Concerns have been voiced in recent years about the widespread use of U.S.-dominated journal rankings in business schools. Such practice is seen to have the effect of spreading globally a U.S.-style scholarly monoculture and reconstituting other forms of scholarship as marginal and inferior. In this essay, we explore the ways in which the English language is implicated in these processes. Drawing on language-sensitive studies of academic work and our own experiences as nonnative speakers of English, we argue that the use of U.S.-dominated rankings is not just hierarchizing and homogenizing the global field of management but also contributing to its Englishization. This, we contend, furthers the homogenization of the field while also producing significant language-based inequalities and inducing demanding quasi-colonial forms of identity work by those being Englishized.
AlasuutariP. (2004). The globalization of qualitative research. In SealeC.GoboG.GubriumJ. F.SilvermanD. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 595-608). London: Sage.
2.
AlvessonM. (2013). Do we have something to say? From re-search to ROI-search and back again. Organization, 20, 79-90.
3.
AlvessonM.GabrielY. (2013). Beyond formulaic research: In praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12, 245-263.
4.
AshforthB. (2005). Becoming vanilla pudding: How we undermine our passion for research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 400-403.
5.
BellE.KothiyalN.WillmottH. (2017). Methodology-as-technique and the meaning of rigour in globalized management research. British Journal of Management, 28, 534-550.
6.
BellE.SinclairA. (2014). Reclaiming eroticism in the academy. Organization, 21, 268-280.
7.
BhabhaH. K. (1994). The location of culture. London, England: Routledge.
8.
BilligM. (2013). Learn to write badly: How to succeed in the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BoussebaaM. (2018). Book review on “Management Research: European Perspectives, Sabina Siebert (Ed.), in: Series: Routledge Studies in International Business and the World Economy, Routledge, London (2017), (252 pp. (hard cover), £105.00), ISBN: 9781138721463.”Journal of International Management, 24, 195-197
10.
BoussebaaM.BrownA. D. (2017). Englishization, identity regulation and imperialism. Organization Studies, 38, 7-29.
11.
BoussebaaM.SinhaS.GabrielY. (2014). Englishization in offshore call centers: A postcolonial perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 1152-1169.
12.
CassellC. (2016). European qualitative research: A celebration of diversity and a cautionary tale. European Journal of Management, 34, 453-456.
13.
ChoS. (2004). Challenges of entering discourse communities through publishing in English: Perspectives of non-native-speaking doctoral students in the United States of America. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 3(1), 47-72.
14.
CloutierC. (2016). How I write: An inquiry into the writing practices of academics. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25, 69-84.
15.
Czarniawska-JoergesB. (1995). Narration or science? Collapsing the division in organization studies. Organization, 2, 11-33.
16.
DaneE. (2011). Changing the tune of academic writing: Muting cognitive entrenchment. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 332-336.
17.
DescarriesF. (2003). The hegemony of the English language in the academy: The damaging impact of the sociocultural and linguistic barriers on the development of feminist sociological knowledge, theories and strategies. Current Sociology, 51, 625-636.
18.
GabrielY. (2010). Organization studies: A space for ideas, identities and agonies. Organization Studies, 31, 757-775.
GulatiR. (2007). Tent poles, tribalism and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 775-782.
22.
HarleyB. (2015). The one best way? “Scientific” research on HRM and the threat to critical scholarship. Human Resource Management Journal, 25, 1361-1363.
23.
HarleyB. (2019). Confronting the crisis of confidence in management studies: Why senior scholars need to stop setting a bad example. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 18, 286-297. doi:10.5465/amle.2018.0107
24.
HelinJ. (2015). Writing process after reading Bakhtin: From theorized plots to unfinalizable “Living” events. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 174-185.
25.
HelinJ. (2019). Dialogical writing: Co-inquiring between the written and the spoken word. Culture and Organization, 25, 1-15.
26.
HerbertA.TienariJ. (2013). Transplanting tenure and the (re)construction of academic freedoms. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 157-173.
27.
HöpflH. (2011). Women’s writing. In JeanesE. L.KnightsD.Yancey MartinP. (Eds.), Handbook of gender, work and organization (pp. 25-36). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
28.
