Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This mixed-methods study compares how secondary teachers implemented Education Reform in China in 2012 and 2022. The survey asked how often a teaching or evaluation strategy was used. The conclusions indicate that even though teacher-directed lessons (teacher talk, individual work, and questioning) still dominated, subject teachers were using a variety of student-centered learning (SCL) methods (activities and group work) and integration of technology (ICT) in accordance with reform initiatives. Surveys also revealed that classroom management needs decreased as a result of the reforms. The problem lies with the examination system, as there is little room for introducing reform initiatives.

Keywords

education reform international studies student-centered learning integration of technology high-stakes examination

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bremner

(2021). The multiple meanings of ‘student-centred’ or ‘learner-centred’ education, and the case for a more flexible approach to defining it. Comparative Education, 57(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1805863

Chen

(2002). Education reform in China: An interview with Aibe Chen. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 38(2), 93–96. Winter. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2002.10516351

Cheng

K. M.

(2004). Turning the bad master into a good servant. In Bonnet

Canning

Cheng

K. M.

Crooks

T. J.

Crouch

Eyal

Forsberg

Chew

P. G. L.

Ghosh

Gustafsson

Horsky

B. P.

(Eds.), Balancing change a tradition in global education reform (pp. 3–19). Scarecrow Education.

China Education Research Network. (2011). China embarks on basic education reform. Retrieved from https://www.edu.cn/english/education/basicedu/

Clarke

D. M.

(1997). The changing role of the mathematics teacher. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 278–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/749782

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

Gutmann

M. L.

Hanson

W. E.

(2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In Tashakkori

Teddlie

(Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Sage.

Dello-Iacovo

(2009). Curriculum reform and ‘quality education’ in China: An overview. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.02.008

Desimone

L. M.

Smith

T. M.

Frisvold

D. E.

(2010). Survey measures of classroom instruction: Comparing student and teacher reports. Educational Policy, 24(2), 267–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808330173

Earl

Sutherland

(2003). Student engagement in times of turbulent change. McGill Journal of Education, 38(2), 329–343.

10.

Etikan

Musa

S. A.

Alkassim

R. S.

(2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

11.

Fan

Luo

Xie

, et al. (2022). Chinese Students’ access, use and perceptions of ICTs in learning mathematics: Findings from an investigation of Shanghai secondary schools. ZDM Mathematics Education, 54, 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01363-5

12.

Feng

(1999). National college entrance examinations: The dynamics of political centralism in China's elite education. Journal of Education, 181(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205749918100104

13.

Fullan

M. G.

(1996). Turning systemic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(6), 420–423.

14.

Fullan

M. G.

(2000). The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010068703786

15.

Fullan

M. G.

(2001). The new meaning of educational change. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986561

16.

Fullan

M. G.

Stiegelbauer

(1991). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.

17.

Hannum

Cherng

H. Y. S.

(2011). Examinations and educational opportunity in China: Mobility and bottlenecks for the rural poor. Oxford Review of Education, 37(2), 267–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.559387

18.

Helsby

(1999). Changing teachers’ work. Open University Press.

19.

Huang

(Ed.). (2004). Mathematical Experiments: A survey of differences between girls and boys in middle school in China. 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.

20.

Joong

Y. P.

(2012). Perceptions of parents, teachers, and students on secondary education reforms in China. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2012.664481

21.

Joong

Y. P.

(2021). Understanding the ecologies of education reforms: Comparing the perceptions of secondary teachers and students in Mexico. International Journal of Educational Reform, 31(2), 135–167.

22.

Joong

Y. P.

Gibbs

Ramsawak-Jodha

Anderson

Wintz

(2020). Understanding the ecologies of education reforms: Comparing the perceptions of secondary teachers and students in Jamaica, Guyana, and Trinidad and Tobago. Caribbean Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 134–166.

23.

