This study aims to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 and the current situation for cleft lip/palate treatment surgeries within Brazil's public health system.
Design
Our retrospective study analyzed CL/P corrective surgeries in Brazil's health system using DATASUS TabNet data from March 2020 to December 2022, with historical data from January 2016 to February 2020. We employed ARIMA analysis to estimate pandemic-related surgery cancellations.
Results
In 2020, 1992 (CI 95%: 989–2995) CL/P surgeries were not conducted due to pandemics, a 44.1% (CI 95%: 28.1–54.2%) decrease compared to expectations for march to December 2020. Between the onset of the pandemic in Brazil and the end of 2022, 10,643 surgeries were performed in the country, representing a 33.8% shortfall compared to the expected number for the period (16,076; 95% CI: 9697–22,456).
Conclusion
The study highlights COVID-19's impact on CL/P surgeries in Brazil. Post-pandemic, surgeries increased but regional disparities remain, urging collaborative efforts to improve services and support affected patients.
Nagem FilhoHMoraesNRochaRGF. Contribuição para o estudo da prevalência das más formações congênitas lábio-palatais na população escolar de bauru. Rev Fac Odont S Paulo. 1968;6(2):111-128.
2.
MassenburgBBHopperRACroweCS, et al.Global Burden of Disease 2017 Orofacial Clefting Collaborators. Global burden of orofacial clefts and the world surgical workforce. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;148(4):568e-580e. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008334
3.
American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial anomalies. Revised ed. American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association; 2009, p.16.
4.
VanderburgRAlonsoNDesaiP,et al.Age at primary cleft lip repair: A potential bellwether indicator for pediatric surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(6):e3657. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003657
5.
SouzaGRoncalliA. Factors associated with the delay in primary surgical treatment of cleft lip and palate in Brazil: a multilevel analysis. Ciênc. saúde coletiva. 2021;26(1):3505‐3515. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021269.2.23592019
6.
SilveiraDMMLMartelliDRBDiasVOSilveiraMSC daAlmeidaILFMartelli JúniorH, Surgical rehabilitation of cleft lip and/or palate: evaluation of the Brazilian public health system. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88(1):126‐132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.05.008
7.
CitronINetoJBCostaELimaCIseAMenezesCRoaLSalujaSStaffaSJda Silva FreitasR, et al.Patient-perceived barriers to surgical treatment of cleft lip and palate in Brazil: A multi-region study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(7):2375‐2386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.02.009
8.
SilveiraDMartelliDRBDiasVOSilveiraMAlmeidaILFMartelli JúniorH. Surgical rehabilitation of cleft lip and/or palate: Evaluation of the Brazilian public health system. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88(5):126-132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.05.008
TruchePCamposLNMarrazzoEBRangelAGBernardinoRBowderANBudaEBFariaIPompermaierLRiceHE, et alAssociation between government policy and delays in emergent and elective surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: a modeling study. Lancet Reg Health - Americas. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2021.100056
11.
MeredithJWHighKPFreischlagJA. Preserving elective surgeries in the COVID-19 pandemic and the future. JAMA. 2020;324(17):1725-1726. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.19594.
12.
ByrnesMEBrownCSDe RooAC, et al.Elective surgical delays due to COVID-19: The patient lived experience. Med Care. 2021;59(4):288-294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001503. Erratum in: Med Care. 2021 Aug 1;59(8):757.
AkaikeH. A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. In: ParzenETanabeKKitagawaG, eds. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer; 1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_16
15.
ZhengAFangQZhuYJiangCJinFWangX. An application of ARIMA model for predicting total health expenditure in China from 1978-2022. J Glob Health. 2020;10(1):010803. doi: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.10.010803
16.
EtooriDParkMHBlackburnRM, et al.Number and timing of primary cleft lip and palate repair surgeries in England: Whole nation study of electronic health records before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e071973. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071973
17.
McWilliamsDCostaBBligheS, et al.The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cleft lip and palate service delivery for new families in the United Kingdom: Medical and community service provider perspectives. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023;60(5):551-561. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221074870
18.
VanderburgRAgrawalKDesaiP, et al.Impact of COVID-19 on elective cleft surgery in low- and middle-income countries. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(6):e3656. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003656
19.
BruceMKPfaffMJAnstadtEE, et al.The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cleft care. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(4):e3587. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003587
20.
Rossell-PerryPGavino-GutierrezA. Cleft lip and palate surgery during COVID-19 pandemic. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9:e3692. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003692
21.
HaleTAngristNGoldszmidtR, et al.A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker). Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5:529-538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8
22.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa nacional de saúde: 2019: percepção do estado de saúde, estilos de vida, doenças crônicas e saúde bucal: Brasil e grandes regiões. IBGE, Coordenação de Trabalho e Rendimento. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2020. 113p.
23.
CarlsonLCHatcherKWTombergL, et al.Inequitable access to timely cleft palate surgery in low- and middle-income countries. World J Surg. 2016;40:1047-1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3374-0.
24.
SchefferMDemografia Médica no Brasil 2020. FMUSP, CFM; 2020, 312 p. ISBN: 978-65-00-12370-8.
25.
SchefferMCAlmeidaCJCassenoteAJF. Radar da Demografia Médica no Brasil. Informe Técnico N ° 1. Setembro/2023. 26 páginas. São Paulo, SP: FMUSP, AMB.
26.
SouzaGRoncalliA. Factors associated with the delay in primary surgical treatment of cleft lip and palate in Brazil: a multilevel analysis. Ciênc. saúde coletiva. 2021;26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021269.2.23592019
27.
SilveiraDMMLMartelliDRBDiasVOSilveiraMSCAlmeidaILFMartelli JúniorH.Surgical rehabilitation of cleft lip and/or palate: evaluation of the Brazilian public health system. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88:126‐132. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.05.008
FellMJHoyleTAbebeME, et al.The impact of a single surgical intervention for patients with a cleft lip living in rural Ethiopia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;2014. pii S1748- 6815(14)00246-0. doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.05.019.
30.
AlkireBHughesCDNashK, et al.Potential economic benefit of cleft lip and palate repair in sub-saharan Africa. World J Surg. 2011;35(6):1194-1201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1055-1.
31.
ChaoTESharmaKMandigoM, et al.Cost-effectiveness of surgery and its policy implications for global health: A systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e334-e345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70213-X. Epub 2014 May 21.
32.
MearaJGLeatherAJHaganderL, et al.Global surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016;25:75-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
