Extant research indicates that principals are expected to serve as instructional leaders. Instructional leadership practices of principals in Israeli and US Jewish schools have, until recently, been unexplored. Therefore, this mixed-methodological study explores instructional leadership perceptions and behaviors among Israeli and US principals. Data, via questionnaires and interviews, were collected from 90 principals from each country. Findings suggest that US principals demonstrated significantly higher levels of instructional leadership. In both groups, women principals demonstrated higher levels of instructional leadership. Our interviews provided unique insights leading to our suggestions for ways of promoting greater attention to instructional leadership by principals of both countries.
ÄrlestigH., & TörnsenM. (2014). Classroom observations and supervision: Essential dimensions of pedagogical leadership.International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 856–868. doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2014-0001
2.
Avney Rosha – The Israel Institute for School Leadership (2008). Perception of the principal's role in the state of Israel: Report by the professional committee to formulate policy recommendations for the Ministry of Education.Jerusalem, Israel: Avney Rosha.
3.
BrazerS. D., & BauerS. C. (2013). Preparing instructional leaders: A model.Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(4), 645–684. doi: 10.1177/0013161X13478977
4.
CarterH. M. (2012). Institutionalization of caring in an era of accountability: Creating a supportive environment for at-risk students’ retention in high school and access to college.New Educator, 8(2), 177–193. doi: 10.1080/1547688X.2012.670568.
5.
ChenM. (1996). Academic preparation of principals in Israel: Empowering dynamic school leadership.International Journal of Educational Reform, 5(3), 287–296. doi:10.1007/s13384-011-0022-z
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
7.
ComberB., & NixonH. (2011). Critical reading comprehension in an era of accountability.Australian Educational Researcher, 38(2), 167–179. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/journal/13384.
8.
CottonK. (2003). Principals and student achievement.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches.Thousand Oaks, CA.Sage.
10.
Darling-HammondL., LaPointeM., MeyersonD., OrrM.T., & CohenC. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs.Stanford, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
11.
DeBevoiseW. (1984). Synthesis of research on the principal as instructional leader.Educational Leadership, 41(5), 14–20. doi: 10.1177/0013124588020003005.
12.
DeitcherH., & PomsonA. (2012). Jewish day schools worldwide: Achievement, challenges and aspirations.New York, NY: The Azrieli Papers, Yeshiva University.
13.
DevosG., & BouckenooghD. (2009). An exploratory study on principals’ conceptions about their role as school leaders.Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(2), 173–196. doi: 10.1080/15700760902737196.
14.
DiPaolaM. F., & WayneK. H. (2008). Principals improving instruction: Supervision, evaluation, and professional development.Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
15.
DuffyF. M. (2016). Organizational arrangements: Supervision and administration: Past, present, and future. In Glanz, & ZepedaS.J. (Eds.), Supervision: New perspectives for theory and practice. (pp. 81–96). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
16.
DwyerD. C. (1984). The search for instructional leadership: Routines and subtleties in the principal's role.Educational Leadership, 41(5), 32–37. doi:10.1177/0013161X03253412.
17.
FlickU. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
FosseyR., & ShohoA. (2012). Educational leadership preparation programs.Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 9(3), 3–11. doi: 10.1177/1555458906297707.
19.
FoxS. (2003). The art of translation. In FoxS., SchefflerI., & MaromD. (Eds.) Visions of Jewish education (pp. 253–295). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GibbsG. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data.London, UK: Sage.
Glanz. (2012). Improving instructional quality in Jewish Day Schools and Yeshivot.New York, NY: The Azrieli Papers, Yeshiva University.
23.
Glanz, & ZepedaS. (Eds.). (2016). Supervision: New perspectives for theory and practice.New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
24.
Grosser SassonD. (2016). Principals’ perceptions of their instructional leadership behaviors in Jewish day schools. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Yeshiva University, New York, NY.
25.
GuttermanJ. (2004). On the way to desirable preparation: Trends and changes in school principals’ preparation (Hebrew).Education and Related Issues, 26, 139–149.
26.
HallingerP. (2011). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 271–306. doi:10.1177/0013161X10383412.
27.
HallingerP. (2014). Reviewing reviews of research in educational leadership: An empirical assessment.Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 539–576. doi: 10.1177/0013161X13506594.
28.
HallingerP., & MurphyJ. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals.The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.331.
29.
HallingerP., & Murphy, (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away.Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239.
30.
HernandezR., RobertsM., & MenchacaV. (2012). Redesigning a principal preparation program: A continuous improvement model.International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 7(3). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/.
31.
HessF. M., & KellyA. P. (2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal preparation programs.Teachers College Record, 109(1), 244–274. doi: 10.1080/00405840802329425.
32.
HoltzB. W., DorphG. Z., & GoldringE. B., (1997). Educational leaders as teacher educators: The teacher educator institute—a case from Jewish education.Peabody Journal of Education, 72(2), 147–166.
33.
IngM. (2008). Using informal classroom observations to improve instruction: Describing variability across schools. School Leadership Research, Working Paper 08-1. Stanford, CA: Institute for Research on Education Policy and Practice.
34.
JacobsJ., BurnsR.W., & Yendol-HoppeyD. (2015). The inequitable influence that varying accountability contexts in the United States have on teacher professional development.Professional Development in Education, 41(5), 849–872. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.994657
35.
