This study aimed to investigate how ear shape in adults changes with age and ethnicity among four Chinese minority groups: Buyi, Tibetan, Tu, and Salar.
Design
We employed a combined approach using linear measurements and 2D geometric morphometrics to comprehensively assess ear shape variation.
Results
Our findings revealed a significant effect of age on ear shape, independent of overall size. Specifically, older adults exhibited a slender helix and antihelix especially in the lower region. Interestingly, the helix showed elongation, while the antihelix became shorter, and the tragus position shifted upwards. While linear measurements increased with age, the overall size (centroid size) remained constant. Although ethnicity displayed greater variability in ear shape compared to age and size, our analysis using Principal Component Analysis and random forest models did not reveal statistically significant differences between the four ethnic groups.
Conclusion
This study suggests that genetic factors play a relatively minor role in shaping ear variation, similar to other cranial features.
AdhikariKRealesGSmithAJP, et al.A genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci for variation in human ear morphology. Nat Commun. 2015/06/24 2015;6(1):7500. doi:10.1038/ncomms8500
2.
AbazaARossAHebertCHarrisonMAFNixonMS. A survey on ear biometrics. ACM computing Surveys (CSUR). 2013;45(2):1-35.
3.
ColemanMNColbertMW. Correlations between auditory structures and hearing sensitivity in non-human primates. J Morphol. 2010;271(5):511-532.
4.
ColemanMNRossCF. Primate auditory diversity and its influence on hearing performance. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2004;281(1):1123-1137.
5.
AllenJA. The influence of physical conditions in the genesis of species. Radical Review. 1877;1:108-140.
6.
AzariaRAdlerNSilfenRRegevDHaubenDJ. Morphometry of the adult human earlobe: A study of 547 subjects and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(7):2398-2402. doi:10.1097/01.Prs.0000060995.99380.De
7.
KalciogluMTMimanMCTopluYYakinciCOzturanO. Anthropometric growth study of normal human auricle. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67(11):1169-1177.
8.
FarkasLG. Anthropometry of normal and anomalous ears. Clin Plast Surg.1978;5(3):401-412.
9.
FerrarioVFSforzaCCiusaVSerraoGTartagliaGM. Morphometry of the normal human ear: A cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. Oct-Dec 1999;19(4):226-233.
10.
MurgodVAngadiPHallikerimathSKaleA. Anthropometric study of the external ear and its applicability in sex identification: Assessed in an Indian sample. Australian J Forensic Sci. 2013/12/01 2013;45(4):431-444. doi:10.1080/00450618.2013.767374
11.
EbohDEO. Morphological changes of the human pinna in relation to age and gender of Urhobo people in southern Nigeria. J Exp Clin Anat. July 1, 2013 2013;12(2):68-74. doi:10.4103/1596-2393.127964
12.
AsaiYYoshimuraMNagoNYamadaT. Correlation of ear length with age in Japan. Br Med J.1996;312(7030):582.
13.
MeijermanLVan Der LugtCMaatGJ. Cross-sectional anthropometric study of the external ear. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(2):286-293.
14.
HeathcoteJA. Why do old men have big ears?Br Med J.1995;311(7021):1668.
15.
FarkasLGKaticMJForrestCR, et al.International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16(4):615-646. doi:10.1097/01.scs.0000171847.58031.9e
16.
AlexanderKSStottDJSivakumarBKangN. A morphometric study of the human ear. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011/01/01/ 2011;64(1):41-47. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2010.04.005
17.
MartinR. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie in systematischer Darstellung: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der anthropologischen Methoden; für Studierende, Ärzte und Forschungsreisende. Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1914.
PalA. Ear lobe attachment of the Onge. Hum Hered. 1970;20(6):650-653. doi:10.1159/000152372
20.
El KollaliR. Earlobe morphology: A simple classification of normal earlobes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(2):277-280. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2008.01.046
21.
WienerA. Complications in ear genetics. J Hered. 1937;28(12):425-426.
22.
CarriéreR. Über erbliche Ohrformen, insbesondere das angewachsene Ohrläppchen. Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs-und Vererbungslehre. 1922;28(1):238-242.
23.
SharmaPD. The ear-lobe attachment among some Indian populations. J Anthropol Soc Nippon. 1970;78(2):157-161. doi:10.1537/ase1911.78.157
24.
LaiLYCWalshRJ. Observations on ear lobe types. Acta Genet Stat Med. 1966;16(3):250-257.
BruckerMJPatelJSullivanPK. A morphometric study of the external ear: Age- and sex-related differences. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 2003;112(2):647-652. discussion 653-4. doi:10.1097/01.Prs.0000070979.20679.1f
27.
PurkaitRSinghP. Anthropometry of the normal human auricle: A study of adult Indian men. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(4):372-379.
