The growing popularity of institutional work suggests a broad agentic turn in institutional approaches to organizational studies. We briefly describe the contribution of the evolving institutional-work research agenda. Then, we identify two problematic areas in this line of research: the privileged causal status of “actors” and the under-theorized nature of institutions. We suggest that re-engagement with insights of the earlier, foundational work in neo-institutional theory would benefit this emerging research agenda.
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. ( 2009). How actors change institutions: Toward a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65-107.
2.
Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies , 21(4), 721-746.
3.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1986). Social theory, social research, and a theory of action . American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1039-1335.
4.
Colyvas, J.A. ( 2007). Divergent meanings and common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University. Research Policy, 26, 456-476.
5.
Davis, G.F., & Marquis, C. ( 2005). Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organization Science, 16(4), 332-343.
6.
DiMaggio, P.J. ( 1988). Interest and agency in insitutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
7.
DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. ( 1983). Iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
8.
Dobbin, F. ( 1994a). Cultural models of organization: The social construction of rational organizing principles. In D. Crane (Ed.), The sociology of culture: Emerging theoretical perspectives (pp. 117-141). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
9.
Dobbin, F. ( 1994b). Forging industrial policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the railway age. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Dobbin, F. ( 2009). Inventing equal employment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Dobbin, F., Sutton, J.R., Scott, W.R., & Meyer, J.W. ( 1993). Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 396-427.
12.
Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (Eds.). (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
Drori, G.S., Meyer, J.W., & Hwang, H. (2009). Global rationalization and "organization" as scripted actorhood. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 27, 1-27.
14.
Edelman, L.B. ( 1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in theAmerican workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1401-1440.
15.
Edelman, L.B., Uggen, C., & Erlanger, H.S. (1999). The endogeneity of legal regulation: Grievance procedures as rational myth. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 406-454.
16.
Fligstein, N. ( 2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19, 105-125.
17.
Garfinkel, H. ( 1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C. , Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
19.
Hwang, H., & Powell, W.W. ( 2005). Institutions and entrepreneurship. In S. Alvarez, R. Agrawal, & O. Sorenson (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 201-232). New York, NY: Springer.
20.
Hwang, H., & Powell, W.W. ( 2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly , 54, 268-298.
21.
Jepperson, R.L. ( 1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism . In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143-163). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Jepperson, R.L. ( 2002a). The development and application of sociological neoinstitutionalism . In J. Berger & M. J. Zelditch (Eds.), New directions in contemporary sociological theory (pp. 229-266). Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
23.
Jepperson, R.L. ( 2002b). Political modernities: Disentangling two underlying dimensions of institutional differentiation. Sociological Theory, 20, 61-85.
24.
Jepperson, R.L., & Meyer, J.W. ( 1991). The public order and the construction of formal organizations . In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 204-231). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Jepperson, R.L., & Meyer, J.W. ( 2007). Analytical individualism and the explanation of macro social change. In V. Nee & R. Swedberg (Eds.), On capitalism (pp. 273-304). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
Kruecken, G., & Meier, F. ( 2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 241-257). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
Lawrence, T.B., & Suddaby. R. ( 2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy , T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215-254). London, UK : SAGE.
28.
Lawrence, T.B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. ( 2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Lawrence, T.B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. ( 2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52-58.
30.
Meyer, J.W. ( 1992). Conclusion: Institutionalization and the rationality of formal organizational structure. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (Updated ed., pp. 261-282). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
31.
Meyer, J.W. ( 1994). Rationalized environments. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (Eds.), Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism (pp. 28-54). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
Meyer, J.W. ( 2010). World society, institutional theories, and the actor . Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1-20.
33.
Meyer, J.W., Boli, J., & Thomas, G.M. ( 1994). Ontology and rationalization in the Western cultural account. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (Eds.), Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism (pp. 12-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
Meyer, J.W., & Jepperson, R.L. (2000). The "actors" of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18, 100-120.
35.
Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. ( 1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
36.
Powell, W.W. ( 1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183-203). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Powell, W.W., & Colyvas, J.A. ( 2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276-298). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
38.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Strang, D., & Sine, W. ( 2002). Interorganizational institutions. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 497-519). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
40.
Sutton, J.R., & Dobbin, F. ( 1996). The two faces of governance: Responses to legal uncertainty in U.S. Firms, 1955 to 1985. American Sociological Review , 61, 794-811.
