This article addresses a long-established yet still contentious question in international management scholarship—Is it possible and desirable to create a universal theory of management and organization? Scholarship about the boundary conditions of endogenous theory and the need for indigenous theories of management as well as geopolitical changes in the world order have animated this debate. Five leading scholars discussed this topic at a symposium held at the 2009 Academy of Management meeting. This article presents an analysis of their viewpoints. Three key perspectives were identified in the debate: the refining perspective, the reinforcing perspective, and the reimagining perspective. Using excerpts from the symposium transcript, we outline, compare, and critically evaluate the characteristics and significance of each perspective to advancing theory development. The distinctive contribution of this article lies in its meta-theoretical debate about the relationship between theory, context, and power in the production of global management knowledge.
AppaduraiA. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7, 295-310.
2.
BarneyJ.ZhangS. (2009). The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5, 15-28.
3.
BerryJ. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 735-742.
4.
BoyacigillerN. A.AdlerN. (1991). The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16, 262-290.
5.
BrannenM. Y. (2003). What is culture and why does it matter? Current conceptualizations of culture from anthropology. In BoyacigillerN.GoodmanR.PhillipsM. (Eds.), Crossing-cultures: A product of a master teacher workshop (pp. 20-38). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
BrannenM. Y. (2004). When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit and the semiotics of foreignness. Academy of Management Review, 29, 593-616.
7.
BuckleyP. J.ChapmanM. (1997). The use of native categories in management research. British Journal of Management, 8, 283-300.
8.
ChengJ. (1994). On the concept of universal knowledge in organizational science: Implications for cross national research. Management Science, 40, 162-168.
9.
ConnellR. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
10.
DavidsonD. (1973). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47, 5-20.
11.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.SmithL. T. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
EarleyC.SinghH. (1995). International and intercultural management research: What’s next?Academy of Management Journal, 38, 327-340.
13.
GhauriP.FangT. (2001). Negotiating with the Chinese: A socio-cultural analysis. Journal of World Business, 36, 303-325.
14.
GiddensA. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making sense of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
HarbisonF.MyersC. A. (1959). Management in the industrial world: An international analysis. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
16.
HardingS. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
17.
HasegawaH. (2006). Developing management studies as a social science: Globalization and Japanese management studies. Asian Business & Management, 5, 67-85.
18.
HassardJ. (1988). Overcoming hermeticism in organization theory: An alternative to paradigm incommensurability. Human Relations, 41, 47-59.
19.
HelfrichH. (1999). Beyond the dilemma of cross-cultural psychology: Resolving the tension between etic and emic approaches. Culture & Psychology, 5, 131-153.
20.
HenryE.PeneH. (2001). Kaupapa Maori: Locating indigenous ontology, epistemology and methodology in the academy. Organization, 8, 234-242.
21.
HeronJ.ReasonP. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 274-294.
22.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
HofstedeG. (1984). The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review, 9, 389-398.
24.
HofstedeG.BondM. H. (1988). Confucius and economic growth: New trends in culture’s consequences. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 4-21.
25.
JackG.CalásM. B.NkomoS. M.PeltonenT. (2008). Critique and international management: An uneasy relationship?Academy of Management Review, 33, 870-884.
26.
JackG.WestwoodR. (2009). International and cross-cultural management studies: A postcolonial reading. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
JacksonN.CarterP. (1991). In defence of paradigm incomparability. Organization Studies, 12, 109-127.
28.
KaufmanB. E. (2005). Clark Kerr and the founding of the Berkeley IIR: A celebratory remembrance. Industrial Relations, 44, 405-415.
29.
KerrC.DunlopJ. T.HarbisonF. H.MyersC. A. (1960). Industrialism and industrial man: The problem of labor and management in economic growth (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
30.
LeungK.LiP.ChenC.LuoJ. (2009). Call for papers: Management and organization review: Special issue on indigenous management research in China. Management and Organization Review, 5, 431-432.
31.
LiP. P. (2012). Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 849-872.
32.
MarchJ. (2004). Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management and Organization Review, 1, 5-22.
33.
MertonR. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: The Free Press.
34.
MeyerK. (2006). Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asian Pacific Journal of Management, 23, 119-137.
35.
PengM. (2005). Perspectives—From China strategy to global strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22, 123-141.
36.
PetersonM. F.PikeK. L. (2002). Emics and etics for organizational studies: A lesson in contrast from linguistics. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 2, 5-19.
37.
PikeK. (1971). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour (2nd ed.). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
38.
PrichardC.SayersJ.BathurstR. (2007). Franchise, margin and locale: Constructing a critical management studies locale in Aotearoa New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology, 22, 22-44.
39.
RabinowP. (1986). Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. In CliffordJ.MarcusG. E. (Eds.), Writing culture: the poetics and politics of anthropology (pp. 234-261). Berkeley: University of California Press.
ShapiroD.Von GlinowM.XiaoZ. (2006). Toward polycontextually sensitive research methods. Management and Organization Review, 3, 129-152.
42.
SinghK.AngS. H.LeongS. M. (2003). Increasing replication for knowledge accumulation in strategy research. Journal of Management, 29, 533-549.
43.
SinkovicsR. R.PenzE.GhauriP. N. (2008). Enhancing the trustworthiness of qualitative research in international business. Management International Review, 48, 689-714.
44.
TsangE. W. K.KwanK.-M. (1999). Replication and theory development in organization science: A critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 759-780.
45.
TsuiA. (2004). Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 491-513.
46.
TsuiA. (2006). Editorial: Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2, 1-13.
47.
TsuiA. (2007). From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1353-1364.
48.
WhettenD. (2009). An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5, 29-55.
49.
WilkR. (1995). Learning to be local in Belize: Global systems of common difference. In MillerD. (Ed.), World apart: Modernity through the prism of the local (pp. 110-133). London, England: Routledge.
50.
ZhuY. (2005). Written communication across cultures: A sociocognitive perspective on business genres. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
51.
ZhuY. (2009a). Managing business relationships in New Zealand and China: A semantic perspective. Management International Review, 49, 225-248.
52.
ZhuY. (2009b). Philosophical underpinnings for equilibrium of values and implications for management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 290-296.
