Davis's (1971) article “That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology” is regarded by many management researchers as a classic work and a basis for guiding management studies; in the wake of its publication, an interesting research advocacy gradually emerged. However, from the perspective of scientific research, Davis's core argument that great theories have to be interesting is seriously flawed. Interestingness is not regarded as a virtue of a good scientific theory and thus has little value in science. Moreover, obsession with interestingness can lead to at least five detrimental outcomes, namely promoting an improper way of doing science, encouraging post hoc hypothesis development, discouraging replication studies, ignoring the proper duties of a researcher, and undermining doctoral education.
AllaisL. (2015). Manifest reality: Kant’s idealism and his realism. Oxford University Press.
2.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2013b). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. Sage.
3.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2013a). Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 128–152.
4.
BabaV. V. (2016). On business theory and influential scholarship: What makes research interesting?Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 33(4), 268–276.
5.
BarkemaH. G.VermeulenF. (1998). International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 7–26.
6.
BarleyS. R. (2006). When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 16–20.
7.
BartunekJ. M.RynesS. L.IrelandR. D. (2006). What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter?Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 9–15.
8.
BettisR. A. (2012). The search for asterisks: Compromised statistical tests and flawed theories. Strategic Management Journal, 33(1), 108–113.
9.
BettisR. A.EthirajS.GambardellaA.HelfatC.MitchellW. (2016). Creating repeatable cumulative knowledge in strategic management: A call for a broad and deep conversation among authors, referees, and editors. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 257–261.
10.
BhaskarR. (1978). A realist theory of science. Harvester Press.
11.
BhaskarR. (1998). The possibility of naturalism (3rd ed). Routledge.
12.
BraudeS. E. (1979). ESP And psychokinesis. A philosophical examination. Temple University Press.
13.
BriefA. P. (2001). Organizational behavior and the study of affect: Keep your eyes on the organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 131–139.
14.
CachonG. P. (2012). What is interesting in operations management?Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 14(2), 166–169.
15.
CannellaA. A. J.PaetzoldR. L. (1994). Pfeffer's barriers to the advance of organizational science: A rejoinder. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 331–341.
16.
ChalmersA. F. (2013). What is this thing called science? (4th ed.). University of Queensland Press.
17.
ChristensenG.MiguelE. (2018). Transparency, reproducibility, and the credibility of economics research. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(3), 920–980.
18.
CohenB. A. (2017). How should novelty be valued in science?Elife, 6, e28699.
19.
ColquittJ. A.GeorgeG. (2011). Publishing in AMJ ( part 1: Topic choice. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 432–435.
20.
CorbettA.CornelissenJ.DeliosA.HarleyB. (2014). Variety, novelty, and perceptions of scholarship in research on management and organizations: An appeal for ambidextrous scholarship. Journal of Management Studies, 51(1), 3–18.
21.
CortinaJ. M. (2016). Defining and operationalizing theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(8), 1142–1149.
22.
DanermarkB.EkstrőmM.JakobsenL.KarlssonJ. C. (2002). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. Routledge.
23.
DasH.LongB. S. (2010). What makes management research interesting?: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(1), 127–144.
24.
DavisM. S. (1971). That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344.
25.
DavisM. S. (1999). Aphorisms and clichés: The generation and dissipation of conceptual charisma. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 245–269.
26.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M. (2006). The relational foundation of research: An underappreciated dimension of interesting research. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 21–26.
27.
EdenD.RynesS. (2003). Publishing across borders: Furthering the internationalization of AMJ. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 679–683.
28.
FayolleA.LandstromH.GartnerW. B.BerglundK. (2016). The institutionalization of entrepreneurship: Questioning the status quo and re-gaining hope for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(7-8), 477–486.
29.
FinocchiaroM. A. (2013). Meta-argumentation: An approach to logic and argumentation theory. College Publications.
30.
FrankH.LandströmH. (2016). What makes entrepreneurship research interesting? Reflections on strategies to overcome the rigour–relevance gap. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(1-2), 51–75.
31.
GoldfarbB.KingA. A. (2016). Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: Significance tests & mistaken inference. Strategic Management Journal, 37(1), 167–176.
32.
GoodayG. (2012). “Vague and artificial”: The historically elusive distinction between pure and applied science. Isis; An International Review Devoted To the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, 103(3), 546–554.
