This article examines how philosophical assumptions of practice can thwart the conception, adoption, and implementation of critical actions such as creativity. Delineating positivism and interpretivism, it is argued that the former treats the world as an objective system that can be studied through scientific methods, whereas the latter conceptualizes the world as an ambiguous social construction that cannot be readily apprehended via standard empirical inquiry. This distinction is not drawn to aim another invective against positivist science but to connect it to scientific realism and scientific instrumentalism, revealing iterative mutuality. With the cultural value afforded positivism and the formal training delivered in professional schools, practitioners largely adhere to positivist assumptions. Therefore, after identifying and briefly reviewing the creativity literature as it relates to organizational change and innovation, three contrasts are drawn to illustrate how underlying assumptions prevent practices necessary for effective introduction of creative ideas and actions.
Amabile, T.M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 43, 997-1013.
2.
Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3.
Amabile, T.M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations . Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
4.
Andrews, N. (1998). Seeing, semantics and social epistemic practice . Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29(4), 501-514.
5.
Argote, L. (2005). Reflections on two views of managing learning and knowledge in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry , 14(1), 43-48.
6.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D.A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. New York: Addison-Wesley .
7.
Armentakis, A.A., & Harris, S.G. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 169-183.
8.
Bailey, J.R., & Eastman, W.N. (1994). Positivism and the promise of the social sciences . Theory & Psychology, 4, 505-524.
9.
Bailey, J. R., & Eastman, W. N. (Eds.). (1996). Science and service in organizational scholarship. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 350-464.
10.
Bailey, J.R., & Ford, C.M. (1996). Management as science versus management as practice in post-graduate business education. Business Strategy Review , 7, 7-12.
11.
Bartunek, J.M. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 355-372.
12.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis . London: Heinemann Educational Books.
13.
Cacioppo, J.T., Semin, G.R., & Berntson, G.G. (2004). Realism, instrumentalism, and scientific symbiosis: Psychological theory as a search for truth and the discovery of solutions. American Psychologist, 59(4), 214-223.
14.
Chia, R. (1997). Essai: Thirty years on: From organizational structures to the organization of thought. Organization Studies, 18(4), 685-708.
15.
Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
16.
Clegg, S. (1998). Foucault, power and organizations. In A. McKinlay & K. Starkey (Eds.), Foucault, management and organization theory (pp. 29-48). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
18.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
19.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325-339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Daft, R.L., & Wiginton, J.C. (1979). Language and organization . Academy of Management Review, 4, 179-191.
21.
Derrida, J. (1984). Jacques Derrida. In R. Kearney (Ed.), Dialogues with contemporary continental thinkers. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
22.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1984). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational field. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
23.
Dooley, K.J. (1997). A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences , 1(1), 69-97.
24.
Drazen, R., Glynn, M.A., & Kazanjian, R.K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286-307.
25.
Eastman, W.E., & Bailey, J.B. (1994). Examining the origins of management theory: Value divisions in the positivist program. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30, 313-328.
26.
Eastman, W.N., & Bailey, J.R. (1998). Reconciling the fact-value antinomy: Patterns in legal and managerial rhetoric, 1880-1980. Organization Science, 9, 232-245.
27.
Elrod, P.D., & Tippett, D.D. (2002). The "Death Valley" of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(3), 273-291.
Ford, C.M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112-1142.
30.
Ford, C.M., & Gioia, D.A. (1995). Creativity in organizations: Ivory tower visions and real world voices. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Ford, C.M., & Gioia, D.A. (2000). Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. Journal of Management, 26(4), 702-732.
32.
Ford, N. (2004). Creativity and convergence in information science research: The roles of objectivity and subjectivity, constraint, and control . Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(13), 1169-1183.
33.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
34.
Foucault, M. (1985). The history of sexuality, Vol. II. New York: Vintage Books.
35.
Georgsdottir, A.S., & Getz, I. (2004). How flexibility facilitates innovation and ways to manage it in organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management , 13(3), 166-175.
