This study explores the various tactics sustainable entrepreneurs use to meet the challenges associated with creating social and environmental solutions. Although often theorized as market imperfections, in this study, opportunities are considered as situations that allow things to be done differently within social settings. This approach opens up for research into the everyday practice of sustainable entrepreneurship and how sustainable entrepreneurs strive to find new solutions to counteract ecological degradation. To develop this view, I analyze the different entrepreneurial tactics actors employ to advance green architecture in the Danish construction industry. Rather than place an analytic emphasis on the end result of sustainable entrepreneurship, I suggest that the processes of developing solutions aimed at generating simultaneous economic, social and environmental value might warrant greater attention.
AllenS.MarshallJ.Easterby-SmithM. (2015). Living with contradictions: The dynamics of senior managers’ identity tensions in relation to sustainability. Organization & Environment, 28(3), 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575048
2.
AlvarezS. A.BarneyJ. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4
3.
AnandA.ArgadebP.BarkemeyerR.SalignacF. (2021). Trends and patterns in sustainable entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric review and research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(3), 106092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106092
4.
BelzF. M.BinderJ. K. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1887
5.
BendellB.SullivanD. M.OrnsteinS. (2020). How fear of “looming megacatastrophes” alters entrepreneurial activity rates through psychological distance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(4), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2019.0049
6.
BuchananI. (2000). Michel de certeau – cultural theorist. Sage.
7.
ClarkeJ.HoltR. (2009). The mature entrepreneur: A narrative approach to entrepreneurial goals. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492609343030
8.
CohenB.WinnM. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001
9.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
10.
CrawfordG. C.DimovD.McKelveyB. (2016). Realism, empiricism, and fetishism in the study of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(2), 168–170.https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492615601506
11.
DammannS.ElleM. (2006). Environmental indicators: Establishing a common language for green building. Building Research & Information,34(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210600766377
12.
DaskalakiM.HjorthD.MairJ. (2015). Are entrepreneurship, communities, and social transformation related?Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4), 419–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492615579012
13.
DeanT. J.McMullenJ. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003
14.
De CerteauM. (1984). The practice of everyday life [Translated by Steven Rendall]. University of California Press.
GuyS.FarmerG. (2001). Reinterpreting sustainable architecture: The place of technology. Journal of Architectural Education,54(3), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1162/10464880152632451
19.
HjorthD. (2004). Creating space for play/invention – concepts of space and organizational entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,16(5), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/0898562042000197144
20.
HjorthD. (2005). Organizational entrepreneurship: With de Certeau on creating heterotopias (or spaces for play). Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605280225
21.
HjorthD.HoltR.SteyaertC. (2015). Entrepreneurship and process studies. International Small Business Journal, 33(6), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615583566
22.
HoogendoornB.van der ZwanP.ThurikR. (2019). Sustainable entrepreneurship: The role of perceived barriers and risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 175(4), 1133–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3646-8
JohnsenC. G. (2021). Sustainability beyond instrumentality: Towards an immanent ethics of organizational environmentalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 172(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04411-5
25.
JohnsenC. G.OlaisonL.SørensenB. M. (2018). Put your style at stake: A new use of sustainable entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 39(2–3), 144–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717551
26.
KibertC. J. (2012). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. Wiley.
27.
KorsgaardS.AndersonA.GaddeforsJ. (2016). Entrepreneurship as re-sourcing: Towards a new image of entrepreneurship in a time of financial, economic and socio-spatial crisis. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 10(2), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2014-0002
28.
LindgreenA.Di BenedettoC. A.BeverlandM. B. (2021). How to write up case-study methodology sections. Industrial Marketing Management, 96, A7–A10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.012
29.
McKeeverE.JackS.AndersonA. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.002
30.
MuñozP.CohenB. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship research: Taking stock and looking ahead. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3), 300–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2000
31.
MuñozP.DimovD. (2015). The call of the whole in understanding the development of sustainable ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.012
32.
NascimentoL. D. S.SteinbruchF. K. (2019). “The interviews were transcribed”, but how? Reflections on management research. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0092
33.
NascimentoL. S.SalazarV. S. (2020). Overcoming the theoretical duality on social enterprise formation. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(3), 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-12-2019-0187
34.
O’NeillK.GibbsD. (2016). Rethinking green entrepreneurship – fluid narratives of the green economy. Environment and Planning A, 48(9), 1727–1749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16650453
35.
OutsiosG.KittlerM. (2017). The mindset of UK environmental entrepreneurs: A habitus perspective. International Small Business Journal, 36(3), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242617739343
36.
ParkinsonC.HoworthD. (2008). The language of social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 20(3), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620701800507
PhillipsM. (2013). On being green and being enterprising: Narrative and the ecopreneurial self. Organization, 20(6), 794–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412455084
ShepherdD. A.PatzeltH.BaronR. A. (2013). “I care about nature, but …”: Disengaging values in assessing opportunities that cause harm. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1251–1273. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0776
41.
SpinosaC.FloresF.DreyfusH. L. (1999). Disclosing new worlds: Entrepreneurship, democratic action, and the cultivation of solidarity. The MIT Press.
42.
StarkeyK.CraneA. (2003). Toward green narrative: Management and the evolutionary epic. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040710
43.
SteyaertC. (2007). Of course that is not the whole (toy) story: Entrepreneurship and the cat’s cradle. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.10.004
44.
SuddabyR.BrutonG. D.SiS. X. (2015). Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: Insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.003
45.
Terán-YépezE.Marín-CarrilloG. M.del Pilar Casado-BelmonteM.de las Mercedes Capobianco-UriarteM. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Review of its evolution and new trends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119742
46.
TracyS. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
47.
VerduijnK. (2015). Entrepreneuring and process. A Lefebvrian perspective. International Small Business Journal,33(6), 638–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614559059
48.
WelterF.BakerT.AudretschD. B.GartnerW. B. (2017). Everyday entrepreneurship – A call for entrepreneurship to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12258
49.
YorkJ. G.VenkataramanS. (2010). The entrepreneur–environment nexus: Uncertainty, innovation, and allocation. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.007
