The Impact of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding on Midface Growth in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Objective

Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) can optimize aesthetic outcomes in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP), particularly in those with wider clefts. However, its impact on long-term postoperative sequelae such as midface hypoplasia (MFH) remains unclear. This study analyzed cephalometric data to evaluate NAM's effect on MFH in patients with complete unilateral CLP (UCLP).

Design

Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.

Patients

Included studies reported cephalometrics of patients ≥ 7 years old with repaired UCLP who underwent presurgical NAM versus no-NAM (control). Studies of bilateral cases or unoperated clefts were excluded.

Main Outcome Measures

Main outcomes were cephalometric angles (sella-nasion-A point (SNA), sella-nasion-B point (SNB), and A point-nasion-B point (ANB)) of patients treated with NAM vs. no-NAM.

Results

Of 2063 articles, three met inclusion criteria. Cephalometrics were reported for 171 patients (89 NAM, 82 no-NAM) at an average age of 8.5 ± 0.9 years. On pooled analysis, compared to the no-NAM cohort, the NAM cohort had insignificantly smaller SNA (78.8°±1.5° vs. 76.7°±1.5°, p = 0.169), SNB (75.5°±1.0° vs. 75.5°±1.0°, p = 0.954), and ANB (3.6°±1.4° vs. 1.23°±1.2°, p = 0.089) angles. Upon meta-analysis, compared to the no-NAM cohort, the NAM cohort had significantly smaller SNA (Mean Difference (MD) −1.96 [−3.31 to −0.61], p = 0.005) and ANB angles (MD −2.22 [−3.20 to −1.24], p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis revealed that patients with UCLP who underwent presurgical NAM had significantly smaller SNA and ANB angles, possibly indicating worse MFH. Before choosing NAM, clinicians should consider CLP severity, potential sagittal growth restrictions, and feasibility, particularly in low-resource settings.

Keywords

nasoalveolar molding midface hypoplasia cleft lip and palate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alzain

Batwa

Cash

Murshid

. Presurgical cleft lip and palate orthopedics: an overview. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2017;9:53–59. doi:10.2147/CCIDE.S129598

Wlodarczyk

Wolfswinkel

Fahradyan

, et al. Nasoalveolar molding: assessing the burden of care. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):574–577.

Jacob

Fahradyan

Paulson

, et al. Incidence of orthognathic surgery in patients with repaired cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(10S):60–61.

Mars

Plint

Houston

Bergland

Semb

. The Goslon Yardstick: A new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24(4):314–322.

Dunworth

Porras Fimbres

Trotta

, et al. Systematic review and critical appraisal of the evidence base for nasoalveolar molding (NAM). Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024;61(4):654–677.

Peanchitlertkajorn

Mercado

Daskalogiannakis

, et al. An intercenter comparison of dental arch relationships and craniofacial form including a center using nasoalveolar molding. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(6):821–829.

Kornbluth

Campbell

Daskalogiannakis

, et al. Active presurgical infant orthopedics for unilateral cleft lip and palate: Intercenter outcome comparison of latham, modified McNeil, and nasoalveolar molding. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(5):639–648.

Rubin

Clouston

SAP

Esenlik

Shetye

Flores

Grayson

. Midface growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with a nasoalveolar molding protocol. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(6):1640–1643.

Yarholar

Shen

Wangsrimongkol

, et al. The nasoalveolar molding cleft protocol: long-term treatment outcomes from birth to facial maturity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(5):787e–794e.

10.

Peltomäki

Vendittelli

Grayson

Cutting

Brecht

. Associations between severity of clefting and maxillary growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with infant orthopedics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(6):582–586.

11.

Honda

Suzuki

Nakamura

Ohishi

. Relationship between primary palatal form and maxillofacial growth in Japanese children with unilateral cleft lip and palate: infancy to adolescence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39(5):527–534.

12.

Liao

Y-F

Yang

I-Y

Wang

Yun

Huang

C-S

. Two-stage palate repair with delayed hard palate closure is related to favorable maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(5):1503–1510.

13.

Chiu

Y-T

Liao

Y-F

Chen

PK-T

. Initial cleft severity and maxillary growth in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(2):189–195.

14.

Hsieh

Y-J

Liao

Y-F

Shetty

. Predictors of poor dental arch relationship in young children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(4):1261–1266.

15.

Doucet

J-C

Delestan

Montoya

, et al. New neonatal classification of unilateral cleft lip and palate part 2: to predict permanent lateral incisor agenesis and maxillary growth. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(5):533–539.

16.

Liao

Y-F

Mars

. Long-term effects of palate repair on craniofacial morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(6):594–600.

17.

Suzuki

Mukai

Ohishi

Miyanoshita

Tashiro

. Relationship between cleft severity and dentocraniofacial morphology in Japanese subjects with isolated cleft palate and complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30(2):175–181.

18.

Chiu

Y-T

Liao

Y-F

. Is cleft severity related to maxillary growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate? Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(5):535–540.

19.

Broder

Flores

Clouston

, et al. Surgeon’s and caregivers’ appraisals of primary cleft lip treatment with and without nasoalveolar molding: a prospective multicenter pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(3):938–945.

20.

Celie

K-B

Wlodarczyk

Naidu

, et al. Sagittal growth restriction of the midface following isolated cleft lip repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024;61(1):20–32.

21.

James

Brook

. Maxillary hypoplasia in patients with cleft lip and palate deformity–the alternative surgical approach. Eur J Orthod. 1985;7(4):231–247.

22.

Meazzini

Donati

Garattini

Brusati

. Maxillary growth impairment in cleft lip and palate patients: a simplified approach in the search for a cause. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19(5):1302–1307.

23.

Ishikawa

Nakamura

Misaki

Kudoh

Fukuda

Yoshida

. Scar tissue distribution on palates and its relation to maxillary dental arch form. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35(4):313–319.

24.

Von den Hoff

Maltha

Kuijpers-Jagtman

. Palatal wound healing: the effects of scarring on growth. In: Berkowitz

, ed. Cleft Lip and Palate: Diagnosis and Management. Springer; 2013:309–324.

25.

Isik Aslan

Gülşen

Findikçioğlu

Uzuner

Üçüncü

. Effects of nasoalveolar molding therapy on alveolar and palatal cleft deformities in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(2):e179–e184.

26.

Parhofer

Rau

Strobel

, et al. The impact of passive alveolar molding vs. nasoalveolar molding on cleft width and other parameters of maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip palate. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(9):5001–5009.

27.

S-H

Baek

S-H

Choi

J-Y

Lee

J-H

Kim

S-W

. Cephalometric predictors of future need for orthognathic surgery in Korean patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate despite long-term use of facemask with miniplate. Korean J Orthod. 2021;51(1):43–54.

28.

Lin

Kim

P-J

Baek

S-H

Kim

H-G

Kim

S-W

Chung

J-H

. Early prediction of the need for orthognathic surgery in patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate using machine learning and longitudinal lateral cephalometric analysis data. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):616–620.

29.

Heliövaara

Leikola

. Prediction of orthognathic surgery need in children with unilateral cleft lip palate: dental arch relationships and 5-year-olds’ index. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24(4):528–535.

30.

Alfonso

Park

Kalra

, et al. The burden of care of nasoalveolar molding: an institutional experience. J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(2):602–607.

31.

Garcés Alvear

Moreno Soza

MIB

Ormeño Quintana

ADP

Gutiérrez Melis

. Complications during grayson presurgical nasoalveolar molding method in nonsyndromic infants with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(6):2159–2162.