HornS. A. (2017). Non-English nativeness as stigma in academic settings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16, 579-602.
29.
Ibarra-ColadoE. (2006). Organization studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: Thinking otherness from the margins. Organization, 13, 463-488.
30.
KallioK.-M.KallioT.TienariJ.HyvönenT. (2016). Ethos at stake: Performance management and academic work in universities. Human Relations, 69, 685-709.
31.
KhazraguiH.HudsonJ. (2015). Measuring the benefits of university research: Impact and the REF in the UK. Research Evaluation, 24(1), 51-62.
KosteraM. (1997). Personal performatives: Collecting poetical definitions of management. Organization, 4, 345-353.
34.
LundR. (2015). Doing the ideal academic: Gender, excellence and changing academia (Aalto University publication series, Doctoral Dissertations, 98/2015). Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University.
35.
LundR.TienariJ. (2018). Passion, care and eros in the gendered neoliberal university. Organization, 26, 98-121. doi:10.1177/1350508418805283
36.
MacdonaldS. (2015). Emperor’s new clothes: The reinvention of peer review as myth. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 264-279.
37.
MacdonaldS.KamJ. (2007). Ring a ring o’ roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 640-655.
38.
MacdonaldS.KamJ. (2011). The skewed few: People and papers of quality in management studies. Organization, 18, 467-475.
39.
MeierN.WegenerC. (2017). Writing with resonance. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26, 193-201.
40.
MeriläinenS.TienariJ.ThomasR.DaviesA. (2008). Hegemonic academic practices: Experiences of publishing from the periphery. Organization, 15, 629-642.
41.
MingersJ.WillmottH. (2013). Taylorising business school research: On the “one best way” performative effects of journal ranking lists. Human Relations, 66, 1051-1073.
42.
MurphyJ.ZhuJ. (2012). Neo-colonialism in the academy? Anglo-American domination in management journals. Organization, 19, 915-927.
43.
Özkazanc-PanB. (2012). Publishing without betrayal: Critical scholarship meets mainstream journals. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28, 209-217.
44.
PhillipsonR. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45.
PhillipsonR. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
PudelkoM.TenzerH. (2019). Boundaryless careers or career boundaries? The impact of language barriers on academic careers in international business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 18, 213-240. doi:10.5465/amle.2017.0236
47.
PullenA.RhodesC. (2015). Writing, the feminine and organization. Gender, Work & Organization, 22(2), 87-93.
48.
SiebertS. (Ed.). (2017). Routledge studies in international business and the world economy. Management research: European perspectives. London, England: Routledge.
49.
SliwaM.JohanssonM. (2015). Playing in the academic field: Non-native English-speaking academics in UK business schools. Culture and Organization, 21, 78-95.
50.
SteyaertC.JanssensM. (2013). Multilingual scholarship and the paradox of translation and language in management and organization studies. Organization, 20, 131-142.
51.
ThomasR.TienariJ.DaviesA.MeriläinenS. (2009). Let’s talk about “us”: A reflexive account of a cross-cultural research collaboration. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 313-324.
52.
TietzeS. (2017). Multilingual research, monolingual publications: Management scholarship in English only?European Journal of International Management, 12(1-2), 28-45.
53.
TietzeS.DickP. (2013). The victorious English language: Hegemonic practices in the management academy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22, 122-134.
54.
TourishD.WillmottH. (2015). In defiance of folly: Journal rankings, mindless measures and the ABS guide. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 26, 37-46.
55.
TownleyB. (1994). Writing in friendship. Organization, 1(1), 24-28.
56.
ÜsdikenB. (2010). Between contending perspectives and logics: Organizational studies in Europe. Organization Studies, 31, 715-735.
57.
ÜsdikenB. (2014). Centres and peripheries: Research styles and publication patterns in “top” US journals and their European alternatives, 1960-2010. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 764-789.
58.
WillmottH. (2011). Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS list. Organization, 18, 429-442.
59.
YlijokiO.-H.UrsinJ. (2013). The construction of academic identity in the changes of Finnish higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 1135-1149.
