Can ambiguous vision statements help to initiate strategic change? We draw on organizational and political concepts to make the case that ambiguity in the expression of future aspirations enables a sense of alignment between local and larger organizational goals that eases the political path to successful change. We also explore the paradox that, occasionally, the path out of ambiguity involves the initial injection of even more ambiguity into an already ambiguous situation. In addition, we demonstrate that consideration of a practical problem (how to effectively initiate strategic change) and a nonobvious recommendation (to employ an intentionally ambiguous vision) leads to a deeper exploration of key processes involved in the revision of personal and organizational knowledge.
AlbertS.WhettenD. (1985). Organizational identity. In CummingsL. L.StawB. S. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 263-295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
AndersonP.TushmanM. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 604-633.
3.
AndrewsK. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
4.
AnsoffH. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
AragonesE.NeemanZ. (2000). Strategic ambiguity in electoral competition. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12, 183-204.
6.
ArgoteL.IngramP. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 150-169.
7.
BartunekJ. M. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 355-372.
8.
BattilanaJ.LecaB.BoxenbaumE. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65-107.
9.
BeerM. (1992). Strategic-change research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1, 111-116.
10.
BennisW. (2003). On becoming a leader (3rd ed.). New York: Perseus.
11.
BrownJ. S.DuguidP. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12, 198-213.
12.
BoekerW. (1997). Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 152-170.
13.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CampbellJ. E. (1983). Ambiguity in the issue positions of Presidential candidates: A causal analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 27, 284-293.
15.
ChockP. P. (1995). Ambiguity in policy discourse: Congressional talk about immigration. Policy Sciences, 28, 165-184.
16.
ChristensenC. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
17.
ClarkS. M.GioiaD. A.KetchenD.ThomasJ. B. (2010). Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 397-438.
18.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
19.
CollinsJ. C.PorrasJ. I. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
20.
CookS. D. N.BrownJ. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10, 381-400.
21.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 173-208.
22.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review, 36, 12-32.
23.
CrossanM. M.LaneH. W.WhiteR. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24, 522-537.
24.
DeweyJ. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York, NY: H. Holt and Company.
25.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
26.
DruckerP. F. (1954). The practice of management. New York, NY: Harper.
27.
DurkheimE. (1915). The elementary forms of the religious life: A study in religious sociology. London, UK: G. Allen & Unwin.
28.
DurkheimE. (1973). The dualism of human nature and its social conditions. In BellahR. N. (Ed.), On morality and society (pp. 149-163). Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.
29.
EdelmanM. (1977). Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York, NY: Academic Press.
30.
EisenbergE. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242.
31.
EisenbergE. M.GoodallH. J. (1997). Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St.Martin’s.
32.
FissP.ZajacE. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1173-1193.
33.
GarudR. (1997). On the distinction between know-how, know-why and know-what in technological systems. In WalshJ. P.HuffA. S. (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (pp. 88-101). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
34.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: introduction of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
GioiaD. A. (1998). From individual to organizational identity. In WhettenD. A.GodfreyP. C. (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Developing theory through conversations (pp. 17-31). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
GioiaD. A.ChittipeddiK. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433-448.
37.
GioiaD. A.ThomasJ. B. (1996). Identity, image and issue interpretation: Sensemaking in academic administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370-403.
38.
GlazerA. (1990). The strategy of candidate ambiguity. American Political Science Review, 84, 237-241.
39.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
GreenwoodR.HiningsC. R. (1993). Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1052-1081.
41.
GreinerL. E.BhambriA. (1989). New CEO intervention and dynamics of deliberate strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 67-86.
42.
HarriganK. R. (1985). Strategic flexibility. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
43.
HuckfeldtR.BeckP. A.DaltonR. J.LevineJ.MorganW. (1998). Ambiguity, distorted messages, and nested environmental effects on political communication. The Journal of Politics, 60, 996-1030.
44.
JamesW. (1949). Pragmatism, a new name for some old ways of thinking; together with four related essays selected from The Meaning of Truth. New York, NY: Longmans. (Original work published in 1907)
45.
