This article reflects on the different ways in which the concept of power is treated in elite U.S. journals compared with European journals. Some observers have argued that critical researchers should not bother to try and publish their work in elite U.S. journals because of the compromises that have to be made in doing so. This essay argues that a “limited engagement” with these journals constitutes one way of trying to resist the power/knowledge relations that are so deeply embedded in them.
AlvessonM. (2013). Do we have something to say? Fromre-search to roi-search and back again. Organization, 20,79-90.
2.
BarleyS. R. (2007). Corporations, democracy, and the public good. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 201-215.
3.
BattilanaJ.AntebyN.SengulM. (2010). The circulation of ideas across academic communities: When locals re-import exported ideas. Organization Studies, 31, 695-713.
4.
BojeD. (1995). Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as “Tamara-land.”Academy of Management Journal, 38, 997-1035.
5.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London, England: Heinemann.
6.
CalásM. B.SmircichL. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. Academy of Management Review, 24, 649-671.
7.
CooperD. J.EzzamelM.WillmottH. (2008). Examining institutionalization: A critical theoretic perspective. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.SahlinK. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 673-701). London, England: Sage.
8.
CovaleskiM. A.DirsmithM. W.HeianJ. B.SamuelS. (1998). The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 293-327.
9.
FaircloughN. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
10.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. GordonC. (Ed.). Brighton: Harvester Press.
11.
GabrielY. (2010). Organization studies: A space for ideas, identities and agonies. Organization Studies, 31, 757-775.
KnightsD. (1992). Changing spaces: The disruptive impact of a new epistemological location for the study of management. Academy of Management Review, 17, 514-536.
14.
LeblebiciH.SalancikG. R.CopayA.KingT. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 333-363.
15.
LukesS. (1974). Power: A radical view. London, England:Macmillan.
16.
MechanicD. (1962). Sources of power of lower participants in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 349-364.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (1974). Organizational decision making as a political process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 135-151.
19.
RynesS. L.BartunekJ. M.DaftR. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340-355.
20.
TownleyB. (1993). Foucault, power/Knowledge and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18, 518-545.
21.
WillmottH. (2011). Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS list. Organization, 18, 429-442.
