Studying entrepreneurship in the context of recession and (post)crisis opens up a set of important questions regarding the relationship between entrepreneuring, social relations, and social change. In drawing upon insights from a 2-year ethnographic study of the Spanish’s Plataforma de Afectados por la Hipoteca (Mortgage Victims Platform), known as the PAH, this article centers on the mobilization of rather unlikely citizens to a process in which most of them never thought they would be part of. We suggest that a renewed engagement with such insights regarding the emergence of new forms of organizing, the development of (new?) forms of relationality and being together, and the role of different forms of emotions in hindering/favoring agency, offers important avenues to enrich entrepreneurship research.
AldrichH. E.KenworthyA. L. (1999). The accidental entrepreneur: Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings. In BaumJ. A. C.McKelveyB. (Eds.), Variations in organization science: In honor of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 19-33). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
BeckerH. S. (1986). Doing things together: Selected papers. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
3.
CastellsM. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope. Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity.
4.
CourpassonD.DanyF.MartiI. (2014). Organizational entrepreneurship as active resistance: A struggle against outsourcing. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/etap.12109.
5.
de CerteauM. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
DesmondM. (2012). Disposable ties and the urban poor. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1295-1335.
7.
FineG. A. (2003). Crafting authenticity: The validation of identity in self taught art. Theory and Society, 32, 153-180.
8.
FoucaultM. (1984). Des espaces autres (Conférence au Cercle d’études architecturales, 14 mars 1967). Dits et écrits II, 1976–1988, Quarto. Paris: Gallimard.
9.
GartnerW. B.BirdB. J.StarrJ. (1992). Acting as if: Differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 13-32.
10.
HardtM.NegriA. (2012). Declaration. New York, NY: Argo Navis.
11.
HjorthD. (2005). Organizational entrepreneurship: With de Certeau on creating Heterotopias (or spaces for play). Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 386-398.
12.
HjorthD. (2012). Handbook of organizational entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
13.
JonesC.SpicerA. (2009). Unmasking the entrepreneur. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
14.
KokkinidisG. (2014). Spaces of possibilities: Workers self-management in Greece. Organization. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1350508414521098.
15.
LópezI.RodríguezE. (2011). The Spanish model. New Left Review, 69, 1-15.
16.
MairJ.MartíI.VentrescaM. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 819-850.
17.
MartiI.CourpassonD.BarbosaS. (2013). “Living in the Fishbowl”: Generating an entrepreneurial culture in a local community in Argentina. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 10-29.
18.
PollettaF. (1999). Free spaces in collective action. Theory and Society, 28, 1-38.
19.
RanisP. (2010). Worker-run U.S. factories and enterprises: The example of Argentine cooperatives. In KawanoE.MastersonT.Teller-ElsbergJ. (Eds.), Solidarity economy: Building alternatives for people and planet (pp. 115-123). Amherst, MA: Center for Popular Economics.
20.
RindovaV.BarryD.KetchenD. J.Jr. (2009). Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Academy of Management Review, 34, 477-491.
21.
SassenS. (2014). Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
ScottJ. C. (2012). Two cheers for anarchism: Six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
SpinozaC.FloresR.DreyfusH. L. (1997). Disclosing new worlds: Entrepreneurship, democratic action, and the cultivation of solidarity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
24.
StandingG. (2011). The Precariat: The new dangerous class. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
25.
SteyaertC. (2011). Entrepreneurship as in(ter)vention: Reconsidering the conceptual politics of method in entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23, 77-88.
26.
SteyaertC.KatzJ. (2004). Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: Geographical, discursive and social dimensions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16, 179-196.
