The Kay Pentax nasometer uses a separator plate that touches the philtrum of a patient to separate the nasal and oral sound energies for nasalance measurement. However, the separator plate can restrict the natural movement of the patient’s upper lip and generate unpleasant pressure on the patient’s philtrum. The present study was intended to measure nasalance scores without touching the philtrum for better comfort during speech assessment and therapy.
Methods:
Nasalance scores of 10 males and 10 females having no speech disorders were measured under 4 levels (0, 5, 10, and 15 mm) of the gap between the plate and the philtrum (denoted as plate-to-philtrum gap) using Nasometer II 6450 for nasal (Nasal Sentences) and oral (Zoo Passage) stimuli. Regression formulas were established to examine the relationships between nasalance score and plate-to-philtrum gap for the stimuli. To provide nasalance scores equivalent to those measured for the contact condition, compensation factors for the 5 mm plate-to-philtrum gap measurement condition were identified for the stimuli.
Results:
The nasalance scores were significantly different between the 4 different plate-to-philtrum gaps for the stimuli. Compensation factors for the Nasal Sentences and the Zoo Passage were identified as 1.17 and 0.71, respectively.
Conclusions:
The 5 mm plate-to-philtrum gap condition after multiplying the compensation factors can provide equivalent nasalance scores to the conventional contact measurement condition which may provide better comfort in speech assessment and therapy.
Abou-ElsaadTQuribaABazHElkassabyR. Standardization of nasometry for normal Egyptian Arabic speakers. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64(6):271–277.
2.
AndersonRT. Nasometric values for normal Spanish-speaking females: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33(4):333–336.
3.
ÅstenPAkreHPerssonC. Associations between speech features and phenotypic severity in Treacher Collins syndrome. BMC Med Genet. 2014;15(1):47.
4.
AwanSNBressmannTPoburkaBRoyNSharpHWattsC. Dialectical effects on nasalance: a multicenter, cross-continental study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58(1):69–77.
5.
AwanSNOmlorKWattsCR. Effects of computer system and vowel loading on measures of nasalance. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(5):1284–1294.
6.
BaeYCKimJHLeeJHwangSMKimSS. Comparative study of the extent of palatal lengthening by different methods. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48(4):359–364.
7.
BrunnegårdKvan DoornJ. Normative data on nasalance scores for Swedish as measured on the Nasometer: influence of dialect, gender, and age. Clin Linguist Phon. 2009;23(1):58–69.
8.
BrunnerMStellzig-EisenhauerAProschelUVerresRKomposchG. The effect of nasopharyngoscopic biofeedback in patients with cleft palate and velopharyngeal dysfunction. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(6):649–657.
9.
ClerGJMittelmanTBradenMNWoodnorthGHSteppCE. Video game rehabilitation of velopharyngeal dysfunction: a case series. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(6S):1800–1809.
10.
D’haeseleerEBettensKDe MetsSDe MoorVVan LierdeK. Normative data and dialectical effects on nasalance in Flemish adults. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015;67(3):42–48.
11.
DalstonRMWarrenDWDalstonET. Use of nasometery as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991a;28(2):184–188.
12.
DalstonRMWarrenDWDalstonET. A preliminary investigation concerning the use of nasaometry in identifying patients with hyponasality and/or nasal airway obstruction. J Speech Hear Res. 1991b;34(1):11–18.
13.
De BoerGBressmannT. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometers 6200 and 6450. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(1):90–97.
14.
DerenOAyhanMTuncelAGörgüMAltuntaşAKutlayRErdoğanB. The correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency by Furlow palatoplasty in patients older than 3 years undergoing Veau-Wardill-Kilner palatoplasty: a prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(1):85–93.
15.
El-KassabiRMHassanSMesallamTAMalkiKHFarahatMAlfarisA. Standardization of nasalance scores in normal Saudi speakers. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015;40(5):77–85.
16.
EspositoSJMitsumotoHShanksM. Use of palatal lift and palatal augmentation prostheses to improve dysarthria in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a case series. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(7):90–98.
17.
EstremTBroenPA. Early speech production of children with cleft palate. J Speech Hear Res. 1989;32(1):12–23.
18.
FaléIHub FariaI. Nasometric values for European Potuguese: preliminary results. Paper Presented at: the 2nd ISCA Workshop on Experimental Linguistics; August2008; Athens, Greece.
19.
FletcherSG. “Nasalance” vs. listener judgements of nasality. Cleft Palate J. 1976;13:31–44.
Gildersleeve-NeumannCEDalstonRM. Nasalance scores in noncleft individuals: why not zero?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(1):106–111.
22.
GunerenEUysalOA. The quantitative evaluation of palatal elongation after Furlow palatoplasty. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(3):446–450.
23.
GuyetteTWPolleyJWFigueroaASmithBE. Changes in speech following maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(6):199–205.
24.
HaSChoSH. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children: effects of age, vowel context, and stimulus length. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(4):1235–1239.
25.
HaapanenML. Nasalance scores in normal Finnish speech. Folia Phoniatr. 1991;43(4):197–203.
26.
HamdanALZiadeGJabbourJKhneizerGKutkutI. Nasalance scores in Lebanese English-speaking adults using nasometric analysis. J Med Liban. 2015;63(4):203–208.
27.
HirschbergJBókSJuhászMTrenovszkiZVotiskyPHirschbergA. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;70(1):785–798.
28.
HosseinabadHHDerakhshandehFMostaajeranFAbdaliHDavariHAHassanzadehAKummerAW. Incidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency and oronasal fistulae after cleft palate repair: a retrospective study of children referred to Isfahan cleft care team between 2005 and 2009. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(10):1722–1726.
29.
