Is truth a research goal and regulative ideal that is appropriate for management research? Is realism an appropriate philosophical foundation for management research? This article answers in the affirmative on both of these questions by (a) using historical method to develop the four fundamental tenets of scientific realism, (b) using the historical material to show how some management writers have presented a historically false view of scientific realism, (c) developing a scientific realist model of truth, and (d) using trust as a foundation, arguing for truth and realism in management research.
Alston, W. P. (1996). A realist conception of truth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
Anderson, P. F. (1988, December). Relativism residivus: In defense of critical relativism. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 403-406.
3.
Angeles, P. A. (1981). Dictionary of philosophy. New York: Barnes and Noble Books.
4.
Ayer, A. J. (1959). Logical positivism. New York: Free Press.
5.
Azevedo, J. (2002). Updating organizational epistemology. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 715-732). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
6.
Barney, J. B. (1990). The debate between traditional management theory and organizational economics. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 382-394.
7.
Baum, J. A. C., & Rowley, T. J. (2002). Companion to organizations: An introduction. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 1-34). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
8.
Bergmann, G. (1967). Metaphysics of logical positivism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
9.
Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Brighton, UK: Harvester.
10.
Boyd, R. N. (1984). The current status of scientific realism. In J. Leplin (Ed.), Scientific realism (pp. 41-82), Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Bunge, M. (1967). Scientific research, Vol. 2: The search for truth. New York: Springer-Verlag.
12.
David, R. J., & Han, S. (2004). A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 39-58.
13.
Donaldson, L. (1990). A rational basis for criticisms of industrial organization economics. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 394-401.
14.
Durant, W. (1954). The story of philosophy. New York: Free Press.
15.
Fine, A. (1986). The shaky game. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Gioia, D. A. (2003). Give it up! Reflection on the interpreted world. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 285-292.
17.
Godfrey, P. C., & Hill, C. W. L. (1995, October). The problem of unobservables in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 519-533.
18.
Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Harré, R. (1986). Varieties of realism. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
20.
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.
21.
Hooker, C. A. (1985). Surface dazzle, ghostly depths: An exposition and critical evaluation of Van Fraassen’s vindication of empiricism against realism. In P. M. Churchland & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Images of science (pp. 153-196). Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
22.
Hosmer, L. R. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 379-403.
23.
Hunt, S. D. (1990). Truth in marketing theory and research. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1-15.
24.
Hunt, S. D. (1993, October). Objectivity in marketing theory and research. Journal of Marketing, 57, 76-91.
25.
Hunt, S. D. (1994). On the rhetoric of qualitative methods: Toward historically informed argumentation in management inquiry. Journal of Management Inquiry, 3, 221-234.
26.
Hunt, S. D. (2002). Truth and scientific realism (Working paper). Lubbock: Texas Tech University, Marketing Department.
27.
Hunt, S. D. (2003). Controversy in marketing theory: For reason, realism, truth, and objectivity. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
28.
Joergensen, J. (1970). The development of logical empiricism. In R. Carnap & C. Morris (Eds.), Foundations of the unity of science (2nd ed., pp. 845-946). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Leplin, J. (1984). Scientific realism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
Levin, M. E. (1984). What kind of explanation is truth. In J. Leplin (Ed.), Scientific realism (pp. 124-139). Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
Levin, M. E. (1991, Spring). The reification-realism controversy in macromarketing: A philosopher’s view. Journal of Macromarketing, 11, 57-65.
32.
Lounsbury, M. (2003). The death of organization science. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 293-298.
33.
MacKinnon, E. (1979). Scientific realism: The new debates. Philosophy of Science, 46, 501-532.
34.
Manicas, P. T. (1987). A history of philosophy of the social sciences. New York: Blackwell.
35.
Maxwell, G. (1962). The ontological status of theoretical entities. In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Scientific explanation, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 3, pp. 3-27). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
36.
McKelvey, B. (1999). Toward a Campbellian realist organization science. In J. A. C. Baum & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in organization science: In honor of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 383-411). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
McKelvey, B. (2002). Model-centered organization science epistemology. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 752-780). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
38.
McMullin, E. (1984). Acase for scientific realism. In J. Leplin (Ed.), Scientific realism (pp. 8-40). Berkeley: University of California Press.
39.
Meckler, M., & Baillie, J. (2003a). The truth about social construction in administrative science. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 273-284.
40.
Meckler, M., & Baillie, J. (2003b). You can’t handle the truth: A response to Gioia and Lounsbury. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 299-303.
41.
Moldoveanu, M. C., & Baum, J. A. C. (2002). Contemporary debates in organizational epistemology. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 733-751). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
42.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994, January). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 57, 20-38.
43.
Niiniluoto, I. (1999). Critical scientific realism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
Pearce, J. L. (2001). How we can learn how governments matter to management and organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10(2), 103-112.
45.
Polkinghorne, J. C. (1984). The quantum world. New York: Longman.
46.
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
Putnam, H. (1962). What theories are not. In E. Nagel, P. Suppes, & A. Tarski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1962 International Congress (pp. 240-251). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48.
Putnam, H. (1990). Realism with a human face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
50.
Schlick, M. (1959). Positivism and realism. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism (pp. 82-107). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932)
51.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
52.
Sellars, W. (1963). Science, perception and reality. New York: Humanities Press.
53.
Siegel, H. (1983). Brown on epistemology and the new philosophy of science. Synthese, 56(1), 61-89.
54.
Siegel, H. (1987). Relativism refuted. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
55.
Stove, D. (1982). Popper and after. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
56.
Suppe, F. (1977). The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
57.
Tarski, A. (1956). Logic, semantics, metamathematics (J. H. Woodger, Trans.) Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
58.
Thomasson, A. L. (2003). Realism and human kinds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67(3), 580-609.
59.
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
60.
Watkins, J. (1984). Science and skepticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
Williamson, O. E. (1996). Economic organization: The case for candor. Academy of Management Review, 21, 48-57.
62.
Zinkhan, R., & Hirschheim, R. (1992). Truth in marketing theory and research: An alternative perspective. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 80-88.