36.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
Glynn, M.A., Barr, P.S., & Dacin, M.T. (2000). Pluralism and the problem of variety. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 726-734.
38.
Gravenhorst, K.M., Werkman, R.A., & Boonstra, J.J. (2003). The change capacity of organisations: General assessment and five configurations. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52(1), 83-105.
39.
Grey, C. (2004). Reinventing business schools: The contribution of critical management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(2), 178-186.
40.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Habermas, J. (1984a). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society, Vol. 1. London, UK: Heinemann.
42.
Habermas, J. (1984b). The philosophical discourse of modernity, Cambridge, UK: Polity.
43.
Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-259.
44.
Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149-164.
45.
Hardcastle, G., & Richardson, A. (1993). Logical empiricism in North America. MinnesotaUniversity of Minnesota Press .
46.
Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R.I. (2000, May-June). Building an innovation factory. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 157-166.
47.
Hatch, M.J. (2005). The revenge of Gagliardi on utilitarianism. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 316-318.
48.
Howard, P.K. (1994). The death of common sense. New York: Random House.
49.
Keedy, J.L. (2005). Reconciling the theory and practice schism in educational administration through practitioner-developed theories in practice . Journal of Educational Administration, 43(2), 134-154.
50.
Kilduff, M. (1993). Deconstructing organizations. Academy of Management Review, 18, 13-31.
51.
Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (1989). Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation. Sociology, 23(4), 475-483.
52.
Lee, A.S. (1999). Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 29-34.
Luthans, F., & Davis, T. (1982). An idiographic approach to organizational behavior research: The use of single case experimental designs and direct measures . Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 380-391.
55.
March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
56.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1983). Structure of educational organizations. In J. Meyer & R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments (pp. 71-96). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57.
Mintzberg, H. (2005). The magic number seven-plus or minus a couple of managers. Academy of Management Learning & Education , 4(2), 244-247.
58.
Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 5, 491-500.
59.
O'Leary, Z. (2004). Research as a creative and strategic thinking process. In Z. O'Leary (Ed.), The essential guide to doing research (pp. 1-14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
Petty, J.T., Semin, G.R., & Berntson, G.G. (2004). Realism, instrumentalism, and scientific symbiosis: Psychological theory as a search for truth and the discovery of solutions. American Psychologist, 59(4), 214-223.
61.
Pfeffer, J. (2001). Fighting the war for talent is hazardous to your organization's health. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 248-259.
62.
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C.T. (2004). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education , 1(1), 78-95.
63.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R.I. (1999, May-June). The smart-talk trap. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 135-142.
64.
Rabinow, P., & Sullivan, W.M. (1979). The interpretive turn: Emergence on an approach. In P. Rabinow & W. M. Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive social science: A reader (pp. 1-21). Berkeley: University of California Press.
65.
Raelin, J.A. (2005). "I don't have time to think!" versus the art of reflective practice. Reflections, The SoL Journal, 4(1), 66-79.
66.
Raelin, J.A., & Raelin, J.D. (2006). Developmental action learning: Toward collaborative change. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 3(1), 45-67.
67.
Rand, A. (2005). The fountainhead: Centennial edition. New York: Plume.
68.
Rynes, S.L. (2007). Carrying Sumantra Ghoshal's torch: Creating more positive, relevant, and ecologically valid research. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 745-747.
69.
Schein, (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologists, 42, 109-119.
70.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
71.
Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). Theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73.
Scott, S.G., & Bruce, R.A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
74.
Simonton, D.K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford.
75.
Simonton, D.K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, development, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151-158.
76.
Wampold, B.E. (2003). Bashing positivism and revering a medical model under the guise of evidence. Counseling Psychologist, 31(5), 539-618.
77.
Weber, R. (2004). The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 111-121.
78.
Weick, K. (1979). Cognitive processes in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 41-74). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
79.
Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., & Griffin, R.W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.
