Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper examines the issue of student choice across subject streams in recent government reforms to China’s National College Entrance Exam (NCEE). Utilizing data from a case study of an urban high school in Beijing, it argues that student choice of subjects across previous streams of science or fine arts runs counter to existing institutional structures at the secondary and higher education level, consideration of pedagogical techniques that differ by streams, and a “bias” for science grounded in sociohistorical concerns of national development.

Keywords

chinese education National College Entrance Exam reforms science education secondary education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Central Committee of the CCP (2013). Decision of the CCCPC on some major issues concerning comprehensively deepening the reform and comprehensively promoting quality education (中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定). Retrieved from http://www.china.org.cn/chinese/2014-01/17/content_31226494.htm.

Chan

Ngok

(2011). Accumulating human capital while increasing educational inequality: A study on higher education policy in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2011.594420

Cheng

White

(2009). Elite transformation and modern change in mainland China and Taiwan: Empirical data and the theory of technocracy. The China Quarterly, 121, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000013497

Eisenhardt

K. M.

(1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

Elman

B. A.

(2000). A cultural history of civil examinations in late imperial China. University of California Press.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (first edition). Routledge.

Haedicke

M. A.

Hallett

(2016). How to look two ways at once: Research strategies for an inhabited institutionalism. In Elsbach

K. D.

Kramer

R. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative organizational research: Innovative pathways and methods (pp. 99–111). Routledge.

Han

Appelbaum

R. P.

(2018). China's science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research environment: A snapshot. PLoS ONE, 13(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195347

Hartley

(2004). Case study research. In Cassell

Symon

(Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 323–333). Sage Publications.

10.

(2017). The third plenary session of the eighteenth central committee of the C.P.C.A New milestone in China's Reform. In Hu

(Ed.), The modernization of China's State governance (pp. 39–68). Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-3370-4_2.

11.

(2019). Science or liberal arts? Cultural capital and college major choice in China. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(1), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12342

12.

(2014). The reform of the “double track system’’ in the college entrance examination is obvious, Guangming Daily, March 27th, http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2014/0327/c40531-24749269.html.

13.

Jia

Ericson

D. P.

(2017). Equity and access to higher education in China: Lessons from hunan province for university admissions policy. International Journal of Educational Development, 52, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.10.011

14.

Kwong

J. C.

(1979). Chinese Education in transition: Prelude to the cultural revolution. McGill-Queen's University Press.

15.

Lam

(2011). A passion for facts: Social surveys and the construction of the Chinese nation-state, 1900–1949. University of California Press.

16.

Piachaud

(2004). Poverty and inequality and social policy in China: CASE paper 87, Centre for analysis of social exclusion, November, 1–49.

17.

(2017). Educational policy development in China for the 21st century: Rationality and challenges in a globalizing Age. Chinese Education & Society, 50(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2017.1330992

18.

(2017). 浙江省新高考科目改革的影响及其因应, The impact of the reform of the new college entrance examination in Zhejiang province and its response. Education and Examination, 2, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.16391/j.cnki.jyks.2017.02.004

19.

Ling

(2015). “Bad students go to vocational schools!”: Education, social reproduction and migrant youth in urban China. China Journal, 73, 108–131. https://doi.org/10.1086/679271

20.

Liu

(2012). An overview of development of higher education access in China. Higher Education Studies, 2(2), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n2p107

21.

Liu

(2014). Independent freshman admission and educational inequality in the access to elite higher education: Evidence from Peking University. Chinese Sociological Review, 46(4), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA2162-0555460403

22.

Liu

Wang

Yang

(2012). Selecting the elite: Status, geography and capital - admission of rural students into peking university. International Journal of Chinese Education, 1 (1), 19–53. https://doi.org/10.1163/221258612X644548

23.

Merriam

S. B.

(1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education, 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

24.

Mertens

(2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

25.

Ministry of Education (2014). Opinions on the High School Academic Proficiency Test. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3732/201808/t20180807_344610.html.

