Modernizing Kazakhstan's Higher Education: Challenges of Policy Borrowing and Doctor of Philosophy Graduation Requirements

Abstract

Educational policy borrowing is changing the landscape of Kazakhstan's higher education. Kazakhstan has initiated higher education standards and quality educational services to compete globally to match those in developed countries. The government policy for higher education reform is a measure of convergence: catching up with the advanced knowledge-based economies of Europe and North America and creating a gateway into the European Union and the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. According to the Bologna Process, the government's higher education policy calls for research-based Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degrees. Through this enterprise, the Ministry of Education and Science considers higher education to serve as a beacon light on global competitiveness by mainly introducing the PhD and setting up requirements for graduation commensurate with a research society. This article is a case study investigating the implications of educational policy borrowing and PhD graduation requirements regarding how the students are assimilating and accommodating the requirements. The study explores the implications of how educational policy borrowing impacts PhD graduation requirements and examines the challenges posed by the requirements on PhD students. Our findings indicate that educational borrowing to modernize Kazakhstan focused on developed nations’ social, cultural, and structural characteristics rather than responding positively to changes in Kazakhstan's material and sociocultural environments. We conclude that educational policy borrowing should be selective to integrate national identity procedures by which governments and politicians must reformulate educational borrowing according to atypical nonglobal competitiveness emphasis.

Keywords

global competitiveness higher education Kazakhstan PhD programs Bologna Declaration convergence.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aasen

Proitz

T. S.

Sanberg

. (2014). Knowledge regimes and contradictions in education reform. Education Policy, 28(5), 718–738.

Agbo

S. A.

, et al. (2022). Global competitiveness myths and ideals: English language policy in universities in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Educational Reform, 0(0), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879221137572

Agbo

S. A.

Pak

(2017). Globalization and educational reform in Kazakhstan: English as the language of instruction in graduate programs. International Journal of Educational Reforms, 26(1), 16–45.

Akkary

R. K.

(2014). Facing the challenges of educational reform in the Arab world. Journal of Educational Change, 15, 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-013-9225-6

Baxter

Jack

. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.

Becker

G. S

. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed). The University of Chicago Press.

Beech

(2009). Who is strolling through the global garden? International agencies and educational transfer. In Cowen

Kazamias

A. M.

(Eds.), International handbook of comparative education (pp. 341–358). Springer.

Bhuiyan

S. H.

(2011). Transition towards a knowledge-based society in post-Communist Kazakhstan: Does good governance matter? Journal of Asian and African Studies, 46(4), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909611401565

Butler-Kisber

(2018). Qualitative inquiry: Thematic, narrative and art-based perspectives (2nd ed.). Sage.

10.

Carney

Rappleye

Silova

(2012). Between faith and science: World culture theory and comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 56(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1086/665708

11.

Clayton

(2004). Competing conceptions of globalization” revisited: Relocating the tension between world-systems analysis and globalization analysis. Comparative Education Review, 48(3), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1086/421180

12.

Creswell

(2012). Educational research. Pearson Education, Inc.

13.

Creswell

J. W.

(2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

14.

Dale

Robertson

S. L.

(2002). The varying effects of regional organizations as subjects of globalization of education. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 10–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/324052

15.

Frank

A. G

. (1972). Lumpenbourgeoisie: Lumpendevelopment – Dependence, class, and politics in Latin America. Monthly Review Press.

16.

Furlong

(2013). Globalisation, neoliberalism, and the reform of teacher education in England. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2013.739017

17.

Harrison

(1988). The sociology of modernization and development. Unwin Hyman.

18.

Hartley

, et al. (2016). Learning autonomy: Higher education reform in Kazakhstan. Higher Education, 72, 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9953-z

19.

Head

I. L.

(1991). On a hinge of history: The mutual vulnerability of South and North. University of Toronto Press.

20.

Hettne

(1990). Development theory and three worlds. John Wiley & Sons.

21.

Ibraev

A. Z.

, et al. (2015). Reforming the system of research staff training: Doctoral (Ph.D.) education in Kazakhstan. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 42(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688215020082

22.

Inkeles

Smith

D. H.

(1974). Becoming modern: Individual change in six developing countries. Harvard University Press.

23.

Jarvis

(2009). Lifelong learning and globalization: Towards a structural comparative model. In Cowen

Kazamias

A. M.

(Eds.), International handbook of comparative education (pp. 601–617). Springer.

24.

Kamens

D. H.

McNeely

C. L.

(2010). Globalization and the growth of international testing and national assessment. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/648471

25.

Kazakhstan 2030: Prosperity, Security and Ever-Growing Welfare for all Kazakhstanis. (1997). Retrieved June 5, 2020 from https://www.akorda.kz/en/official_documents/strategies_and_programs.

26.

Klerides

(2009). National cultural identities, discourse analysis and comparative Education. In Cowen

Kazamias

A. M.

(Eds.), International handbook of comparative education (pp. 1225–1248). Springer.

27.

Kohl

. (1994). I won’t learn from you: And other thoughts on creative maladjustment. The New Press.

28.

Lather

(1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807017

29.

McClelland

D. C

. (1961). The achieving society. van Nostrand.

30.

McLaren

(2007). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of Education (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

31.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th edition). Jossey Bass.

32.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd edition). Sage Publications Inc.

33.

One Hundred Steps in Implementing Five Institutional Reforms. (2015). Retrieved on April 2022 from http://www.astanatimes.com/2015/05/kazakhstan-unveils-100-concrete-steps-to-implement-institutional-reforms/.

34.

Patton

M. Q.

(2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th edition). Sage Publications Inc.

35.

Phillips

Ochs

(2004). Researching policy borrowing, some methodological challenges in comparative education. British Education Research Journal, 30(6), 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000279495

36.

Pickel

(2013). Nations, national cultures, and natural languages: A contribution to the sociology of nations. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 43(4), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12018

37.

Robertson

S. L.

Dale

(2015). Towards a ‘critical cultural political economy’ account of the globalising of education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 13(1), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.967502

38.

Rostow

W. W.

(1990). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

39.

Saha

L. J.

(1991). Universities and national development: Issues and problems in developing countries. Prospects, 21(2), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336065

40.

Santos

(1973). The crisis of development theory and the problem of development in Latin America. In Bernstein

(Ed.), Underdevelopment and development (pp. 57–80). Richard Clay (The Chaucer Press) Ltd.

41.

Savin-Baden

Major

C. W.

(2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge.

42.

Stake

R. E

. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

43.

The Address of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan N. Nazarbayev to the People of Kazakhstan, February 28, 2007. Retrieved on July 18, 2015 from www.edu.gov.kz/en/node/5475

44.

The State Program on Education Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2011-2020. Retrieved on July 18, 2019 from http://www.akorda.kz/en/category/gos_programmi_razvitiya

45.

Trihn

A. N.

(2018). Local insights from the Vietnamese education system: The impacts of imperialism, colonialism, and neoliberalism of globalization. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 17(3), 67–79.

46.

Veniziani

Yoshihara

(2017). Globalization and inequality in a dynamic economy: An axiomatic analysis of an equal change. Social Choice & Welfare, 49, 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1062-8

47.

Wang

D. T.

(2018). Trend of community of shared future for mankind in the perspective of Marx’s thoughts of globalization. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 18(6), 3753–3760.

48.

Yin

R. K

. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage.