Scholars often frame governance as fraught with paradoxes. However, few have harnessed recent advances in paradox research to theorize governance paradoxes. This study addresses that gap by developing an empirically based conceptualization of governance paradoxes. It is derived from a 10-year case study of a major healthcare partnership, investigated qualitatively through document analysis and interviews. Existing literature primarily treats governance paradoxes as something puzzling or focuses on only one aspect of the two definitional characteristics of paradoxes: the tensions and the responses. We extend a dual framework that examines the tensions defining key governance demarcations in organizational purpose and decision structures, as well as the patterns of decision-makers’ responses, which evolve in response to crises and environmental shifts. This approach extends the scholarly conversation on governance through the lens of paradox and may help enhance decision-makers’ understanding of and engagement with complex governance dynamics.
AndriopoulosC.GotsiM. (2017). Methods of paradox. In SmithW. K.LewisM. W.JarzabkowskiP.LangleyA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox (pp. 513–529). Oxford University Press.
2.
AndriopoulosC.LewisM. W. (2009). Exploitation–exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
3.
AubertB. A.KishoreR.IriyamaA. (2015). Exploring and managing the “innovation through outsourcing” paradox. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(4), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.10.003
4.
BensonJ. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391741
BertiM.CunhaM. P. e. (2023). Paradox, dialectics or trade-offs? A double loop model of paradox. Journal of Management Studies, 60(4), 861–888.https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12899
7.
BevirM. (2009). Key concepts in governance. Sage Publications.
8.
BorzilloS.ProbstG.RaischS. (2008). The governance paradox: Balancing autonomy and control in managing communities of practice. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2008(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2008.33716799
9.
BundersD. J.De MoorT. (2024). Paradoxical tensions as a double-edged sword: Analysing the development of platform cooperatives in the European gig economy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 33(4), 366–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926231202422
10.
BurauV. (2007). The complexity of governance change: Reforming the governance of medical performance in Germany. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 2(4), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133107004264
11.
CameronK. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.539
12.
CameronK.QuinnR. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Jossey-Bass.
13.
CornforthC. (2001). Understanding the governance of non-profit organizations: Multiple perspectives and paradoxes. Paper presented at the 30th Annual ARNOVA Conference, Miami, FL.
14.
CornforthC. (2004). The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: A paradox perspective. Annals of Public & Cooperative Economics, 75(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x
15.
CrossanM.CunhaM. P.VeraD.CunhaJ. (2005). Time and organizational improvisation. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281441
16.
CunhaM. P. e.LeiteA. N.RegoA.Hernández-LinaresR. (2024). Visibilizing and managing paradox: Redefining the role of non-executive directors. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(5), 1156–1170. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2023-0038
17.
CunhaM. P. e.RegoA.CleggS.JarvisW. (2021). Stewardship as process: A paradox perspective. European Management Journal, 39(2), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.006
18.
De KeyserB.GuietteA.VandenbemptK. (2019). On the use of paradox for generating theoretical contributions in management and organization research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12201
DewaldJ. R.HallJ.ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W. (2007). The governance paradox: Preferences of small vulnerable firms in the homebuilding industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(2), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00173.x
21.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
EmirbayerM.MischeA. (1998). What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
24.
FairhurstG. T.PutnamL. L. (2019). An integrative methodology for organizational oppositions: Aligning grounded theory and discourse analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4), 917–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118776771
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
27.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
28.
GrönholmS. (2022). Experimental governance and urban climate action—A mainstreaming paradox?Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100139
29.
HargraveT. J.Van de VenA. H. (2017). Integrating dialectical and paradox perspectives on managing contradictions in organizations. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616640843
30.
HöglundL.Holmgren CaicedoM.MårtenssonM. (2015). Managing paradoxes in governance: Tensions in the emergence of a new board. In GnanL.HinnaA.MonteduroF. (Eds.), Contingency, behavioural and evolutionary perspectives on public and nonprofit governance (pp. 3–30). Emerald Group Publishing.
31.
HowardL. A.GeistP. (1995). Ideological positioning in organizational change: The dialectic of control in a merging organization. Communication Monographs, 62(2), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376352
32.
JarzabkowskiP.BednarekR.ChalkiasK.CacciatoriE. (2022). Enabling rapid financial response to disasters: Knotting and reknotting multiple paradoxes in interorganizational systems. Academy of Management Journal, 65(5), 1477–1506. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0745
33.
JarzabkowskiP.BednarekR.LêJ. (2018). Studying paradox as process and practice. In FarjounM.SmithW. K.LangleyA.TsoukasH. (Eds.), Dualities, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizational life (pp. 175–194). Oxford University Press.
34.
JarzabkowskiP.LeJ. K.Van de VenA. H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 245–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013481016
35.
JayJ. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772
36.
JohansenJ. H. (2018). Paradox Management: Contradictions and Tensions in Complex Organizations. Springer.
37.
KellerJ.CarmineS.JarzabkowskiP.LewisM. W.PradiesC.SharmaG.SmithW. K.VinceR. (2021). Our collective tensions: Paradox research community’s response to COVID-19. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492620986859
38.
KranzJ. (2021). Strategic innovation in IT outsourcing: Exploring the differential and interaction effects of contractual and relational governance mechanisms. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 30(1), Article 101656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101656
39.
KreutzerK.JacobsC. D. (2011). Balancing control and coaching in CSO governance: A paradox perspective on board behavior. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4), 613–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9212-6
40.
KroghA.ThygesenS. A. (2022). Project and process management of public–private partnerships: Managerial tensions and coping strategies. Administration & Society, 54(10), 1993–2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997221100393
41.
LangleyA.SmallmanC.TsoukasH.Van de VenA. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001
42.
LewisM. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. https://doi.org/10.2307/259204
43.
MartynK. S. (2006). Decision-making in a corporate boardroom: Inside the black box [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
44.
MichaudM.AudebrandL. K. (2022). One governance theory to rule them all? The case for a paradoxical approach to co-operative governance. Journal of Co-Operative Organization and Management, 10(1), Article 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2021.100151
45.
MichaudV. (2013). Mediating the paradoxes of organizational governance through numbers. Organization Studies, 35(1), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613495335
46.
MorganG. (1986). Images of organization. Sage Publications.
47.
PattonM. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189–1208.
48.
PetersB. G.PierreJ. (2017). The next public administration: Debates and dilemmas. Sage Publications.
49.
PfistererS.van TulderR. (2020). Navigating governance tensions to enhance the impact of partnerships with the private sector for the SDGs. Sustainability, 13(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010111
50.
PooleM. S.Van de VenA. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578. https://doi.org/10.2307/258559
51.
PutnamL. L.FairhurstG. T.BanghartS. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421
52.
QuinnR. E.CameronK. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.1.33
53.
RaischS.HargraveT. J.Van de VenA. H. (2018). The learning spiral: A process perspective on paradox. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8), 1507–1526. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12397
54.
SarmahJ. K. (2015). Autonomy question and local governance paradox: Alternative intra-federal de-territorialized model. In Goswami (Ed.), Troubled diversity: The political process in Northeast India (pp. 122–139). Oxford Academic.
55.
SchadJ.BansalP. (2018). Seeing the forest and the trees: How a systems perspective informs paradox research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8), 1490–1506. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12398
56.
SchadJ.LewisM. W.RaischS.SmithW. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422
57.
SeoM.CreedW. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134353
58.
SerrettaH.BendixenM.SutherlandM. (2011). Core corporate governance dilemmas facing boards: A South African perspective. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 12(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v12i2.276
59.
SheepM. L.FairhurstG. T.KhazanchiS. (2017). Knots in the discourse of innovation: Investigating multiple tensions in a reacquired spin-off. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616640845
60.
SimpsonA. V.BertiM. (2020). Transcending organizational compassion paradoxes by enacting wise compassion courageously. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618821188
61.
SmetsM.JarzabkowskiP. (2013). Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66(10), 1279–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712471407
62.
SmetsM.JarzabkowskiP.BurkeG. T.SpeeP. (2015). Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 932–970. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0638
63.
SmithK. K.BergD. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. Jossey-Bass.
64.
SmithW. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0932
65.
SmithW. K.LewisM. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223
66.
SundaramurthyC.LewisM. W. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040729
67.
TanakaT.TakashinaN. (2023). Governance paradox: Implications from Japan’s national parks for managing complex protected areas. Sustainability Science, 18(4), 1995–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01332-1
68.
TorfingJ.AndersenL. B.GreveC.KlausenK. K. (2020). Public governance paradigms: Competing and co-existing. Edward Elgar Publishing.
69.
TuckermannH. (2019). Visibilizing and invisibilizing paradox: A process study of interactions in a hospital executive board. Organization Studies, 40(12), 1851–1872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618800100
