This article utilizes social movement theory to analyze policy change created by site-based educators. The author uses a qualitative case study to examine how an organization comprised of teachers and administrators in New York State used protest to protect a waiver, which exempted students in their schools from having to pass statewide graduation exams. The author finds that the educators’ ability to mobilize resources and to strategically frame their struggle in a manner that resonated with policymakers allowed the educator activists to capitalize on emerging controversies surrounding the state’s assessment system and create policy change. This article provides a framework to understand how marginalized actors within systems of schooling organize to create change. Such a framework is becoming increasingly relevant as educators attempt to create space for local practice in the current top-down policy environment.
An act to amend the education law, in relation to directing the commissioner of education to develop alternative assessments for Regents exams, New York State Assembly (2004a). .
2.
An act to amend the education law, in relation to directing the commissioner of education to develop alternative assessments for Regents exams, New York State Senate (2004b). .
3.
Amenta, E., & Caren, N. ( 2004). The legislative, organizational, and beneficiary consequences of state-oriented challengers. In D. A. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 461-488). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
4.
Arenson, K.W. ( 2003, October 8). State lowering bar on Regents exams needed to graduate. New York Times, p. 1.
5.
Armstrong, E.A., & Bernstein, M. ( 2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory , 26(1), 74-99.
6.
Benford, R.D., & Snow, D. ( 2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
7.
Binder, A.J. ( 2002). Contentious curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
8.
Burstein, P., Einwohner, R.L., & Hollander, J.A. (1995). The success of political movements: A bargaining perspective. In J. C. Jenkins & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The politics of social movements (pp. 275-295). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
9.
Carnoy, M., & Levin, H.M. ( 1985). Schooling and work in the democratic state. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Coburn, C.E., Bae, S., & Turner, E.O. ( 2008). Authority, status, and the dynamics of insider-outsider partnership at the district level. Peabody Journal of Education , 83(3), 364-399.
11.
Cohen, D.K., & Spillane, J.P. (1992). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. Review of Research in Education, 18(1), 3-49.
12.
Cress, D.M., & Snow, D.A. ( 2000). The outcomes of homeless mobilization: The influence of organization, disruption, political mediation and framing. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 1063-1104.
13.
Datnow, A. ( 1998). The gender politics of educational change. London: Falmer.
14.
Davies, S. ( 1999). From moral duty to cultural rights: A case study of political framing in education. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 1-21.
15.
Dillon, S. ( 2003, June 24). Regents says board favors setting aside math score. New York Times, p.5.
16.
Dorgan, K. ( 2004). A year in the life of an elementary school: One school’s experiences in meeting new mathematics standards. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1209-1228.
17.
Edwards, B., & McCarthy, J.D. (2004). Resources and social movement organizations. In D. A. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 116-152). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18.
Eisenstein, H. ( 1996). Inside agitators: Australian Femocrats and the state . Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
19.
Eisinger, P. ( 1973). The conditions of protest behavior inAmerican cities. American Political Science Review, 67(1), 11-28.
20.
Epstein, S. ( 1996). Impure science: Aids, activism, and the politics of knowledge . Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Finkelstein, B., Malen, B., Muncey, D.E., Rice, J.K., Croninger, R.G., Briggs, L., et al. (2000). Caught in contradictions: The first two years of school reconstitution initiative. College Park : Department of Policy and Leadership, University of Maryland.
22.
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. London: Falmer.
23.
Gilkes, C.T. ( 1988). Building in many places: Multiple commitments and ideologies in black women’s community work. In A. Bookman & S. Morgen (Eds.), Women and the politics of empowerment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
24.
Giugni, M.G. ( 1998). Social movements and change. In M. G. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), From contention to democracy (pp. xi-xxvi). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
Goffman, E. ( 1974). Frame analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
26.
Gormley, M. ( 2003a, October 14). Anti-testing group says exams hurting minorities. TheAssociated Press State & Local Wire.
27.
Gormley, M. ( 2003b, July 11). State: Physics Regents exam was hard, but fair. TheAssociated Press State and Local Wire.
28.
Greene, J.P., & Winters, M.A. ( 2005). Public high school graduation and college-readiness rates: 1991-2002. Retrieved June 13, 2005, from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp_08.htm
29.
Grossman, F.D. ( 2005). Dissent from within: How educational insiders use protest to reshape their institution. Unpublished dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
30.
Hill, H.C. ( 2001). Policy is not enough: Language and the interpretation of state standards. American Educational Research Journal , 38(2), 289-320.
31.
Hirschman, A.O. ( 1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Honig, M.I. ( 2006). Complexity and policy implementation: Challenges and opportunities for the field. In M. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 1-24). Albany: State University of New York Press.
33.
Hubbard, L., Mehan, H., & Stein, M.K. ( 2006). Reforming as learning: School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. New York : Routledge.
34.
Hursh, D. ( 2003). Discourse, power and resistance: The rise of testing and accountability and the decline of teacher professionalism and local control . In J. Satterthwaite, A. Elizabeth, & K. Gale (Eds.), Discourse, power and resistance: Challenging the rhetoric of contemporary education. Stoke on Trent , UK: Trentham Books.
35.
Jenkins, J.C., & Perrow, C. ( 1977). Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movement (1946-1972) . American Sociological Review, 42(2), 249-268.
36.
Katzenstein, M.F. ( 1999). Faithful and fearless: Moving feminist protest inside the church and military. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Kerchner, C.T., Koppich, J.E., & Weeres, J.G. ( 1997). United mind workers: Unions and teaching in the knowledge society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
38.
