Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-1
Participation in Decision Making and Affective Trust Among the Teaching Staff: A 2-Year Cross-Lagged Structural Equation Modeling During Implementation Reform
The research investigated whether teachers’ participation in decision-making (PDM) contributes to the development of affective trust during school reform over time, or vice versa. A model including principals’ interpersonal skills was tested during implementation of the organizational reform. Teachers (n = 1,482) from 113 Israeli elementary schools participated in the first measurement, and 1,390 teachers from 106 of these schools participated in the second measurement. A cross-lagged design for 2 years showed that PDM leads to affective trust over time. Furthermore, PDM mediated the relationship between principals’ interpersonal skills and affective trust over time.
AgoteL.AramburuN.LinesR. (2016). Authentic leadership perception, trust in the leader, and followers’ emotions in organizational change processes. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52(1), 35–63.doi:10.1177/0021886315617531
2.
AkaikeH. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332.doi:10.1007/BF02294359
3.
ArarK. (2018). Arab principals’ and teachers’ perceptions of trust and regulation and their contribution to school processes. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(4), 1–16.doi:10.1080/15700763.2018.1475576
4.
ArarK.Masry-HarzallahA. (2018). Trust among teachers and educational counsellors in the Arab education system. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–13.
AugustssonH.RichterA.HassonH.von Thiele SchwarzU. (2017). The need for dual openness to change: A longitudinal study evaluating the impact of employees’ openness to organizational change content and process on intervention outcomes. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53(3), 349–368.doi:10.1177/0021886317691930
7.
BaronR. A.MarkmanG. D. (2000). Beyond social capital: How social skills can enhance entrepreneurs’ success. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 106–116.doi:10.5465/ame.2000.2909843
8.
BattilanaJ.GilmartinM.SengulM.PacheA. -C.AlexanderJ. A. (2010). Leadership competencies for implementing planned organizational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 422–438.doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.007
9.
BersonY.Da’asR.WaldmanD. A. (2015). How do leaders and their teams bring about organizational learning and outcomes?Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 79–108.
10.
BlaseJ.BlaseJ. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of educational administration, 38(2), 130–141.
11.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. InKleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W.J.. (Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp.349–381). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
12.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. InK. ABollen.J. SLong. (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (chapter 6). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
ByrneB. M. (2006). Structural Equation Modeling with Eqs: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
CampionM. A.MedskerG. J.HiggsA. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823–847.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
15.
ChenX. P.EberlyM. B.ChiangT. J.FarhJ. L.ChengB. S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 796–819.
16.
ChoY. J.PoisterT. H. (2014). Managerial practices, trust in leadership, and performance: Case of the Georgia department of transportation. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 179–196.
17.
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577.doi:10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558
18.
CorriganM. W.ChapmanP. E. (2008). Trust in teachers: A motivating element to learning. Radical Pedagogy, 9(2), 3.
19.
CottonJ. L.VollrathD. A.FroggattK. L.Lengnick-HallM. L.JenningsK. R. (1988). Employee participation: Diverse forms and different outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 8–22.doi:10.5465/amr.1988.4306768
20.
Da’asR. (2014). The impact of school principals’ leadership skills on organizational processes and outcomes in the context of educational reform. Haifa, Israel: University of Haifa. (in Hebrew).
21.
Da’asR. (2017). School principals’ leadership skills: measurement equivalence across cultures. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(2), 207–222.
Da’asR. (2019). Teachers’ skill flexibility: Examining the impact of principals’ skills and teachers’ participation in decision making during educational reform. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(2), 287–299.
24.
ErdemF.OzenJ. (2003). Cognitive and affective dimensions of trust in developing team performance. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 9(5/6), 131–135.doi:10.1108/13527590310493846
25.
FarndaleE.Van RuitenJ.KelliherC.Hope‐HaileyV. (2011). The influence of perceived employee voice on organizational commitment: An exchange perspective. Human Resource Management, 50(1), 113–129.doi:10.1002/hrm.20404
26.
