AbrahamsonE. (2008). 22 things I hate: Mini rants on management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 422-425.
2.
BedeianA. (2003). The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 331-338.
3.
BiggartN. W. (2000, Spring). From the chair. Organizations, Occupations, & Work, pp. 1-2.
4.
ClairJ. A. (2015). Toward a Bill of Rights for manuscript submitters. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14, 111-131.
5.
DriverM. (2007). Reviewer feedback as discourse of the other: A psychoanalytic perspective on the manuscript review process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 351-360.
6.
FaemsD.HannahD. R. (2018). A retrospective examination of a successful developmental reviewing process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27, 144-148.
7.
FarsonR. (1996). Management of the absurd. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
8.
GoesP. B. (2014). The MISQ review system: Operational perspectives. MIS Quarterly, 38, iii-vii.
9.
HornS. A. (2016). The social and psychological costs of peer review: Stress and coping with manuscript rejection. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25, 11-26.
10.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.LounsburyM.MeyerA.RagagopalanN.StarbuckW. (2015, March). Mahalo: Infusing a positive spirit in management research and publication. 56th Annual Meetings of the Western Academy of Management, Kauai, HI.
11.
JehnK. A.NorthcraftG. B.NealM. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
12.
MacdonaldS. (2015). Emperor’s new clothes: The reinvention of peer review as myth. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 264-279.
13.
MaloneT. W.LaubacherR.DellarocasC. (2010). The collective intelligence genome. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51, 20-31.
14.
MeyerA. D.StarbuckW. H. (2018). Mahalo: Sustaining JMI’s positive spirit. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27, 154-157.
15.
MinerJ. B. (2003). Commentary on Arthur Bedeian’s “The management review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors.”Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 339-343.
16.
OliverC. (2010). The goals of scholarship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 26-32.
17.
PatriottaG. (2017). Crafting papers for publication: Novelty and convention in academic writing. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 747-759.
18.
PyrkoI.DörflerV.EdenC. (2017). Thinking together: What makes communities of practice work?Human Relations, 70, 389-409.
19.
RaelinJ. A. (2008). Refereeing the game of peer review. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 124-129.
20.
RaginsB. R. (2015). Developing our authors. Academy of Management Review, 40, 1-8.
21.
RaginsB. R. (2018). From boxing to dancing: Creating a developmental editorial culture. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27, 158-163.
22.
SeidelM.-D. L. (2018). The role of conferences in the emergence of developmental professional culture. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27, 149-153.
23.
SeidelM.-D. L.StewartK. J. (2011). An initial description of the C-form. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 33, 37-72.
24.
ShawJ. D. (2017). From the editors: Moving forward at AMJ. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1-5.
25.
SpectorP. E. (1998, Fall). When reviewers become authors: A comment on the journal review process. Research Methods Forum, pp. 1-4.
26.
StackmanR. W.HannahD. R. (2017). Generative curiosity: Introducing JMI’s newest section. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26, 112-115.
27.
StackmanR. W.HendersonL. S.BlochD. P. (2006). Emergence and community: The story of three complex adaptive entities. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 8, 78-91.
28.
StarbuckW. H. (2003). Turning lemons into lemonade: Where is the value in peer reviews?Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 344-351.
29.
StarbuckW. H. (2016). 60th anniversary essay: How journals could improve research practices in social science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, 165-183.
30.
TosiH. (2009). It’s about time!!!! What to do about long delays in the review process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 175-178.
31.
TsangE. W. K. (2013). Is this referee really my peer? A challenge to the peer-review process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22, 166-171.
32.
TsangE. W. K.FreyB. S. (2007). The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 128-136.
33.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
WengerE.McDermottR.SnyderW. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
35.
WengerE.SnyderW. M. (2000, January-February). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, pp. 139-145.