-88.
2.
BoldenR. (2011) Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251-269. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x
BurkeC. S.FioreS. M.SalasE. (2003). The role of shared cognition in enabling shared leadership and team adaptability. In PearceC. L.CongerJ. A. (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 103-122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
BushT, (2013). Distributed leadership: The model of choice in the 21st century. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41, 543-544. doi:10.1177/1741143213489497
6.
BushT.GloverD. (2012). Distributed leadership in action: Leading high-performing leadership teams in English schools. School Leadership & Management, 32(1), 21-36. doi:10.1080/13632434.2011.642354
7.
ChoiS. B.TranT. B. H.ParkB. I. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality, 43, 931-944. doi:10.2224/sbp.2015.43.6.931
8.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2008). Educational leadership policy standards: 2008. Washington, DC: Author.
9.
DeeJ. R.HenkinA. B.SingletonC. A. (2006). Organizational commitment of teachers in urban schools: Examining the effects of team structures. Urban Education, 41, 603-627. doi:10.1177/0042085906292512
10.
De LimaJ. A. (2008). Department networks and distributed leadership in schools. School Leadership & Management, 28, 159-187.
11.
DeMatthewD. (2014). Principal and teacher collaboration: An exploration of distributed leadership in professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 2(2), 176-206. doi:10.4471/ijelm.2014.16
12.
DevosD.TuytensM.HulpiaH. (2014). Teachers’ organizational commitment: Examining the mediating effects of distributed leadership. American Journal of Education, 120, 205-231.
13.
GronnP. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451.
14.
HarrisA. (2007). Distributed leadership: Conceptual confusion and empirical reticence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10, 315-325.
15.
HarrisA. (2011) Distributed leadership: implications for the role of the principal. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 7-17. doi.org/10.1108/02621711211190961
HarrisA.SpillaneJ. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Education, 22, 31-34. doi:10.1177/0892020607085623
18.
HartleyD. (2007). The emergence of distributed leadership in education: Why now?British Journal of Educational Studies, 55, 202-214. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/4620553
19.
HoyW. K.MiskelC. G. (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
20.
HulpiaH.DevosG. (2009). Exploring the link between distributed leadership and job satisfaction of school leaders. Educational Studies, 35, 153-171. doi:10.1080/03055690802648739
21.
HulpiaH.DevosGRosseelY.VlerickP. (2012). Dimensions of distributed leadership and the impact on teachers’ organizational commitment: A study in secondary education. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 1745-1784. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00917.x
22.
IngersollR. (2006). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
IngersollR.MayH. (2012). The magnitude, destinations and determinants of mathematics and science teacher turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 435-464.
24.
JohnstonM. P. (2015). Distributed leadership theory for investigating teacher librarian leadership. School Libraries Worldwide, 21(2), 39-57.
25.
KafkaJ. (2009). The principalship in historical perspective. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 318-330.
26.
KarpS. (2014). Jumping the ship. Catalyst in Depth, 25(3), 4-7.
27.
KrejcieR. V.MorganD. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
28.
LeithwoodK.DayC.SammonsP.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham, England: National College for School Leadership.
29.
LiouS. (2008). An analysis of the concept of organizational commitment. Nursing Forum, 43(3), 116-125. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00103.x
30.
LouisK. S.LeithwoodK.WalstromK.AndersonS. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
31.
LouisK. S.WahlstomK. L.MichlinM.GordonM.ThomasE.LeithwoodK. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
MacBeathJ. (2005). Leadership as distributed: A matter of practice. School Leadership & Management, 25(4), 349-366.
33.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
MeyerJ. P.StanleyD. J.HerscovitchL.TopolnytskyL. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
35.
MollerJ.EggenA. B. (2005). Team leadership in upper secondary education. School Leadership & Management, 25, 331-347.
36.
MowdayR. (1998). Reflections on the study and relevance of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 8, 387-401.
37.
National Education Association. (2008). Changing role of school leadership. Washington, DC: Author.
NehmehR. (2009). What is organizational commitment, why should managers want it in their workforce and is there any cost effective way to secure it?Montreux, Switzerland: Swiss Management University.
40.
Prather-JonesB. (2011). How school administrators influence the retention of teachers of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. The Clearing House, 84, 1-8. doi:10.1080/00098655.2010.489387.
41.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2007). Independent study into school leadership. London, England: Author.
42.
Professional Association of Georgia Educators. (2006). Distributed leadership: An evolving view of school leadership. Atlanta, GA: Author.
43.
RitchieR.WoodsP. A. (2007). Degrees of distribution: Towards an understanding of variations in the nature of distributed leadership in schools. School Leadership & Management, 27, 363-381.
44.
SchlichteJ.YsselN.MerblerJ. (2005). Pathways to burnout: Case studies in teacher isolation and alienation. Preventing School Failure, 50, 35-40.
45.
SpillaneJ. P.HalversonR.DiamondJ. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 3-34. doi:10.1080/0022027032000106726
46.
SpillaneJ. P.ShererJ. Z. (2004, April). A distributed perspective on school leadership: Leadership practice as stretched over people and place. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Association, San Diego, CA.
47.
SpilmanC. E. (1995). Transforming and urban school. Educational Leadership, 53(4), 34-39.
48.
StrongeJ. H.RichardH. B.CatanoN. (2008). Qualities of effective principals. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
49.
ThibodeauxA. K.LabatM. B.LeeD. E.LabatC. A. (2015). The effects of leadership and high stakes testing on teacher retention. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 19, 227-249.
50.
UrickA. M. (2012). To what extent do typologies of school leaders across the U. S. predict teacher attrition? A multilevel latent class analysis of principals and teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at San Antonio.
51.
VandenbergheC.TremblayM. (2008). The role of pay satisfaction and organizational commitment in turnover intentions: A two-sample study. Journal of Business Psychology, 22, 275-286. doi:10.100/s10869-008-0-63-3
52.
WuV.ShortP. M. (1996). The relationship of empowerment to teacher job commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 23, 85-91.
