ArumS., & Van de WaterJ. (1992). The need for a definition of international education in U.S. universities. In KlasekC. B. (Ed.), Bridges to the future: Strategies for internationalizing higher education (pp. 191–203). Washington, DC: Association of International Education Administrators.
3.
Association of International Education Administrators. (1989). Guidelines for international education at U.S. colleges and universities.Washington, DC: Association of International Education Administrators.
4.
BirnbaumR. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BrintS., & KarabelJ. (1991). Institutional origins and transformations: The case of American community colleges. In PowellW. W., & DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 337–360). Chicago: University of Chicago.
6.
DaftR. (1998). Organization theory and design (6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
7.
DaviesJ. (1992). Developing a strategy for internationalization in universities: Towards a conceptual framework. In KlasekC. B. (Ed.), Bridges to the future: Strategies for internationalizing higher education (pp. 177–190). Washington, DC: Association of International Education Administrators.
8.
DiMaggioP. J. (1983). State expansion and organizational fields. In HallR. H., & QuinnR. E. (Eds.), Organizational theory and public policy (pp. 147–161). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
DiMaggioP. J., & PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
10.
DiMaggioP. J., & PowellW. W. (1991). Introduction. In PowellW. W., & DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–40). Chicago: University of Chicago.
11.
EmersonM. L., & NewsomR. W. (1995). Further defining the role of the community college: A model taxonomy for international programs.Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 19(6), 501–516.
12.
EngbergD., & GreenM. (2002). Promising practices: Spotlighting excellence in comprehensive internationalization.Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
13.
GladieuxL. E., & KingJ. E. (1999). The federal government and higher education. In AltbachP. G., BerdahlR. O., & GumportP. J. (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century (pp. 151–182). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
GreenM., & OlsonC. (2003). Internationalizing the campus: A user's guide.Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
15.
HannanM. T., & FreemanJ. H. (1977). The population ecology of organizations.American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.
16.
Harvard University Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (2004). A report on the Harvard college curricular review.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
17.
HavemanH. A. (1993). Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets.Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 593–627.
18.
HawleyA. (1968). Human ecology. In SillsD. L. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 328–337). New York: Macmillan.
19.
HaywardF., & SiayaL. (2001). Public experience, attitudes, and knowledge: A report on two national surveys about international education.Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
20.
HuismanJ. (1998). Differentiation and diversity in higher education systems. In SmartJ. S. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 13) (pp. 75–110). New York: Agathon.
Institute of International Education. (2004). Open doors: Report on international educational exchange. Retrieved November 26, 2004, from http://opendoors.iienetwork.org
23.
KlasekC. B. (Ed.). (1992). Bridges to the future: Strategies for internationalizing higher education.Washington, DC: Association of International Education Administrators.
KnightJ. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales.Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31.
27.
LacyW. B. (2004, Fall). The seven habits of highly effective universities: Enhancing international learning, discovery and engagement.IIE Networker, 40–42.
28.
LevyD. C. (2004). The new institutionalism: Mismatches with private higher education's global growth. InProgram for Research on Private Higher Education Working Paper #3. Retrieved November 22, 2004, from www.albany.edu/~prophe/publication/InstitutionalismWP3.htm.
29.
McGuinnessA. C.Jr. (1999). The states and higher education. In AltbachP. G., BerdahlR. O., & GumportP. J. (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century (pp. 183–215). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
MeekV. L., GoedegebuureL., KivinenO., & RinneR. (1996). The mockers and mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education.Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
31.
MeyerJ. W., & RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
32.
MeyerJ. W., & ScottW. R. (1991). Organizational environments.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
MeyerJ. W., ScottW. R., & DealT. E. (1992). Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations. In MeyerJ. W., & ScottW. R. (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (Upd. ed., pp. 45–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
MillhouseV. H. (1994). A conceptual model of an institute of international education.International Education, 24, 46–59.
National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. (2004). A call to leadership: The presidential role in internationalizing the university: A report of the NASULGC task force on international education.New York: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
37.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Digest of education statistics.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
38.
PerrowC. (1972). Complex organizations: A critical essay.New York: Newbury Award Records.
SchoormanD. (2000). What really do we mean by “internationalization”?Contemporary Education, 71(4), 5–12.
41.
ScottW. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In PowellW. W., & DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 164–182). Chicago: University of Chicago.
42.
ScottW. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43.
ScottW. R., & MeyerJ. W. (1992). The organization of societal sectors. In MeyerJ. W., & ScottW. R. (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (Upd. ed., pp. 129–154). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
SiayaL., & HaywardF. (2003). Mapping internationalization on US campuses: Final report.Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
45.
SinghJ. V., TuckerD. J., & MeinhardA. G. (1991). Institutional change and ecological dynamics. In PowellW. W., & DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 390–422). Chicago: University of Chicago.
46.
ZuckerL. (1983). Organizations as institutions. In BacharachS. B. (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 1–42). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
47.
ZuckerL. (1987). Institutional theories of organization.Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.