FisherR.DavisW. H. (1999). Six basic interpersonal skills for a negotiator’s Repertoire. InLewickiR. J.SaundersD. M.MintonJ. W. (Eds.), Negotiation, Readings, Exercises, and Cases (Third edition, pp.354). Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill Companies.
27.
Ganon-ShilonS.SchechterC. (2018). School principals’ sense-making of their leadership role during reform implementation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–22.
28.
Gao-UrhahnX.BiemannT.JarosS. J. (2016). How affective commitment to the organization changes over time: A longitudinal analysis of the reciprocal relationships between affective organizational commitment and income. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 515–536.doi:10.1002/job.2088
29.
GhamrawiN. (2011). Trust me: Your school can be better—a message from teachers to principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(3), 333–348.doi:10.1177/1741143210393997
30.
GillenD. J.CarrollS. J. (1985). Relationship of managerial ability to unit effectiveness in more organic versus more mechanistic departments. Journal of Management Studies, 22(6), 668–676.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1985.tb00017.x
HakanenJ. J.SchaufeliW. B.AholaK. (2008). The job demands-resources model: A three-year cross-lagged study of burnout, depression, commitment, and work engagement. Work & Stress, 22(3), 224–241.doi:10.1080/02678370802379432
33.
HallingerP.BryantD. A. (2013). Synthesis of findings from 15 years of educational reform in Thailand: lessons on leading educational change in East Asia. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(4), 399–418.doi:10.1080/13603124.2013.770076
34.
HambrickD. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.
35.
HarrisS.CombsJ.EdmonsonS. (2013). Examining what we do to improve our schools: Eight steps from analysis to action: Routledge.
36.
HattieJ. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. London: Routledge.
37.
HellerF.PusićE.StraussG.WilpertB. (1998). Organizational Participation: Myth and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
HillN. S.SeoM. -G.KangJ. H.TaylorM. S. (2012). Building employee commitment to change across organizational levels: The influence of hierarchical distance and direct managers’ transformational leadership. Organization Science, 23(3), 758–777.doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0662
39.
HoyleR. H. (1995). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Israeli Ministry of Education. (2012). Evaluation of the New Horizon Reform in Elementary and Junior High Education at the End of Three Years of Implementation: Summary of Findings. In . Jerusalem: Ministry of Education.
41.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
42.
JongeJ.DormannC.JanssenP. P. M.DollardM. F.LandeweerdJ. A.NijhuisF. J. N. (2001). Testing reciprocal relationships between job characteristics and psychological well-being: A cross-lagged structural equation model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(1), 29–46.doi:10.1348/096317901167217
43.
KivimäkiM.FeldtT.VahteraJ.NurmiJ. -E. (2000). Sense of coherence and health: Evidence from two cross-lagged longitudinal samples. Social Science & Medicine, 50(4), 583–597.doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00326-3
44.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163.doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
45.
KumarS. P.SahaS. (2017). Influence of trust and participation in decision making on employee attitudes in Indian public sector undertakings. SAGE Open, 7(3), 1–13.doi:10.1177/2158244017733030
46.
KutsyurubaB.WalkerK. (2015). The lifecycle of trust in educational leadership: An ecological perspective. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(1), 106–121.doi:10.1080/13603124.2014.915061
47.
LangtonN.RobbinsS. (2007). Fundamentals of Organizational Behaviour. Toronto,ON: Pearson Education Canada.
48.
LiL.HallingerP.WalkerA. (2016). Exploring the mediating effects of trust on principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 20–42.doi:10.1177/1741143214558577
49.
LinesR. (2004). Influence of participation in strategic change: Resistance, organizational commitment and change goal achievement. Journal of Change Management, 4(3), 193–215.doi:10.1080/1469701042000221696
50.
LouisK. S. (2007). Changing the culture of schools: Professional community, organizational learning, and trust. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 477–487.doi:10.1177/105268460601600502
51.
LuX. (2014). Ethical leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 42(3), 379–389.doi:10.2224/sbp.2014.42.3.379
52.
