Through a direct response to Willmott’s challenge to institutional theory’s critical potential, I show why and how it is possible for institutional theory to become more critical, while also respecting and maintaining important differences with critical theory.
AlvessonM.KarremanD. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53, 1125-1149.
2.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
3.
BreezeR. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 21, 493-525.
4.
CleggS. (2010). The state, power, and agency: Missing in action in institutional theory?Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 4-13.
5.
ContuA. (2008). Decaf resistance: On misbehavior, cynicism, and desire in liberal workplaces. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 364-379.
6.
CooperD. J.EzzamelM.WillmottH. (2008). Examining “institutionalization”: A critical theoretic perspective. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 673-701) London, England: Sage.
7.
CreedW. D.ScullyM. A.AustinJ. R. (2002). Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science, 13, 475-496.
8.
DavisG. F.MarquisC. (2005). Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organization Science, 16, 332-343.
9.
de RondM.LokJ. (2016). Some things can never be unseen: The role of context in psychological injury at war. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1965-1993.
10.
DoverG.LawrenceT. B. (2010). A gap year for institutional theory: Integrating the study of institutional work and participatory action research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 305-316.
11.
DriverM. (2013). The lack of power and the power of lack in leadership as a discursively constructed identity. Organization Studies, 34, 407-422.
12.
ElsbachK.D.SuttonR.I. (1992) Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 699-738.
13.
FournierV.GreyC. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53, 7-32.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
GillM. J.BurrowR. D. (2017). The function of fear in institutional maintenance: Feeling frightened as an essential ingredient in haute cuisine. Organization Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0170840617709306
17.
GlynosJ.StavrakakisY. (2004). Encounters of the real kind: Sussing out the limits of Laclau’s embrace of Lacan. In CritchleyS.MarchartO. (Eds.), Laclau: A critical reader (pp. 201-216). London, England: Routledge.
18.
GreenwoodR.OliverC.LawrenceT. B.MeyerR. E. (2017). Introduction: Into the fourth decade. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.LawrenceT. B.MeyerR. E. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 1-23). London, England: Sage.
19.
HardyC.PhillipsN. (1999). No joking matter: Discursive struggle in the Canadian refugee system. Organization Studies, 20, 1-24.
20.
HedströmP.SwedbergR. (Eds.) (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HirschP.LounsburyM. (2015). Toward a more critical and “powerful” institutionalism. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 96-99.
22.
HudsonB. A.OkhuysenG. A.CreedW. D. (2015). Power and institutions: Stones in the road and some yellow bricks. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 233-238.
23.
LaclauE.MouffeC. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Toward a radical democratic politics. London, England: Verso.
24.
LawrenceT. B. (2008). Power, institutions and organizations. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 170-197). London, England: Sage.
25.
LawrenceT. B.BuchananS. (2017). Power, institutions and organizations. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.LawrenceT. B.MeyerR. E. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 477-506). London, England: Sage.
26.
LawrenceT. B.DoverG. (2015). Place and institutional work creating housing for the hard-to-house. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 371-410.
27.
LokJ.WillmottH. (2006). Institutional theory, language, and discourse analysis: A comment on Phillips, Lawrence, and Hardy. Academy of Management Review, 31, 477-480.
28.
LokJ.WillmottH. (2014). Identities and identifications in organizations: Dynamics of antipathy, deadlock, and alliance. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23, 215-230.
29.
MaxwellJ. A. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
MeyerJ. W.JeppersonR. L. (2000). The “actors” of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18, 100-120.
31.
MüllerM. (2013). Lack and jouissance in hegemonic discourse of identification with the state. Organization, 20, 279-298.
32.
MunirK. A. (2015). A loss of power in institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 90-92.
33.
OakesL. S.TownleyB.CooperD. J. (1998). Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 257-292.
34.
OswickC.FlemingP.HanlonG. (2011). From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the processes of organizational theory building. Academy of Management Review, 36, 318-337.
35.
PhillipsN.LawrenceT. B.HardyC. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29, 635-652.
36.
PutnamH. (1992). Realism with a human face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
SuddabyR. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 14-20.
Von GlasersfeldE. (1974). Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology. In SmockC. D.Glasersfeld vonE. (Eds.), Epistemology and education (pp. 1–24). Athens, GA: Follow Through Publications.
40.
WhittingtonR. (1992). Putting Giddens into action: Social systems and managerial agency. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 693-712.
41.
WillmottH. (1981). The structuring of organizational structure: A note. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 470-474.
42.
WillmottH. (2015). Why institutional theory cannot be critical. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 105-111.
43.
ŽižekS. (2000). The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London, UK: Verso.
