STEAM education (or simply referred to below as “STEAM”) has already garnered the attention of scholars and policymakers worldwide. Several governments around the world have started integrating STEAM into their educational systems. The primary aim of this study is to examine the teaching practices in the implementation of STEAM education within the educational context of Kazakhstan. This research utilizes qualitative research methods, mainly interviews and observations. The research findings discovered several advantages and disadvantages. The advantages included the development of competencies such as creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and collaborative teamwork. Meanwhile, the disadvantages included a shortage of proficient STEAM instructors, insufficient time and resources, limited collaborative opportunities, and the absence of a formal STEAM curriculum. This research contributes to the global academic discourse by proposing the integration of STEAM education elements into the established state curriculum, by leveraging STEAM as elective subjects or supplementary extracurricular activities.
AguileraD.Ortiz-RevillaJ. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
2.
AnandaL. R.RahmawatiY.KhairiF. (2023). Critical thinking skills of chemistry students by integrating design thinking with STEAM-PjBL. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1938
3.
AnindyaF. A. U.WusqoI. U. (2020). The influence of PjBL-STEAM model toward students’ problem-solving skills on light and optical instruments topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(4), 042054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042054
4.
BartholomewS.YauneyJ.WuthrichV.WolfleyK.ElyaE.RichP.ShumwayS.WrightG. (2023). Digital storyboards: Making CS elementary. In 2023 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ietc57902.2023.10152087
5.
BelbaseS.MainaliB. R.KasemsukpipatW.TairabH.GochooM.JarrahA. (2022). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: Prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919–2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943
6.
BertrandM. G.NamukasaI. K. (2020). STEAM education: Student learning and transferable skills. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-01-2020-0003
7.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Pearson.
8.
BoiceK. L.AlemdarM.JacksonJ. R.KesslerT. C.ChoiJ.GrossmanS.UsselmanM. (2024). Exploring teachers’ understanding and implementation of STEAM: One size does not fit all. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1401191. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1401191
9.
BoiceK. L.JacksonJ. R.AlemdarM.RaoA. E.GrossmanS.UsselmanM. (2021). Supporting teachers on their STEAM journey: A collaborative STEAM teacher training program. Education Sciences, 11(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030105
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
12.
BredaA.GarciaV.SantosN. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions of STEAM education. International Journal of Technology in Education, 6(4), 700–719. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.563
13.
ChangC. Y.DuZ.KuoH. C.ChangC. C. (2023). Investigating the impact of design thinking-based STEAM PBL on students’ creativity and computational thinking. IEEE Transactions on Education, 66(6), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3297221
14.
CondeM. Á.Rodríguez-SedanoF. J.Fernández-LlamasC.GonçalvesJ.LimaJ.García-PeñalvoF. J. (2020). Fostering STEAM through challenge-based learning, robotics, and physical devices: A systematic mapping literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22354
15.
Correia, M., Ribeirinha, T., Beirante, D., Santos, R., Ramos, L., Dias, I. S., Luís, H., Catela, D., Galinha, S., Arrais, A., Portelada, A., Pinto, P., Simões, V., Ferreira, R., Franco, S., Martins, M. C. (2024). Outdoor STEAM education: Opportunities and challenges. Education Sciences, 14(7), 688. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070688
16.
CreswellJ. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education.
17.
DagherZ. R.ErduranS. (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Why does it matter?. Science & Education, 25, 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9800-8
18.
DongY.WangJ.YangY.KurupP. M. (2020). Understanding intrinsic challenges to STEM instructional practices for Chinese teachers based on their beliefs and knowledge base. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00245-0
19.
DubekM.DeLucaC.RickeyN. (2021). Unlocking the potential of STEAM education: How exemplary teachers navigate assessment challenges. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(6), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1990002
20.
ErolA.ErolM.BaşaranM. (2023). The effect of STEAM education with tales on problem solving and creativity skills. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 31(2), 243–258. https://doi.10.1080/1350293X.2022.2081347
21.
FangS. C.FanS. C. (2023). Exploring teachers’ conceptions and implementations of STEM integration at the junior secondary level in Taiwan: An interview study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(7), 2095–2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10335-w
HaesenS.Van de PutE. (2018). STEAM education in Europe: A comparative analysis report. EuroSTEAM.
24.
HatchJ. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press.
