The new Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International (AACSB) accreditation guidelines specify standards regarding the development of goals and learning objectives for various content areas and “soft” skills such as writing and oral presentation. These standards are being interpreted in a variety of ways across accredited schools of business. The authors argue that these standards are likely to be interpreted and actioned in ways that do not support best practices in education. To frame the discussion, they compare the more traditional model of liberal arts education to the predominant model evolving in schools of business today. They also include a discussion of how “differences” such as learning styles and epistemology become subordinated in the accreditation process. The authors end the article by sharing a “live” example of how some of the AACSB standards have been operationalized and the implications therein.
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Washington, DC.
2.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International. (2006). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. St. Louis, MO.
3.
Bennis, W.G., & O'Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96-104.
4.
Bolman, L.G., & Deal, T.E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
5.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London: Heinemann.
6.
Butler, K.A. (1986). Learning and teaching style in theory and practice . Columbia, CT: Learner's Dimension .
7.
Ciardi, J.1997. "Credibility." The Collected Poems of John Ciardi. Compiled by Edward M. Cifelli. Fayetteville, AK: University of Arkansas Press: 291. Originally published 1962, in In Fact. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
9.
Dewey, J. (1959a). My pedagogic creed. In M. S. Dworkin (Ed.), Dewey on education: Selections (Vol. 3, pp. 19-32). New York: Teachers College at Columbia University. (Original work published 1897)
10.
Dewey, J. (1959b). Progressive education and the science of education . In M. S. Dworkin (Ed.), Dewey on education: Selections (Vol. 3, pp. 113-126). New York: Teachers College at Columbia University. (Original work published 1928)
11.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
12.
Facione, P.A. (1990). Executive summary, critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction . Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.
13.
Felder, R.M., & Silverman, L.K. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78, 674-681.
14.
Felder, R.M., & Solomon, B. (n.d.). Index of Learning Styles self-scoring instrument. Available from North Carolina State University Web site, http://www.4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/RMF.html
15.
Gregorc, A.F. (1982). An adult's guide to style. Maynard, MA: Gabriel Systems.
16.
Hermann, M. (2004). Linking liberal and professional education in nursing. Liberal Education. Retrieved April 2, http://www.aacu.org/liberaleducation/le-fa04/le-fa04perspective.cfm
17.
Julian, S.D., & Ofori-Dankwa, J.C. (2006). Is accreditation good for the strategic decision making of traditional business schools? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(2), 225-233.
18.
Kilpatrick, J., Kranhke, K., & Evans, R. (2004). The self-organizing requisite: what complexity dynamics and emerging trends require of business education. Paper presented at the Institute for Behavioral and Applied Management , Providence, RI.
19.
Kolb, A.Y., & Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.
20.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Lasch, C. (1990). The lost art of political argument. Harper's Magazine, 280, 17-22.
22.
Livingston, J.S. (1971). Myth of the well-educated manager. Harvard Business Review, 49(1), 79-89.
23.
Lund Dean, K. (2004). Systems thinking's challenge to research in spirituality & religion at work: An interview with Ian Mitroff. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(1), 11-25.
24.
McClintock, C. (2001). Spanning boundaries of knowledge and organization: Collaborations for mind and management in higher education. Organization, 8(2), 349-357.
25.
Meredith, G."Modern Love: L." Modern Love, and Poems of the English Roadside, with poems and ballads. London: Chapman and Hall, 1862. Reprinted in Helen Gardner, ed. 1972. The New Oxford Book of English Verse. New York: Oxford University Press: 723.
26.
Mintzberg, H., & Westley, F. (2001, Spring). Decision making: It's not what you think . MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(3), 89-93.
27.
Mitroff, I.I., & Mason, R.O. (1982). Business policy and metaphysics: Some philosophical considerations. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 361-371.
28.
Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 491-500.
29.
Munro, R.A., & Rice-Munro, E.J. (2004). Learning styles, teaching approaches, and technology. Journal for Quality & Participation , 27(1), 26-32.
30.
Pearce, J.L. (2004). What do we know and how do we really know it? Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 175-179.
31.
Schwandt, D.R. (2005). When managers become philosophers: Integrating learning with sensemaking. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 176-192.
32.
Zull, J.E. (2002). The art of changing the brain. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