Joong

Y. P.

Mangali

Reganit

A. R.

Swan

(2019). Understanding the ecologies of education reforms: Comparing the perceptions of secondary teachers and students in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Reform, 28(3), 278–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056787919857257

24.

Joong

Noel

(2013). The perceptions of teachers in Sierra Leone's secondary education reform. In R. A. DeVillar, B. Jiang, & J. Cummins (Eds.), Transforming education: Global perspectives, experiences and implications. Peter Lang Publishing.

25.

Joong

Ryan

(2013). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of secondary reform and implementation: A China and Canada comparison. In Y. Hébert & A. A. Abdi (Eds.), Critical perspectives on international education (pp. 263–278). Sense Publishers.

26.

Joong

Ying

Lin

Pan

C. J.

(2006). Voices of students, teachers and parents on the implementation of secondary reforms in China. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 10(26), 1–7.

27.

Joong

Y. P.

Ying

Lin

Pan

C. J.

(2009). Investigation into the perceptions of students, teachers and parents on the implementation of secondary reforms in grades 7 and 8 in China. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(3), 141–154.

28.

Lasky

Sutherland

2000). Policy evaluation: A preliminary analysis of mandated secondary reform from teachers’ perspectives. Annual Edward F. Kelly Evaluation Conference, Albany, NY.

29.

Livingstone

Schweisfurth

Brace

Nash

(2017). Why pedagogy matters: The role of pedagogy in education 2030. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/pedagogy.pdf

30.

Y. P.

Lam

C. C.

Wong

N. Y.

(2006). Chinese Primary school mathematics teachers working in a centralised curriculum system: A case study of two primary schools in north-east China. Compare, 36(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920600741206

31.

Marton

A. M.

(2006). The cultural politics of curricular reform in China: A case study of geographical education in Shanghai. Journal of Contemporary China, 15(47), 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560500534855

32.

Ministry of Education (MOE) of the People’s Republic of China. (2001). Guidelines for the curriculum reform of basic education .

33.

National Association of Secondary School, & Sizer, T. R. (2004). Breaking ranks II: Strategies for leading high school reform. The Education Alliance.

34.

Schweisfurth

(2011). Learner- centered education in developing coutry contexts: From solution to problem? International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.03.005

35.

Song

Y. S.

Zhang

C. H.

(2019). The new round of college entrance examination reform. International Journal of Educational Administration, 11(1), 23–32.

36.

Tao

X. P.

(2003, June 16). Lessons to learn on education reform. China Daily. http://www.china.org.cn/english/culture/67092.htm

37.

Terrell

S. R.

(2012). Mixed-methods research methodologies. Qualitative Report, 17(1), 254–280.

38.

Wang

(2011). The dilemma of time: Student-centered teaching in the rural classroom in China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.012

39.

Whitty

Power

Halpin

(1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state, the market. Australian Council for Educational Research, Open University Press.

40.

Wiggins

McTighe

(2005). Understanding by design (2^nd Ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

41.

Yan

(2015). We can’t change much unless the exams change’: Teachers’ dilemmas in the curriculum reform in China. Improving Schools, 18(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480214553744

42.

You

(2019). The seeming ‘round trip’ of learner-centred education: A ‘best practice’ derived from China’s new curriculum reform? Comparative Education, 55(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2018.1541662

43.

Zeng

(2022). An empirical research on China’s policy for ICT integration in basic education from 1988 to 2021. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 1059–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10079-y

44.

Zhang

(2004). Trend of mathematical education reform in China. In 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.

45.

Zhang

Liu

(2014). A study of secondary school English teachers’ beliefs in the context of curriculum reform in China. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505940

46.

Zhong

(2005). Reconceptualization and curriculum innovation in China. Peking University Education Review, 3(1), 48–57.

47.

Zhou

(2013). Reflections of English teachers: The quality-oriented education reform in China's middle schools. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 8(1), 155–190.

East Meets West: Perceptions of Teachers and Students of Secondary Reform in China in 2012 and 2022

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References