BallooK.PauliR.WorrellM. (2016). Individual differences in psychology undergraduates’ development of research methods knowledge and skills. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 790–800.
4.
BanyardP.GraysonA. (1999). Teaching with original sources. In PerlmanB.McCannL. I.McFaddenS. F. (Eds.), Lessons learned: Practical advice for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 29–36). American Psychological Association.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally.
7.
Chatterjee-PadmanabhanM.NielsonW.SandersS. (2019). Joining the research conversation: Threshold concepts embedded in the literature review. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(3), 494–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1545747
8.
CohenR. J.SwerdlikM. E.SturmanE. D. (2013). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (8th ed.). McGraw Hill.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.
11.
GubaE. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 29(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
12.
KailR.ParkY. (1992). Global developmental change in processing time. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 525–541.
13.
KileyM. (2015). ‘I didn’t have a clue what they were talking about’: PhD candidates and theory. Innovations in Teaching International, 52(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981835
14.
KileyM.MullinsG. (2005). Supervisors’ conceptions of research: What are they?Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500109550
15.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
16.
MaxwellJ. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033002003
17.
MeyerJ. H. F.ShanahanM. P.LaugkschR. C. (2005). Students’ conceptions of research. I: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500109535
18.
MeyerJ. H. F.ShanahanM. P.LaugkschR. C. (2007). Students’ conceptions of research. 2: An exploration of contrasting patterns of variation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(4), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830701485627
19.
NimonK. (2017). HRDQ submissions of quantitative research reports: Three common elements in decision letters and a checklist. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28(3), 281–298. https://doi-org.ezproxy.fiu.edu/10.1002/hrdq.21290
PyhaltöK.ToomA.StubbJ.LonkaK. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being. ISRN Education, 2012(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/934941
22.
ReioT., G.Jr.WernerJ. M. (2017). Publishing mixed methods research: Thoughts and recommendation concerning rigor. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28(4), 433–438. https://doi-org.ezproxy.fiu.edu/10.1002/hrdq.21291
23.
Sanders-ReioJ.AlexanderP. A.ReioT. G.Jr.NewmanI. (2014). Do students’ beliefs about writing relate to their writing self-efficacy, apprehension, and writing performance?Learning and Instruction, 33, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.02.001
24.
StoloffM. L.RogersS. (2004). Understanding psychology deeply through thinking, doing, writing. In PerlmanB.McCannL. I.McFaddenS. F. (Eds.), Lessons learned: Practical advice for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 221–230). American Psychological Association.
25.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2003). Issues and dilemmas in teaching research methods courses in social and behavioural sciences: US perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570305055
26.
VygotskyL. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.
27.
WangJ. (2018). Making a difference through quality manuscript review. Human Resource Development Review, 17(4), 339–348.
28.
WangL.CarrM. (2020). Understanding the relationship between spatial ability and mathematics achievement through the lens of information processing theory. North American Journal of Psychology, 22(2), 173–192.
29.
WoodD.BrunerJ. S.RossC. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(1), 89–100.