IbrahimHMReillySKilpatrickN. Normative nasalance scores for the Malay language. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(5):e61–e63.
30.
KavanaghMLFeeEJKalinowskiJDoylePCLeeperHA. Nasometric values for three dialectal groups within the Atlantic provinces of Canada. Can J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 1994;18(2):7–13.
31.
KayElemetrics. Nasometer II Model 6400/6402: Installation, Operations, and Maintenance Manual. Kay Elemetrics Corp; 2003.
32.
KimHKYuXMCaoYJLiuXMHuangZM. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance for a Mandarin population. Clin Linguist Phon. 2016;30(2):119–130.
33.
KooSKKwonSBKimYJJungSHMoonJS. A study on voice change after septoplasty with turbine plasty. Kore J Otorhinol Head Neck Surg. 2016;59(5):377–382.
KummerAW. Disorders of resonance and airflow secondary to cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction. Semin Speech Lang. 2011;32(2):141-149.
36.
KummerAW. Anatomy and physiology: facial, oral and velopharyngeal structures. In: KummerAW, ed. Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies: Effects on Speech and Resonance. Delmar Cengage Learning; 2014:3-38.
37.
KummerAWMarshallJLWilsonMM. Non-cleft causes of velopharyngeal dysfunction: implications for treatment. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(3):286–295.
38.
KuppusamyGRamaswamyGMariswamyP. Normative nasalance values across stimuli and gender in Malayalam speaking individuals. Otolaryngol Online J. 2013;3(4):1–12.
LiapiAHiraniSRubinJ. Changes in nasal resonance following septoplasty in adults: acoustic and perceptual characteristics. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015;41(3):93–100.
41.
LuytenAD’haeseleerEHodgesAGaliwangoGBudolfsenTVermeerschHVan LierdeK. Normative nasalance data in Ugandan English-speaking children. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64(3):131–136.
42.
MaturoDSPicinato-PirolaMNCRiczLNATrawitzkiLVV. Nasalance of Brazilian Portuguese-speaking populations from two different states. Co DAS. 2017;29(1):e20160041.
43.
MawARJeansWDCableHR. Adenoidectomy. a prospective study to show clinical and radiological changes two years after operation. J Laryngol Otol. 1983;97(5):511–518.
44.
MayoCMMayoR. Normative nasalance scores across languages. ECHO. 2011;6(3):
22–32.
45.
MayoRFloydLAWarrenDWDalstonRMMayoCM. Nasalance and nasal cross-sectional area: cross-racial study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33(6):143–149.
46.
MishimaKSugiiAYamadaTImuraHSugaharaT. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance scores in a Japanese population. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36(3):8–10.
47.
MurisonMSPigottRW. Medial Langenbeck: experience of a modified Von Langenbeck repair of the cleft palate. a preliminary report. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45(6):454–459.
48.
MurrayESHMendozaJOGillSVPerkellJSSteppCE. Effects of biofeedback on control and generalization of nasalization in typical speakers. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(3):1025–1034.
49.
NandurkarA. Nasalance measures in Marathi consonant-vowel-consonant syllables with pressure consonants produced by children with and without cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39(1):59–65.
NicholsAC. Nasalance statistics for two Mexican populations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36(1):58–63.
52.
OkalidouAKarathanasiAGrigorakiE. Nasalance norms in Greek adults. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011;25(8):671–688.
53.
OrticocheaM. The timing and management of dynamic muscular pharyngeal sphincter construction in velopharyngeal incompetence. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52(2):85–87.
54.
ParkMBaekWSLeeEKohKSKimBKBaekR. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(2):173–177.
55.
PennaVBannaschHStarkGB. The turbinate flap for oronasal fistula closure. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(6):679–681.
56.
Pinborough-ZimmermanJCanadyCYamashiroDKMoralesLJr. Articulation and nasality changes resulting from sustained palatal fistula obturation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35(1):81–87.
57.
PrathaneeBThanaviratananichSPongjunyakulARengpatanakijK. Nasalance scores for speech in normal Thai children. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003;37(6):351–355.
58.
RochetAPRochetBLSovisEAMielkeDL. Characteristics of nasalance in speakers of western Canadian English and French. Can J Speech-Lang Pathol Audiology. 1998;22(1):94–103.
59.
SadjadiVGhorbaniATorabinezhadFAmiriYKeyhaniMR. The effect of vocal loudness on nasalance of vowels in Persian adults. Iran Rehab J. 2010;8(12):31–35.
60.
SeaverEJDalstonRMLeeperHAAdamsLE. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34(4):71–721.
61.
SteinhauerKGrayhackJP. The role of knowledge of results in performance and learning of a voice motor task. J Voice. 2000;14(2):137–145.
62.
SweeneyTSellDO’ReganM. Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Irish children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41(2):168–174.
63.
TunaSHPekkanGGumusHOAktasA. Prosthetic rehabilitation of velopharyngeal insufficiency: pharyngeal obturator prostheses with different retention mechanisms. Eur J Dent. 2010;4(1):81–87.
64.
Van der HeijdenPHobbelHHVan der LaanBFKorsten-MeijerAGGoorhuis-BrouwerSM. Nasometry normative data for young Dutch children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75(3):420–424.
65.
van DoornJPurcellA. Nasalance levels in the speech of normal Australian children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35(4):287–292.
66.
Van LierdeKMVan BorselJCardinaelAReeckmansSBonteK. The impact of vocal intensity and pitch modulation on nasalance scores: a pilot study. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(1):21–26.
67.
Van LierdeKMWuytsFLDe BodtMVan CauwenbergeP. Age-related patterns of nasal resonance in normal Flemish children and young adults. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003;37(2):344–350.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