33.
GrayK.WegnerD. M. (2013). Six guidelines for interesting research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 549–553.
34.
HarréR.SecondP. F. (1972). The explanation of social behavior. Basil Blackwell.
35.
HarzingA. W. (2016). Why replication studies are essential: Learning from failure and success. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(4), 563–568.
36.
HempelC. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. Free Press.
37.
IsaacsonW. (2008). Einstein: His life and universe. Simon and Schuster.
38.
KahnemanD.SibonyO.SunsteinC. R. (2021). Noise: A flaw in human judgment. Little, Brown Spark.
39.
KerrN. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217.
40.
KerrS. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 769–783.
41.
KilduffM. (2006). Editor's comments: Publishing theory. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 252–255.
42.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
43.
LandströmH.HarirchiG. (2019). “That’s interesting!” in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(sup 2), 507–529.
44.
LewisM. (2017). The undoing project: A friendship that changed the world. W. W. Norton.
45.
MaddoxJ. (1989). What to say about cold fusion. Nature, 338(6218), 701.
46.
MäkiU. (2000). Kinds of assumptions and their truth: Shaking an untwisted F-twist. Kyklos, 53(3), 317–336.
47.
McMullinE. (2008). The virtues of a good theory. In PsillosS.CurdM. (Eds.), The routledge companion to philosophy of science (pp. 498–508). Routledge.
48.
MooreG. E. (1959). Philosophical papers. Allen and Unwin.
49.
PerrowC. (1994). Pfeffer slips! Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 191–194.
50.
PfefferJ. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599–620.
51.
PillutlaM. M.ThauS. (2013). Organizational sciences’ obsession with “that’s interesting!” consequences and an alternative. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 187–194.
52.
PodsakoffP. M.PodsakoffN. P.MishraP.EscueC. (2018). Can early-career scholars conduct impactful research? Playing “small ball” versus “swinging for the fences”. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(4), 496–531.
53.
PopperK. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchison.
54.
RosenthalR. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641.
55.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. McGraw-Hill.
56.
RussellB. (1906). On the nature of truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 7, 28–49.
57.
RynesS. L. (2005). Taking stock and looking ahead. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 9–15.
58.
SalvatoC.AldrichH. E. (2012). “That’s interesting!” in family business research. Family Business Review, 25(2), 125–135.
59.
SayerA. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed). Routledge.
60.
ShortJ. (2009). The art of writing a review article. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1312–1317.
61.
ShuganS. M. (2003). Defining interesting research problems. Marketing Science, 22(1), 1–15.
62.
SimonsD. J. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 76–80.
63.
SmithD. C. (2003). The importance and challenges of being interesting. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3), 319–322.
64.
StackmanR. W.de HolanM.ArgyresP.CabralN.MoliternoS.StonerT. P.& WalshJ.PJ. (2019). Dialogue as renounced aggression: JMI and the case of AOM’s president’s response to EO13769. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(3), 268–275.
65.
TaylorF. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. Harper and Brothers Publishers.
66.
ThomasD. (1979). Naturalism and social science: A post-empiricist philosophy of social science. Cambridge University Press.
67.
TihanyiL. (2020). From “that’s interesting” to “that’s important”. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 329–331.
68.
TsangE. W. K. (2006). Behavioral assumptions and theory development: The case of transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 999–1011.
69.
TsangE. W. K. (2017). The philosophy of management research. Routledge.
70.
TsangE. W. K.FreyB. S. (2007). The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 128–136.
71.
TsangE. W. K.KwanK. M. (1999). Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 759–780.
72.
TsangE. W. K.YamanoiJ. (2016). International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A replication. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2291–2306.
73.
Understanding Science. Cold fusion: A case study for scientific behavior. (https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/cold_fusion_01).
74.
Van de VenA. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press.
75.
Van MaanenJ. (1995). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6(1), 133–143.
76.
VermeulenF. (2005). On rigor and relevance: Fostering dialectic progress in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 978–982.
77.
VossG. B. (2003). Formulating interesting research questions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3), 356–359.
78.
WrightT. A.SweeneyD. A. (2016). The call for an increased role of replication, extension, and mixed-methods study designs in organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(3), 480–486.
