Utilizing a conceptual approach, this study explores several political factors that coalesced to paralyze secondary education reform initiatives in Trinidad and Tobago. It discusses how changes in government impact reform priorities, and examines key strategies for overcoming political obstacles. One such strategy is the application of incremental rather than synoptic approaches to education reform. While most education reforms occur as a result of political action, the paper concludes that politicians are the ones largely responsible for presenting political challenges that often result in aborted reform policies, which negatively impact the general quality of education in a developing country.
AndersonG. L. (1999). The politics of participatory reforms in education. Theory Into Practice, 38(4), 191–195.doi:10.1080/00405849909543853
2.
BowenG. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027
3.
ConnellyM.Fang HeM.PhillionJ.. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction. SAGE Publications, Inc.
4.
CorralesJ. (1999). The politics of education reform: Bolstering the supply and demand; overcoming institutional blocks. The Education Reform and Management Series, II(1), 1–52.
5.
ElmoreR. (1997). The politics of education reform. Issues in Science and Technology, 14(1), 41–49.
6.
FuhrmanS. (1994). Politics and systemic education reform. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
7.
GardaR. (2011). The politics of education reform: Lessons from new Orleans. Journal of Law & Education, 40(1), 57–103.
8.
GeddesB. (1994). Politician’s dilemma. Building state capacity in Latin America. University of California Press.
9.
GordonL. (1992). The New Zealand state and education reforms: Competing interests. U.S. Department of Education.
10.
HaddadW.DemskyT. (1994). The dynamics of education policymaking: Case studies of Burkina Faso, Jordan, Peru and Thailand. IBRD/World Bank.
11.
HuA.VerdugoR. R. (2015). An analysis of teacher education policies in China. International Journal of Educational Reform, 24(1), 37–54.doi:10.1177/105678791502400104
12.
JosephS. (2010). Lessons learnt from six years of education reform. Caribbean Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 19–36.
13.
KempS. (2004). Project management demystified. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
14.
KhanA.MirzaM. (2011). Implementation of decentralization in education in Pakistan: Framework, status and the way forward. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 5(2), 146–169.
15.
LasswellH. (1958). Politics: Who gets what, when, how. World Publishing Co.
16.
Secondary Education Modernization Programme Implementation Manual. (1999). A Project of the Inter-American Development Bank and Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago.
17.
Trinidad and Tobago Education Act. (1966). Trinidad and Tobago: Government Printery.
18.
WeilerH. N. (1990). Comparative perspectives on educational decentralization: An exercise in contradiction?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(4), 433–448.doi:10.3102/01623737012004433
19.
WilsonJ. (1973). Political organizations. Basic Books.
20.
World Bank. (1995). Priorities and strategies for education. A world bank review. The World Bank Group.