25.
HsiaoP.-W.SuC.-H. (2021). A study on the impact of STEAM education for sustainable development courses and its effects on student motivation and learning. Sustainability, 13(7), Article 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073772
JiaY.ZhouB.ZhengX. (2021). A curriculum integrating STEAM and maker education promotes pupils' learning motivation, self-efficacy, and interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 725525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725525
28.
JonesE. A. (2023). A qualitative descriptive study exploring elementary and middle school teachers' perceptions of implementing a STEAM curriculum [Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University].
29.
KesslerT. C.BoiceK. L.KovalJ.JacksonJ. R.ChoiJ.AlemdarM.GrossmanS.SimmonsK.UsselmanM. (2024). Partnerships in STEAM: How collaborating with STEAM experts impacts K-12 teachers’ abilities to implement STEAM lessons in the classroom. Education Sciences, 14(6), 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060666
30.
KüçükH.Perkan ZekiC.İskifoğluG.CanerH. (2023). The impact of a sustainable progressive STEAM program on primary school students’ critical thinking dispositions and mathematics achievements. Sustainability, 15(21), 15356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115356
31.
KwanR.WongB. T. M. (2021). Latest advances in STEAM education research and practice: A review of the literature. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 29(3), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2021.10036022
32.
LiJ.LuoH.ZhaoL.ZhuM.MaL.LiaoX. (2022). Promoting STEAM education in primary school through cooperative teaching: A design-based research study. Sustainability, 14(16), Article 10333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610333
33.
ListonM.MorrinA. M.FurlongT.GriffinL. (2022). Integrating data science and the internet of things into science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics education through the use of new and emerging technologies. Frontiers in Education, 7, 757866. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.757866
34.
MejiasS.ThompsonN.SedasR. M.RosinM.SoepE.PepplerK.RocheJ.WongJ.HurleyM.BellP.BevanB. (2021). The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway. Science Education, 105(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21605
35.
Mitchell, A. L. (2024). An examination of high school teacher experiences with steam curriculum implementation [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University].
36.
Morrin, A. M., & Liston, M. (2020). Engaging children with authentic STEAM learning experiences through design-based approaches. Connected Science Learning, 2(4), 12318723. https://doi.org/10.1080/24758779.2020.12318723
37.
Nurramadhani, A., Kumala, F., & Permana, I. (2021). STEAM-based project learning: The effect to middle school's student's collaboration competences. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2098(1), 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2098/1/012038
Official Website of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (n.d.). State of the nation address of president of the Republic of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev, October 5, 2018. https://www.akorda.kz/en/addresses
PapadopoulouE. A. (2024). Advancements in STEAM education for 21st century learners. International Journal of Education, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.5296/IJE.V16I4.22270
42.
QuigleyC. F.HerroD.KingE.PlankH. (2020). STEAM designed and enacted: Understanding the process of design and implementation of STEAM curriculum in an elementary school. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09832-w
43.
SantosaE. B.DegengI. N. S.SultonKuswandiD. (2020). The effects of mobile computer-supported collaborative learning to improve problem solving and achievements. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 325–342.
44.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.
45.
SunN.SalehS. (2024). The challenges and strategies for promoting equity in STEAM education activities by kindergarten in China. International Journal of Chinese Education, 13(2), 2212585X241273986. https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X241273986
TimotheouS.IoannouA. (2021). Collective creativity in STEAM Making activities. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1873721
48.
Veziroglu-CelikM.OzkayaS.KacarG.SenturkZ. E. (2025). STEAM in early childhood: An analysis towards teachers’ and children’s perspectives. Early Childhood Education Journal, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01897-9
49.
WannapiroonN.PimdeeP. (2022). Thai undergraduate science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) creative thinking and innovation skill development: A conceptual model using a digital virtual classroom learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5689–5716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10849-w
50.
WeiB. (2020). An exploratory study of teacher development in the implementation of integrated science curriculum. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2189–2206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9768-x
51.
YalçınV.ErdenŞ. (2021). The effect of STEM activities prepared according to the design thinking model on preschool children's creativity and problem-solving skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100864
52.
YuliantiE.PhangF. A.HamimiE. H.RahmanN. F. A.SuwonoH. (2024). Exploring science teachers’ perspectives on steam learning. International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education, 34(1), 131–142.
