The successful solving of social problems actualizes the importance of social work in society's sustainable development. Social workers assess people's needs and resources, develop and implement social projects and programs, evaluate the effectiveness of social assistance provided, and search for innovative methods of social support provision. This aspect necessitates the formation of social workers’ readiness to perform research activities. This research aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of implemented learning procedures in mastering the readiness to perform research activities. The article examines the experience of 118 social work bachelors who participated in the learning strategy. Based on the Wilcoxon criterion for dependent samples, we prove that the implemented learning procedure has mastered the readiness to perform research activities. In particular, students encounter less difficulty while planning research, carrying it out, and conducting integrated research analysis.
AditomoA.GoodyearP.BliucA.-M.EllisR. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.616584
2.
ArkhypovaS. (2018). Формування дослідницької компетентності майбутніх магістрів соціальної роботи у процесі професійної підготовки [Formation of research competence of MSW in the process of professional training]. Cherkasy University Bulletin. Series: Pedagogical Sciences, 15, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.31651/2524-2660-2018-15-3-12
3.
ClarkT.HordosyR. (2019). Undergraduate experiences of the research/teaching nexus across the whole student lifecycle. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(3), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1544123
4.
DepanfilisD. (2014). Back to the future: Using social work research to improve social work practice. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/675852
5.
GrantA. M.FranklinJ.LangfordP. (2002). The self-reflection and insight scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(8), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.8.821
6.
GriffithsR. (2004). Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 709–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287212
7.
GrinnellR. M.Jr.UnrauY. (2018). Social work research and evaluation: foundations of evidence-based practice. Oxford University Press.
JenkinsA.HealeyM. (2005). Institutional strategies to link teaching and research. Higher Education Academy.
10.
KapskaA. (2003). Комунікативна професійна компетентність як умова взаємодії соціального працівника з клієнтом [Communicative professional competence as a condition of interaction of a social worker with a client]. DCSSM.
11.
KondratenkoN.KrasnonosovaO.PappV. (2022). Проблеми та перспективи соціально-економічного розвитку регіонів України [the problems and prospects of socioeconomic development of regions of Ukraine]. Business Inform, 1, 198–204. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-1-198-204
12.
KozlyakovskyP. (2004). Загальна психологія [General psychology]. Publishing House of P.Mohyla Mykolaiv State Humanitarian University.
13.
MaschiT.YoudinR. (2011). Social worker as researcher: integrating research with advocacy. Pearson Education.
14.
MorenkoO. (2018). Критерії, показники та рівні готовності майбутніх соціальних працівників до професійного самовдосконалення [criteria, indicators and levels of future social workers’ readiness for professional self-improvement]. Pedagogical Sciences: Theory, History, Innovative Technologies, 10(84), 119–131. URL: https://repository.sspu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/3b63d323-b4d0-4be4-9afb-f52f9ad4a26f/content.
15.
MorgenshternM.FreymondN.HongL.AdamowichT.DuffieM. (2015). Researcher? Social worker? “Let us be both”: Exploring the binaries that condition graduate social work research training. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2002–2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.607
16.
OsisJ. (2016). Evaluation of efficiency in social work practice and supervision: Empirical approach. Proceedings of Latvian Christian Academy, 4, 221–233.
17.
PaulJ.-R.TansyJ. (2020). A phenomenographic study of research informed teaching through the eyes of Masters’ students. Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1554640
18.
PerronB. E.VictorB. G.HiltzB. S.RyanJ. (2020). Teaching note—data science in the MSW curriculum: Innovating training in statistics and research methods. Journal of Social Work Education, 58(1), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2020.1764891
19.
PovidaichykO.PedorenkoV.PopovaA.TurgenievaA.RybinskaY.DemchenkoI. (2021). Research paradigm as a value guideline for professional training of future social workers. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(3), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.3/465
20.
PovidaychykO.PopykM.ReblyanA. (2022). Мотиваційні аспекти науково-дослідницької діяльності студентів закладів вищої освіти [Motivational aspects of scientific research activity of students of higher education institutions]. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: Pedagogy. Social Work, 1(50), 219–222. https://doi.org/10.24144/2524-0609.2022.50.219-222
21.
PrinceM. J.FelderR. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values and value systems. Free Press.
24.
Spronken-SmithR.WalkerR. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research?Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903315502
