Meckler and Baillie on Truth and Objectivity

Abstract

In the September 2003 issue, Meckler and Baillie correctly argued that social constructionists need not deny the importance of truth or objectivity. This comment probes their understanding of those two concepts. The view that truth entails correspondence with the facts, although not false, is not helpful. Our understanding of truth must be able to encompass the truth of normative claims and counterfactuals and of “deeper” truths. Meckler and Baillie’s view that an objective statement is one that is independent of our beliefs is also challenged. All statements depend on our beliefs but these beliefs are themselves more or less plausible and self-evident. An objective statement can thus be understood as one whose background conditions are viewed as reasonable or self-evident. Various implications follow: Objectivity is a matter of degree, and one can reasonably speak of the objectivity of our norms as much as the objectivity of our fact claims.

Keywords

truth objectivity social construction Mark Meckler James Baillie

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Augustine . (1961). Confessions (R. S. Pine-Coffin, Trans.). London: Penguin.

Duhem, P. (1998). Physical theory and experiment. In M. Curd & J. A. Cover (Eds.), Philosophy of science: The central issues (pp. 257-279). New York: Norton.

Foucault, M. (1994). Dits et écrits: 1954-1988 [Words and writings: 1954-1988]. Paris: Gallimard.

Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum.

Goodman, N. (1983). Fact, fiction, and forecast (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action I: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon.

Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and application (C. Cronin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Harmon, M. , & Mayer, R. (1986). Organization theory for public administration. Boston: Little, Brown.

Hodges, W. (1977). Logic. London: Penguin.

10.

James, W. (1995). Pragmatism. New York: Dover.

11.

Kant, I. (1930). Critique of pure reason (N. K. Smith, Trans.). London: Macmillan.

12.

Lynn, J. , & Jay, A. (1989). The complete yes prime minister. London: BBC Books.

13.

Meckler, M. , & Baillie, J. (2003). The truth about social construction in administrative science. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(3), 273-284.

14.

Peirce, C. (1966). Selected writings. New York: Dover.

15.

Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth, and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.

18.

Swift, J. (1985). Gulliver’s travels. New York: Modern Library.

19.

Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences ( E. A. Shils & H. A. Finch , Eds.). New York: Glencoe.

20.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society ( G. Roth & C. Wittich , Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

21.

Williamson, C. (1995). Statements and sentences. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy (pp. 850-851). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.