JansenK. J. (2004). From persistence to pursuit: A longitudinal examination of momentum during the early stages of strategic change. Organization Science, 15, 276-294.
46.
KanterR. M.SteinB. A.JickT. D. (2003). The challenge of organizational change: How companies experience it and leaders guide it. New York, NY: Free Press.
47.
KotterJ. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
48.
KouzesJ. M.PosnerB. Z. (2002). The leadership challenge (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49.
LabiancaG.GrayB.BrassD.J. (2000). A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment. Organization Science, 11, 235-257.
LazarusR. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
52.
LevineD. N. (1985). The flight from ambiguity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53.
LevittB.MarchJ. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
54.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
55.
LockeE.ShawK. N.SaariL. M.LathamG. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
MarchJ.SproullL. S.TamuzM. (1991). Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organization Science, 2, 1-13.
58.
MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (Eds.). (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
59.
MatlandR. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5, 145-174.
60.
MeyersonD. E. (1990). Uncovering socially undesirable emotions: Experiences of ambiguity in organizations. The American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 296-307.
61.
MeyersonD. E. (1991). “Normal” ambiguity? A glimpse of an occupational culture. In FrostP.MooreL.LouisM. R.LundbergC.MartinJ. (Eds.), Reframing organizational culture (pp. 131-144). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62.
NagR.CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2007). The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 821-847.
63.
NonakaI. (1988). Creating organizational order out of chaos: Self-renewal in Japanese firms. California Management Review, 30, 57-73.
64.
NonakaI.TakeuchiH. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65.
O’NeillT.HymelG. (1994). All politics is local, and other rules of the game (1st ed.). New York, NY: Times Books.
66.
PadgettJ. F.AnsellC. K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1259-1319.
67.
PageB. I. (1976). The theory of political ambiguity. American Political Science Review, 70, 742-752.
68.
PageB. I. (1978). Choices and echoes in presidential elections. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
69.
PeirceC. S. (1997). Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking: The 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism. Albany: State University of New York Press. (Original work published in 1903)
70.
PentlandB. T. (1992). Organizing moves in software support hot lines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 527-548.
71.
PfefferJ.MooreW. L. (1980). Power in university budgeting: A replication and extension. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 637-653.
72.
PutnamL. L.SorensonR. L. (1982). Equivocal messages in organizations. Human Communication Research, 8, 114-132.
73.
RajagopalanN.SpreitzerG. M. (1997). Toward a theory of strategic change: A multi-lens perspective and integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 22, 48-79.
74.
RegerR. K.BarneyJ.BundersonS.ForemanP.GustafsonL. T.HuffA. S.StimpertL. (1998). A strategy conversation on the topic of organizational identity. In WhettenD. A.GodfreyP. (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Developing theory through conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75.
SackmannS. A. (1992). Culture and subcultures: An analysis of organizational knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 140-161.
76.
SchatzkiT. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
77.
ShepsleK. A. (1972). The strategy of ambiguity: Uncertainty and electoral competition. American Political Science Review, 66, 555-568.
78.
SonensheinS. (2010). We’re changing—Or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 477-512.
79.
SongJ.AlmeidaP.WuG. (2003). Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer?Management Science, 49, 351.
80.
SwidlerA. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273-286.
81.
TichyN. M. (1983). Managing strategic change: Technical, political, and cultural dynamics. New York, NY: John Wiley.
82.
ThomasK. W.TymonW. G.Jr. (1982). Necessary properties of relevant research: Lessons from recent criticisms of the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 7, 345-352.
83.
TownleyB. (2002). The role of competing rationalities in institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 163-179.
84.
Van de VenA. H.PooleM. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20, 510-540.
85.
WeickK. E. (1977). Enactment processes in organizations. In StawB. M.SalancikG. (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior. Chicago, IL: St. Clair Press.
86.
WeickK. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
87.
WeickK. E.QuinnR. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. In SpenceJ. T.DarleyJ. M.FossD. J. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 50, pp. 361-386). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
88.
ZahraS. A.NielsenA. P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 377-398.
