Informant discrepancies on psychological measures may affect the assessment, classification, and treatment of children’s mental health. Concordance between different informants has been shown to be low to moderately correlated. The present study examined the agreement between children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and their parents.
Design:
Cross-sectional data from 7 consecutive birth cohorts based on routine psychological assessments at age 10 with comparisons to national reference groups.
Setting:
Centralized and multidisciplinary treatment setting.
Participants:
323 children age 10, born with CL/P and their parents (participation rate: 89%).
Outcome measures:
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).
Results:
Children born with CL/P and their parents tend to follow similar patterns of disagreement on the SDQ as reported in the general population, with children reporting more symptoms than their parents, and boys having more problems than girls on most subscales. Child and parent reports were low to moderately correlated, and not affected by the child’s gender or the presence of conditions additional to the cleft.
Conclusions:
Differences between informants on the SDQ reflect different perspectives of the child’s adjustment, and both informants are important in the assessment of mental health. Children with CL/P and their parents do not significantly differ from children and parents in the general population on their agreement of the child’s psychological adjustment. As with the general population, clinical assessments should be based on a mixture of both informants’ reports.
AchenbachTMBeckerADöpfnerMHeiervangERoessnerVSteinhausenHCRothenbergerA. Multicultural assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology with ASEBA and SDQ instruments: research findings, application, and future directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;49:251–275.
2.
AchenbachTMMcConaughySHHowellCT. Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull. 1987;101:213–232.
3.
BergerZEDaltonLJ. Coping with a cleft: psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46:435–443.
4.
De Los ReyesAKazdinAE. Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychol Bull. 2005;13:483–509.
5.
EndrigaMCKapp-SimonKA. Psychological issues in craniofacial care: state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36:3–9.
6.
FeragenKB. Congenital conditions. In: RumseyNHarcourtD, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Psychology of Appearance. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012:353–371.
7.
FeragenKBStockNM. When there is more than a cleft: Psychological adjustment when a cleft is associated with an additional condition. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;5:5–14.
8.
FeragenKBStockNMKvalemIL. Risk and protective factors at age 16: psychological adjustment in adolescents with a cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015; 52:555–573.
9.
FeragenKBStockNMRumseyN. Toward a reconsideration of inclusion and exclusion criteria in cleft lip and palate: implications for psychological research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;5:569–78.
10.
GkanditisNPapamanouDAKaramolegkouMDorotheouD. Esthetic, functional and everyday life assessment of individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:510395.
11.
GoodmanR. The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999;40:791–799.
12.
GoodmanR. Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40:1337–1345.
13.
GoodmanRFordTSimmonsHGatwardRMeltzerH. Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry. 2000a;177:534–539.
14.
GoodmanRRenfrewDMullickM. Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000b;9:129–134.
15.
HuntOBurdenDHepperPJohnstonC. The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:274–285.
16.
HuntOBurdenDHepperPStevensonMJohnstonC. Self-reports of psychosocial functioning among children and young adults with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43:598–605.
17.
IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation; 2013.
18.
KlassenAFTsangarisEForrestCRWongKWYPusicALCanoSJSyedIDuaMKainthSJohnsonJ. Quality of life of children treated for cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:547–557.
19.
MileradJLarsonOHagbergCIdebergM. Associated malformations in infants with cleft lip and palate: a prospective, population-based study. Pediatrics. 1997;100:180–186.
20.
MartinezMSmith CarterJLegatoLJ. Social competence in children with chronic illness: a meta-analytic review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011;36:878–890.
21.
MorrisSBDeShonRP. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:105–107.
22.
MossTP. The relationships between objective and subjective ratings of disfigurement severity, and psychological adjustment. Body Image. 2005;2:151–159.
23.
NelsonPGlennyAMKirkSCaressAL. Parents’ experiences of caring for a child with a cleft lip and/or palate: a review of the literature. Child Care Health Dev. 2011;38:6–20.
24.
ObelCHeiervangERodriguezAHeyerdahlSSmedjeHSouranderAGudmundssonOOClench-AasJChristensenEHeianF. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the Nordic countries. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;13:32–39.
25.
OffordDRBoyleMDRacineYSzatmariPFlemingJESanfordMLipmanEL. Integrating assessment data from multiple informants. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;35:1078–1085.
26.
OngJClarkeAWhitePJohnsonMWitheySButlerPE. Does severity predict distress? The relationship between subjective and objective measures of appearance and psychological adjustment during treatment for facial lipoatrophy. Body Image. 2007;4:239–248.
27.
OosterkampBCMDijkstraPURemmelinkHJvan OortRPGoorhuis-BrouwerSMSandhamAde BontLGM. Satisfaction with treatment outcome in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36:890–895.
28.
PinquartMShenY. Behavior problems in children and adolescents with chronic physical illness: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011;36:1003–1016.
29.
RumseyNHarcourtD. The Psychology of Appearance. New York, NY: Open University Press; 2005.
30.
SmithSR. Making sense of multiple informants in child and adolescent psychopathology a guide for clinicians. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2007;25;139–149.
31.
StockNMFeragenKB. Psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate: a narrative review of the literature. Psychol Health. 2016;15:1–37.
32.
StockNMRumseyN. Parenting a child with a cleft: the father’s perspective. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52:31–43.
33.
Swanenburg de VeyeHFBeemerFAMellenberghGJWoltersWHHeineman-de BoerJA. An investigation of the relationship between associated congenital malformations and the mental and psychomotor development of children with clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003;40:297–303.
34.
ThompsonAKentG. Adjusting to disfigurement: processes involved in dealing with being visibly different. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21:663–682.
35.
UptonPLawfordJEiserC. Parent–child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: a review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:895–913.
36.
van der MeerMDixonARoseD. Parent and child agreement on reports of problem behavior obtained from a screening questionnaire, the SDQ. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;17:491–497.
37.
Van RoyBGrøholtBHeyerdahlSClench-AasJ. Self-reported strengths and difficulties in a large Norwegian population 10–19 years. Age and gender specific results of the extended SDQ questionnaire. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;15:189–198.
38.
Van RoyBGrøholtBHeyerdahlSClench-AasJ. Understanding discrepancies in parent-child reporting of emotional and behavioral problems: effects of relational and socio-demographic factors. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10:56–68.
39.
Van RoyBVeenstraMClench-AasJ. Construct validity of the five-factor Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;49:1304–1312.
40.
VostanisP. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: research and clinical applications. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006;19:367–372.
41.
WatersEStewart-BrownSFitzpatrickR. Agreement between adolescent self-report and parent reports of health and well-being: results of an epidemiological study. Child Care Health Dev. 2003;29:501–509.
42.
Wilson-GendersonMBroderHLPhillipsC. Concordance between caregiver and child reports of children’s oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35:32–40.