Kirp, D.L., & Driver, D.L. ( 1995). The aspirations of systemic reform meet the realities of localism. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 589-612.
39.
Lieberman, M. ( 1997). The teachers unions: How the NEA and the AFT sabotage reform and hold students, parents, teachers, and taxpayers hostage to bureaucracy . New York: Free Press.
40.
Lindsay, D. ( 2000). Con-test. Education Week, 19(30), 30-37.
41.
Lugg, C.A. ( 2001). The Christian right: A cultivated collection of interest groups. Educational Policy, 15(41), 41-57.
42.
Malen, B. ( 2006). Revisiting policy implementation as a political phenomenon: The case of reconstitution policies. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 83-104). Albany: State University of New York Press.
43.
Malen, B., & Cochran, M.V. ( 2008). Beyond pluralistic patterns of power: Research on the micropolitics of schools. In B. S. Cooper , J. G. Cibulka, & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 148-178). New York: Routledge.
44.
McAdam, D. ( 1999). Political process and the development of Black insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. ( 2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
46.
McCarthy, J.D., & Wolfson, M. ( 1996). Resource mobilization by local social movement organizations: Agency, strategy, and organization in the movement against drinking and driving . American Sociological Review, 61, 1070-1088.
47.
McCarthy, J.D., & Zald, M.N. ( 1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212-1241.
48.
McDaniel, J.E., & Miskel, C.G. ( 2002). Stakeholder salience: Business and educational policy . Teachers College Record, 104(2), 325-356.
49.
McLaughlin, M. ( 1987). Learning from experiences: Lessons from policy implementation . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171-178.
50.
Medina, J. ( 2002, June 25). More failing physics exam, and Albany is investigating . New York Times, p. 5.
51.
Merriam, S.B. ( 1988). Case study in education. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
52.
Meyer, D.S. ( 2005). Introduction: Social movements and public policy. In D. S. Meyer (Ed.), Routing the opposition (pp. 1-26). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
53.
Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, B. ( 2006). Institutional analysis and the study of education. In H.-D. Meyer (Ed.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 1-13). Albany: State University of New York Press.
54.
Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. ( 1978). The structure of educational organizations. In M. Meyer and Associates (Eds.), Environments and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55.
Miao, J., & Haney, W. ( 2004). High school graduation rates: Alternative methods and implications. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(55). Retrieved June 3, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n55/
56.
Mickelson, R.A. ( 1999). International business machinations: A case study of corporate involvement in local educational reform. Teachers College Record, 100(3), 476-512.
57.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Mills, R. ( 2005). Commissioner’s report to the state board of regents . Retrieved March 7, 2005, from http://www.oms.nysed.gov/comm/2005/0205Commrep.htm
59.
Moore, K. ( 1999). Political protest and institutional change: The anti-Vietnam war movement and American science. In M. Giugni , D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
60.
Murphy, M. ( 1990). Blackboard unions: The AFT & the NEA 1900-1980. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
61.
Oberschall, A. ( 1973). Social conflict and social movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
62.
Pedulla, J.T., Abrams, L.M., Madaus, G.F., Russell, M.K., Ramos, M.A., & Mio, J. ( 2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Boston: LynchSchool of Education, BostonCollege.
63.
Piven, F.F., & Cloward, R.A. ( 1979). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Vintage.
64.
Reinelt, C. ( 1995). Moving onto the terrain of the state: The battered women’s movement and the politics of engagement. In M. M. Ferree & P. Y. Martin (Eds.), Feminist organizations (pp. 81-104). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
65.
Riede, P. ( 2001). Testing dissidents. The School Administrator , 58(11), 6-11.
66.
Scott, R.W. ( 2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
67.
Shipps, D. ( 1997). The invisible hand: Big business and Chicago school. Teachers College Record, 99(1), 73-116.
68.
Sleeter, C.E. ( 1996). Multicultural education as a social movement. Theory Into Practice, 35(4), 239-247.
69.
Snow, D.A., & Benford, R.D. ( 1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization . In B. Klandermans, H. Kruesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), International social movement research (Vol. 1, pp. 197-218). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
70.
Snow, D.A., Rochford, E.B., Jr. , Worden, S.K., & Benford , R.D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464-481.
71.
Spalter-Roth, R., & Schreiber, R. ( 1995). Outsider issues and insider tactics: Strategic tensions in the women’s policy network during the 1980s. In M. M. Ferree & P. Y. Martin (Eds.), Feminist organizations (pp. 105-127). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
72.
Spillane, J., & Burch, P. ( 2006). The institutional environment and instructional practice: Changing patterns of guidance and control in public education. In H.-D. Meyer (Ed.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 87-102). Albany: State University of New York Press.
73.
Strang, D., & Jung, D.-I. ( 2005). Organizational change as an orchestrated social movement . In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organizational theory (pp. 280-309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
Tarrow, S. ( 1998). Social protest and policy reform: May 1968 and the loi d’ orientation in France. In M. G. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), From contention to democracy (pp. 31-56). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
75.
The National Commission on Excellence in Education. ( 1983). A nation at risk. Washington D.C. : United States Department of Education. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html
76.
Tilly, C. ( 1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
77.
Tyack, D. ( 1974). The one best system. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
78.
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. ( 1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79.
Weick, K.E. ( 1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems . Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1-19.
80.
Wildavsky, A. ( 1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
81.
Yin, R.K. ( 2003). Application of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