MaxwellS. E.ColeD. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23–44.doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23
53.
McAllisterD. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. The academy of management journal,, 38, 24–59.
54.
MichaelisB.StegmaierR.SonntagK. (2009). Affective commitment to change and innovation implementation behavior: The role of charismatic leadership and employees’ trust in top management. Journal of Change Management, 9(4), 399–417.doi:10.1080/14697010903360608
55.
MorinA. J. S.MeyerJ. P.BélangerÉ.BoudriasJ. -S.GagnéM.ParkerP. D. (2016). Longitudinal associations between employees’ beliefs about the quality of the change management process, affective commitment to change and psychological empowerment. Human Relations, 69(3), 839–867.doi:10.1177/0018726715602046
56.
MoyeM. J.HenkinA. B.EgleyR. J. (2005). Teacher-principal relationships: Exploring linkages between empowerment and interpersonal trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(3), 260–277.
57.
MumfordM. D.MarksM. A.ConnellyM. S.ZaccaroS. J.Reiter-PalmonR. (2000). Development of leadership skills: Experience, timing, and growth. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 87–114.
58.
MumfordT.CampionM. A.MorgesonF. P. (2007). The leadership skills strataplex: Leadership skill requirements across organizational levels. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2), 154–166.doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.01.005
59.
MuthenL. K.MuthenB. O. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed). Los Angeles: Muthen and Muthen.
60.
NewcombeG.McCormickJ. (2001). Trust and teacher participation in school-based financial decision making. Educational Management & Administration, 29(2), 181–195.doi:10.1177/0263211X010292004
61.
OregS. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73–101.doi:10.1080/13594320500451247
62.
PaulsenN.CallanV. J.GriceT. A.RooneyD.GalloisC.JonesE.BordiaP. . .. (2005). Job uncertainty and personal control during downsizing: A comparison of survivors and victims. Human Relations, 58(4), 463–496.doi:10.1177/0018726705055033
63.
PloyhartR. E.VandenbergR. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36(1), 94–120.doi:10.1177/0149206309352110
64.
PopperK. R. (1968). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New-York and Evanston: Harper and Row publishers.
65.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.doi:10.1080/00273170701341316
66.
SchaubroeckJ.LamS. S. K.PengA. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 863–871.doi:10.1037/a0022625
67.
SentočnikS.SalesG. C.RichardsonJ. W. (2016). Educational reform in Georgia: recommendations for building leadership capacity as a critical success factor for instructional change. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(423), 1–18.doi:10.1080/13603124.2016.1224931
68.
SeoM. G. U.TaylorM. S.HillN. S.ZhangX.TeslukP. E.LorinkovaN. M. (2012). The role of affect and leadership during organizational change. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 121–165.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01240.x
69.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and non- experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445.doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
70.
SomechA. (2010). Participative decision making in schools: A mediating-moderating analytical framework for understanding school and teacher outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(2), 174–209.doi:10.1177/1094670510361745
71.
SwiftP. E.HwangA. (2013). The impact of affective and cognitive trust on knowledge sharing and organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 20(1), 20–37.doi:10.1108/09696471311288500
72.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyW. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.doi:10.3102/00346543070004547
73.
Tschannen‐MoranM. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 308–331.doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005493
74.
WebberS. S. (2008). Development of cognitive and affective trust in teams: A longitudinal study. Small group research, 39(6), 746–769.
75.
WilsonJ. M.StrausS. G.McEvilyB. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 16–33.doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.001
76.
YangJ.MossholderK. W.PengT. K. (2009). Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 143–154.doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.009
77.
YasirM.ImranR.IrshadM. K.MohamadN. A.KhanM. M. (2016). Leadership styles in relation to employees’ trust and organizational change capacity: evidence from non-profit organizations. SAGE Open, 6(4), 1–12.
78.
ZayimM.KondakciY. (2015). An exploration of the relationship between readiness for change and organizational trust in Turkish public schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 610–625.doi:10.1177/1741143214523009