26.

Mok

(2012). Bringing the state back in: Restoring the role of the state in Chinese higher education. European Journal of Education, 47(2), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2012.01520.x

27.

Mok

Jiang

(2017). Massification of higher education and challenges for graduate employment and social mobility: East Asian experiences and sociological reflections. International Journal of Educational Development, 63, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.02.003

28.

OECD (2016). Education in China: A snapshot. https://www.oecd.org/education/Education-in-China-a-snapshot.pdf.

29.

Pepper

(2000). Radicalism and education reform in twentieth-century China: The search for an ideal development model. Cambridge University Press.

30.

Rossman

G. B.

Rallis

S. F.

(2017). An introduction to qualitative research: Learning in the field, 4th edition. Sage publications.

31.

Schmalzer

(2008). The people's Peking Man: Popular science and human identity in twentieth-century China. University of Chicago Press.

32.

Schulte

(2019). Innovation and control: Universities, the knowledge economy and the authoritarian state in China. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 5(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2018.1535732

33.

State Council (2010). Outline of China's national plan for medium and long-term education reform and development, 2010–2020 (国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要), 17th National People's Congress. Retrieved from http://ncee.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Sha-non-AV-5-China-Education-Plan-2010-2020.pdf.

34.

State Council (2014). Directive on deepening the implementation of the reform of the examination enrollment system (国务院关于深化考试招生制度改革的实施意见). Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-09/04/content_9065.htm.

35.

Tan

(2018). Assessment reform in Shanghai: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Educational Reform, 27(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791802700304

36.

Teddie

Tashakkori

(2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative ad qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage Publications.

37.

Thøgersen

(2001). State and society in Chinese education. In Peterson

Hayhoe

(Eds.), Education, culture, and identity in twentieth-century China (pp. 187–192). University of Michigan Press.

38.

Unger

(1982). Education under Mao: Class and competition in canton schools, 1960–1980. Columbia University Press.

39.

Vickers

Xiaodong

(2017). Education and society in post-Mao China. Routledge.

40.

Wan

(2018). College entrance examination reform fairness and scientific selection - A Review of the Enrollment Reform of the New College Entrance Examination (高考改革公平科学选才- 新高考招生录取改革述评) China Education News Network - China Education Daily (中国教育新闻网-中国教育报), August 3.

41.

Wang

(2016). Double-layered and hidden worries in the reform of the college entrance examination's dual-track system (高考双轨制改革的双层隐忧). Science and Technology Journal, March, 14(1), 5–8. Article ID number: 2095-364X（2015）01-0007-05.

42.

Ping

(2016). Gaokao in China: A reform conundrum, EAI background brief, No. 1146. National University of Singapore.

43.

Yang

(2011). Postcoloniality and religiosity in modern China: The disenchantments of sovereignty. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(2), 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276410396915

44.

Yang

(2000). Tensions between the global and the local: A comparative illustration of the reorganization of China's Higher education in the 1950s and 1990s. Higher Education, 39(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003905902434

45.

Yuan

(2001). “The status of confucianism in modern Chinese education, 1901–49: A curricular study”, 193–215. In Peterson

Hayhoe

(Eds.), Education, culture, and identity in twentieth-century China (pp. 193–213). University of Michigan Press.

46.

Zhang

Zhao

Lei

(2012). Between a rock and a hard place: Higher education reform and innovation in China. On the Horizon, 20(4), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121211272489

47.

Zhen

(2017). Strive to build a modern examination enrollment system with Chinese characteristics (努力建设中国特色现代考试招生制度). China Examinations, 5(301), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.19360/j.cnki.11-3303/g4.2018.06.001

48.

Zhu

(2014). Works by Zhu yongxin on education: My vision on education. McGraw-Hill Education.

A Bias for Science: Institutions,Pedagogy,and the Reality of Student Choice Across Subjects in China's NCEE Reforms

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References