28.
ItoIImadaMIkedaMSuenoKArikuniTKidaA. A morphological study of age changes in adult human auricular cartilage with special emphasis on elastic fibers. Laryngoscope.2001;111(5):881-886.
29.
SharmaASidhuNKSharmaMKKapoorKSinghB. Morphometric study of ear lobule in northwest Indian male subjects. Anat Sci Int.2007;82(2):98-104.
30.
BurgeMBurgerW. Ear biometrics in computer vision. 2000:822-826 vol.2.
31.
El-NaggarSAbazaABourlaiT. Ear detection in the wild using faster R-CNN deep learning. 2018:1124-1130.
32.
CintasCQuinto-SánchezMAcuñaV, et al.Automatic ear detection and feature extraction using geometric morphometrics and convolutional neural networks. IET Biometrics. 2016;6(3):211-223.
33.
RoebuckJ. Advances in anthropometric accounting for ear digital modeling. 2013.
34.
YangRWuM. Education for ethnic minorities in China: A policy critique. SA-eDUC Journal. 2009;6(2):117-131.
35.
MackerrasC. Ethnicity in Asia. 1st ed. London; 2003.
36.
LiY-NZuoLWenBKeY-HHuangWJinL. Origins and migrations of bouyei people in China–insights from Y chromosome and mitochondrion (in Chinese). Acta Genet Sin.2002;29(3):196-200.
37.
ZhangL. Population data for 15 autosomal STR loci in the Bouyei ethnic minority from Guizhou Province, southwest China. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;17(0):108-109.
38.
HuAJ. An overview of the history and culture of the Xianbei (‘Monguor’/‘Tu’). Asian Ethnicity. 2010/02/01 2010;11(1):95-164. doi:10.1080/14631360903531958
39.
LuDLouHYuanK, et al.Ancestral origins and genetic history of Tibetan highlanders. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2016/09/01/ 2016;99(3):580-594. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.07.002
40.
YaoH-BWangC-CWangJ, et al.Genetic structure of Tibetan populations in Gansu revealed by forensic STR loci. Sci Rep. 2017/01/23 2017;7(1):41195. doi:10.1038/srep41195
41.
YuJ. The Study on the Genetic Diversity of 8 Population in China (In Chinese). Peking Union Medical College; 2002.
42.
LiuXShanKQiX, et al.Y-SNP analysis of Bouyei, Gelao, Mulao, Maonan, and Zhuang Populations in Guizhou (in Chinese). Hereditas. 2006;28(11):1350-1354. doi:10.1360/yc-006-1350
43.
SforzaCGrandiGBinelliMTommasiDGRosatiRFerrarioVF. Age-and sex-related changes in the normal human ear. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;187(1-3):110. e1-110. e7.
44.
KrishanKKanchanTThakurS. A study of morphological variations of the human ear for its applications in personal identification. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2019/01/24 2019;9(1):6. doi:10.1186/s41935-019-0111-0
45.
RohlfF. Tps Series. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook; 2010.
46.
DrakeAGKlingenbergCP. The pace of morphological change: Historical transformation of skull shape in st bernard dogs. Proc R Soc B. 2008;275(1630):71-76.
47.
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria; 2023. https://www.R-project.org/
48.
WickhamH. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer; 2016.
49.
WickhamHAverickMBryanJ, et al.Welcome to the Tidyverse. J Open Source Softw. 2019;4(43):1686.
50.
AdamsDCollyerMKaliontzopoulouASherrattE. Geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses. R package version 3.2.1. 2020.
51.
DrydenIL. shapes: Statistical shape analysis. R package version 1.2.5. 2019.
52.
DrydenILMardiaKV. Statistical Shape Analysis: with Applications in R. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
53.
SchlagerS. Morpho and Rvcg–shape analysis in R: r-packages for geometric morphometrics, shape analysis and surface manipulations. In: ZhengGLiSSzékelyG, eds. Statistical shape and deformation analysis. Academic Press; 2017:217-256.
54.
BozkırMGKarakaşPYavuzMDereF. Morphometry of the external ear in our adult population. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;30(1):81-85.
55.
BanKJungES. Ear shape categorization for ergonomic product design. Int J Ind Ergon. 2020/11/01/ 2020;80:102962. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102962
56.
AhmedAAOmerN. Estimation of sex from the anthropometric ear measurements of a Sudanese population. Leg Med. 2015/09/01/ 2015;17(5):313-319. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.03.002
57.
RelethfordJH. Craniometric variation among modern human populations. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994;95(1):53-62. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330950105
58.
von Cramon-TaubadelN. Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(49):19546-19551.
59.
ErikssonABettiLFriendAD, et al.Late Pleistocene climate change and the global expansion of anatomically modern humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(40):16089-16094.