JenningsJ. L. (2010). School choice or schools’ choice? Managing in an era of accountability.Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247. doi: 10.1177/0038040710375688.
36.
KidronY., GreenbergA., & SchneiderM. (2015). Educational leadership in Jewish day schools. Report commissioned by the Consortium for Applied Research. Retrieved from www.casje.org.
37.
KramerM. N. (2000). The pathway for preparation: A study of heads of Jewish community day schools affiliated with the Jewish community day school network, 1998–1999. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI 9959342).
38.
KlarH.W., HugginsK.S., & RoesslerA.P. (2016). Fostering distributed instructional leadership: A strategy for supporting teacher learning. In Glanz, & ZepedaS. J. (Eds.), Supervision: New perspectives for theory and practice. (pp. 7–22). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
39.
LeithwoodK. A., & JantziD. (1997). Explaining variation in teachers’ perceptions of principals’ leadership: a replication.Journal of Educational Administration, 35(4), 312–331. doi.org/10.1108/09578239710171910.
40.
LeithwoodK. A., Seashore-LouisK., AndersonS., & WahlstromS. (2004). How leadership influences student learning.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
41.
LevinsonM. (2011). Democracy, accountability, and education.Theory and Research in Education, 9(2), 125–144. doi: 10.1177/1477878511409622.
42.
MarksH. M., & PrintyS. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397. doi: 10.1177/0013161X03253412.
43.
MarshallK. (2009). Rethinking teacher supervision and evaluation.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44.
MarshallC., & RossmanG. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Marzano, (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
46.
MarzanoR. J., WatersT., & McNultyB. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results.Aurora, CO: McREL.
47.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
MilesM. B., HubermanM. A., & SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
MitchellC., & CastleJ. B. (2005). The instructional role of elementary school principals.Canadian Journal of Education, 28(3), 409–433. doi: 10.2307/4126477.
50.
NeumerskiC. M. (2012). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347. doi: 10.1177/0013161X03253412.
51.
O'DonnellR. J., & WhiteG. P. (2005). Within the accountability era: Principals’ instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement.NASSP Bulletin, 89(645), 56–71. doi: 10.1177/019263650508964505.
52.
OplatkaI., & WaiteD. (2010). The new principal preparation program model in Israel: Ponderings about practice-oriented principal training.Advances in Educational Administration, 11, 47–66. doi: 1479-3660(2010)0000011.
53.
PenlingtonC., KingtonA., & DayC. (2008). Leadership in improving schools: A qualitative perspective.School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 65–82. doi:10.1080/13632430701799718.
54.
PerlL. B. (2011). Connecting leadership, professional development and school improvement: A principal's journey at a modern orthodox Jewish elementary school. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI 3484219).
55.
PrintyS. (2010). Principals’ influence on instructional quality: Insights from US schools.School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 111–126. doi: 10.1007/s12564-009-9013-4.
56.
RichardsL., & MorseJ. M. (2013). Readme first for a user's guide to qualitative methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
RigbyJ. G. (2014). Three logics of instructional leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 610–644. doi: 10.1177/0013161X13509379.
58.
RossmanG. B., & RallisS. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
RousB. (2004). Perspectives of teachers about instructional supervision and behaviors that influence preschool instruction.Journal of Early Intervention, 26(4), 266–283. doi: 10.1177/105381510402600403.
60.
RebhunU., & LevyS. (2006). Unity and diversity: Jewish identification in America and Israel 1990–2000.Sociology of Religion, 67(4), 391–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00746.x.
61.
SchickM. (2007). A survey of day school principals in the United States.New York, NY: Avi Chai Foundation.
62.
SergiovanniT. J., & StarrattR. J. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
63.
ShakedH. (2014). Israel's principal preparation policy.World Journal of Education, 4(6), 78–89. doi: 10.5430/wje.v4n6p78.
64.
SmylieM. A., & WenzelS. A. (2003). The Chicago Annenberg Challenge: Successes, failures, and lessons for the future.Chicago, IL: Final Technical Report of the Chicago Annenberg Research Project.
65.
StodolskyS. S., DorphG. Z., & Feiman-NemserS. (2006). Professional culture and professional development in Jewish schools: Teachers’ perceptions and experiences.Journal of Jewish Education, 72(2), 91–108. doi: 10.1080/00216240600561866.
66.
SullivanS., & Glanz. (2013). Supervision that improves teaching and learning: Strategies and techniques (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Corwin Press.
67.
TashakkoriA., & TeddlieC. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavior sciences.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
WahlstromK. L., & LouisK. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility.Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495.
69.
WahlstromK.L. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning.University of Toronto: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
70.
WatersT., MarzanoR.T., & McNultyB. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement: A working paper.Aurora, CO: Mid-Continental Regional Educational Lab.
71.
WertheimerJ. (1999). Jewish education in the United States: Recent trends andissues. American Jewish Year Book, 99, 3–115.
72.
WestA., MatteiP., & RobertsJ. (2011). Accountability and sanctions in English schools.British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(1), 41–62. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2010.529416.
73.
WolffL., & BreitE. (2012). Education in Israel: The challenges ahead. Research Paper 8. The Gildenhorn Institute for Israel Studies (GIIS). University of Maryland.
74.
YlimakiR. M. (Ed.). (2014). The new instructional leadership: ISLLC Standard Two.New York, NY: Routledge.
75.
ZepedaS. J. (2012). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts (3rd ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
