To identify child-, surgeon-, and hospital-specific factors at the time of primary cleft lip repair that are associated with the use of secondary cleft lip surgery.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
Forty-nine pediatric hospitals.
Participants:
Children who underwent cleft lip repair between 1999 and 2015.
Main outcome measure:
Time from primary cleft lip repair to secondary lip surgery.
Results:
By 5 years after primary lip repair, 24.0% of children had undergone a secondary lip surgery. In multivariable analysis, primary lip repair before 3 months had a 1.22-fold increased hazard of secondary surgery (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.46) compared to repair at 7 to 12 months of age, and children with multiple congenital anomalies had a 0.77-fold decreased hazard of secondary surgery (95% CI: 0.68-0.87). After adjusting for cleft type, age at repair, presence of multiple congenital anomalies, and procedure volume, there remained substantial variation in secondary surgery use among surgeons and hospitals (P < .01). For children with unilateral cleft lip repaired at 3 to 6 months of age, the predicted proportion of children undergoing secondary surgery within 5 years of primary repair ranged from 4.9% to 21.8% across surgeons and from 4.5% to 24.7% across hospitals.
Conclusions:
There are substantial differences among surgeons and hospitals in the rates of secondary lip surgery. Further work is needed to identify causes for this variation among providers.
AbyholmFEBorchgrevinkHCEskelandG.Cleft lip and palate in Norway. III. Surgical treatment of CLP patients in Oslo 1954-75. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;15(1):15–28.
2.
AdetayoAMJamesOAdeyemoWLOgunleweMOButaliA. Unilateral cleft lip repair: a comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques using quantitative (anthropometry) assessment. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;44(1):3–11.
3.
AndersonJBBeekmanRHIIIKuglerJDRosenthalGLJenkinsKJKlitznerTSMartinGRNeishSRDarbieLKingE, et al.Use of a learning network to improve variation in interstage weight gain after the Norwood operation. Congenit Heart Dis. 2014;9(6):512–520.
4.
Asher-McDadeCBrattstromVDahlEMcWilliamJMolstedKPlintDAPrahl-AndersenBSembGShawWCTheRP. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(5):409–412.
5.
BekiszJMFrymlEFloresRL. A Review of randomized controlled trials in cleft and craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(2):293–301.
6.
BongaartsCAvan ‘t HofMAPrahl-AndersenBDirksIVKuijpers-JagtmanAM. Infant orthopedics has no effect on maxillary arch dimensions in the deciduous dentition of children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(6):665–672.
7.
BrattstromVMolstedKPrahl-AndersenBSembGShawWC. The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(1):69–77.
8.
BrittoMTFullerSCKaplanHCKotagalULannonCMargolisPAMuethingSESchoettkerPJSeidM. Using a network organisational architecture to support the development of Learning Healthcare Systems. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(11):937–946.
9.
BrittonLAlberyLBowdenMHarding-BellAPhippenGSellD. A cross-sectional cohort study of speech in five-year-olds with cleft palate +/- lip to support development of national audit standards: benchmarking speech standards in the United kingdom. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(4):431–451.
10.
CassellCHDanielsJMeyerRE. Timeliness of primary cleft lip/palate surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(6):588–597.
11.
CassellCHMeyerRDanielsJ. Health care expenditures among Medicaid enrolled children with and without orofacial clefts in North Carolina, 1995-2002. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008;82(11):785–794.
12.
CassellCHMeyerREFarelAM. Predictors of referral to the North Carolina Child Service Coordination Program among infants with orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(1):45–51.
13.
CohenSRCorriganMWilmotJTrotmanCA. Cumulative operative procedures in patients aged 14 years and older with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast and Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(2):267–271.
14.
CrandallWKappelmanMDCollettiRBLeibowitzIGrunowJEAliSBaronHIBermanJHBoyleBCohenS, et al.ImproveCareNow: the development of a pediatric inflammatory bowel disease improvement network. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17(1):450–457.
15.
CrockettDJGoudySL. Cleft lip and palate. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2014;22(4):573–586.
16.
DaskalogiannakisJMercadoARussellKHathawayRDugasGLongREJrCohenMSembGShawW. The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: Part 3. Analysis of craniofacial form. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(3):252–258.
17.
de Agostino Biella PassosVde Carvalho CarraraCFda Silva DalbenGCostaBGomideMR. Prevalence, cause, and location of palatal fistula in operated complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: retrospective study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(2):158–164.
18.
EssickGKPhillipsCTrotmanC.Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part IV: between- and within-participant variables affecting lip vermilion sensory thresholds. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(6):624–634.
19.
FeudtnerCHaysRMHaynesGGeyerJRNeffJMKoepsellTD. Deaths attributed to pediatric complex chronic conditions: national trends and implications for supportive care services. Pediatrics. 2001;107(6):E99.
20.
FieldstonESShahSSHallMHainPDAlpernERDel BeccaroMAHardingJMacyML. Resource utilization for observation-status stays at children’s hospitals. Pediatrics. 2013;131(6):1050–1058.
21.
FriedeHEnemarkH. Long-term evidence for favorable midfacial growth after delayed hard palate repair in UCLP patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(4):323–329.
22.
GoodacreTEHentgesFMossTLShortVMurrayL. Does repairing a cleft lip neonatally have any effect on the longer-term attractiveness of the repair?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41(6):603–608.
23.
GoodmanEKReillyAFFisherBTFitzgeraldJLiYSeifAEHuangYSBagatellRAplencR. Association of weekend admission with hospital length of stay, time to chemotherapy, and risk for respiratory failure in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed leukemia at freestanding US children’s hospitals. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(10):925–931.
24.
HardwickeJNassimizadehMRichardB. Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in Cleft Lip and Palate: a 10-Year Review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(2):142–152.
25.
HeliovaaraARautioJ. A comparison of craniofacial cephalometric morphology and the later need for orthognathic surgery in 6-year-old cleft children. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011;39(3):173–176.
26.
HenkelKOGundlachKSakaB. Incidence of secondary lip surgeries as a function of cleft type and severity: one center’s experience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35(4):310–312.
27.
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
28.
LeeMKYenSLAllareddyV. Hospitalization outcomes of cleft lip repair in neonates across the United States. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(4):528–535.
29.
LithoviusRHYlikontiolaLPSandorGK. Frequency of pharyngoplasty after primary repair of cleft palate in northern Finland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;117(4):430–434.
30.
MackayDMazahariMGrahamWPJeffordsKLeberDGormanPLieserJDWryeSKutzRSaggersG. Incidence of operative procedures on cleft lip and palate patients. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42(4):445–448.
31.
MarsMAsher-McDadeCBrattstromVDahlEMcWilliamJMolstedKPlintDAPrahl-AndersenBSembGShawWC, et al.A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 3. Dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(5):405–408.
32.
McAteerJPLaRiviereCADrugasGTAbdullahFOldhamKTGoldinAB. Influence of surgeon experience, hospital volume, and specialty designation on outcomes in pediatric surgery: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(5):468–475.
33.
MonsonLAKhechoyanDYBuchananEPHollierLHJr. Secondary lip and palate surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41(2):301–309.
34.
MullikenJBLaBrieRA. Fourth-dimensional changes in nasolabial dimensions following rotation-advancement repair of unilateral cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(2):491–498.
35.
ReddySGReddyRRBronkhorstEMPrasadRKuijpers JagtmanAMBergeS. Comparison of three incisions to repair complete unilateral cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(4):1208–1216.
36.
SchonmeyrBWendbyLCampbellA.Early Surgical Complications After Primary Cleft Lip Repair: a Report of 3108 Consecutive Cases. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52(6):706–710.
37.
SembGBrattstromVMolstedKPrahl-AndersenBShawWC. The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate: Part 1. introduction and treatment experience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005a;42(1):64–68.
38.
SembGBrattstromVMolstedKPrahl-AndersenBZuurbierPRumseyNShawWC. The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 4: relationship among treatment outcome, patient/parent satisfaction, and the burden of care. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005b;42(1):83–92.
39.
SitzmanTJCarleACHeatonPCHelmrathMABrittoMT. Five-fold variation among surgeons and hospitals in the use of secondary palate surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(5):586–594.
40.
SitzmanTJCoyneSMBrittoMT. The Burden of care for children with unilateral cleft lip: a systematic review of revision surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(4):84–94.
41.
SitzmanTJGirottoJAMarcusJR. Current surgical practices in cleft care: unilateral cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):261e–270e.
42.
SitzmanTJMaraCALongREJrDaskalogiannakisJRussellKAMercadoAMHathawayRRCarleACSembGShawWC. The Americleft Project: burden of care from secondary surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(7):e442.
43.
SpiegelhalterDJ. Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med. 2005;24(8):1185–1202.
SteinSDunscheAGellrichNCHarleFJonasI. One- or two-stage palate closure in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: comparing cephalometric and occlusal outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(1):13–22.
46.
SwennenGBertenJLSchliephakeHTreutleinCDempfRMalevezCDeMA. Midfacial morphology in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by different surgical protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31(1):13–22.
47.
ThompsonJAHeatonPCKeltonCMSitzmanTJ. National Estimates of and Risk Factors for Inpatient Revision Surgeries for Orofacial Clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(1):60–69.
48.
TrotmanCBarlowSMFarawayJJ. Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part III: measurement of lip forces. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007a;44(6):617–623.
49.
TrotmanCFarawayJJLoskenHWvan AalstJA. Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part II: qualifications of nasolabial movement. Cleft Palate Craniofacl J. 2007b;44(6):607–616.
50.
TrotmanCAFarawayJJPhillipsCvan AalstJ. Effects of lip revision surgery in cleft lip/palate patients. J Dent Res. 2010;89(7):728–732.
51.
TrotmanCPhillipsCEssickGKFarawayJJBarlowSMLoskenWvan AalstJRogersL.Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part 1: study design and surgeon ratings of lip disability and need for lip revision. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007c;44(6):598–606.
52.
TukeyJW. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1977.
Weatherley-WhiteRCAKuehnDPMirrettPGilmanJI. Early repair and breast-feeding for infants with cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;79(6):879–887.
55.
WilhelmsenHRMusgraveRH. Complications of cleft lip surgery. Cleft Palate J. 1966;3(3):223–231.
56.
WilliamsACSandyJRThomasSSellDSterneJA. Influence of surgeon’s experience on speech outcome in cleft lip and palate. Lancet. 1999;354(9191):1697–1698.
57.
YangMEldridgeSMerloJ. Multilevel survival analysis of health inequalities in life expectancy. Int J Equity Health. 2009;8:31.
58.
ZaleckasLLinkevicieneLOlekasJKutraN. The comparison of different surgical techniques used for repair of complete unilateral cleft lip. Medicina (Kaunas). 2011;47(2):85–90.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
