Sibling relationships are among the most unique social connections, significantly affecting psychosocial adjustment. Previous reviews in the fields of chronic illness and disability have concluded that unaffected siblings of children with long-term conditions are at risk of poorer psychological functioning as a consequence. Much research has investigated the psychosocial impact of CL/P on affected individuals and their parents, yet comparatively little is known about the impact on other close family members.
Objective
To gain a better understanding of the experience of unaffected siblings of children born with CL/P, with a view to informing service provision and support.
Design
Individual qualitative interviews conducted over the telephone/Internet with five siblings and eight parents, including five sibling-parent pairs from the same family.
Results
Thematic analysis identified three key themes applicable across both parent and sibling interviews: perceptions of positive and negative impacts, factors affecting the degree of impact, and support for families.
Conclusions
This study provides insight into a population that is often overlooked in the context of cleft care. The analysis identified a number of sibling support and information needs, along with suggestions of how to incorporate support for siblings in practice. The findings suggest that an inclusive approach to health care encompassing all members of the family is essential for optimal familial adjustment.
AnthonyK.K., GilK.M., SchanbergL.E.Brief report: parental perceptions of child vulnerability in children with chronic illness.J Pediatr Psychol.2003; 28: 185–190.
2.
Appearance Research Collaboration.Identifying Factors and Processes Contributing to Successful Adjustment to Disfiguring Conditions: Final Report.Bristol: University of the West of England, Centre for Appearance Research; 2009.
3.
BensonB.A., GrossA.M., KellumG.The siblings of children with craniofacial anomalies.Children's Health Care.1999; 28: 51–68.
4.
BraunV., ClarkeV.Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qual Res Psychol.2006; 3: 77–101.
5.
British Psychological Society.Code of Ethics and Conduct: Guidance by the Ethics Committee of the British Psychological Society.Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society; 2009.
6.
BrodyG.H.Sibling relationship quality: its causes and consequences.Ann Rev Psychol.1998; 49: 1–24.
7.
BurkeP., MontgomeryS.Brothers and sisters: supporting the siblings of children with disabilities.Practice: Social Work Action.2001; 13: 27–38.
8.
CarterJ.K.Skype: a cost-effective method for qualitative research.Rehab Couns Educ J.2011; 4: 3–4.
9.
ChangP-C, YehC-H. Agreement between child self-report and parent proxy-report to evaluate quality of life in children with cancer.Psychooncology.2005; 14: 125–134.
10.
ErdleyC.A., NangleD.W., NewmanJ.E., CarpenterE.M.Children's friendship experiences and psychological adjustment: theory and research.New Direct Child Adolesc Dev.2001; 91: 5–24.
11.
FauxS.A.Sibling relationships in families with congenitally impaired children.J Pediatr Nurs.1991; 6: 175–184.
12.
FawknerH.J.Gender. In: RumseyN., HarcourtD., eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Psychology of Appearance.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press;2013: 175–189.
13.
FeragenK.B., KvalemI.L., RumseyN., BorgeA.I.H.Adolescents with and without a facial difference: the role of friendships and social acceptance in perceptions of appearance and emotional resilience.Body Image.2010; 7: 271–279.
14.
FeragenK.B., SærvoldT., AuknerR., StockN.M.Speech, language, and reading in 10-year-olds with cleft: associations with teasing, satisfaction with speech and psychological adjustment.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. In press.
15.
FeragenK.B., StockN.M.When there is more than a cleft: psychological adjustment when a cleft is associated with an additional condition.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2014; 51: 5–14.
16.
FishmanD.B.The Case for Pragmatic Psychology.New York: NYU Press;1999.
GoodmanR.Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.2001; 40: 1337–1345.
19.
HowittD., CramerD.Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology.3rd ed.Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited;2011.
20.
HullmannS.E., Wolfe-ChristensenC., MeyerW.H., McNall-KnappR.Y., MullinsL.L.The relationship between parental overprotection and health-related quality of life in pediatric cancer: the mediating role of perceived child vulnerability.Quality Life Res.2010; 19: 1373–1380.
21.
HuntO., BurdenD., HepperP., JohnstonC.The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review.Eur J Orthod.2005; 27: 274–285.
22.
JanghorbanR., RoudsariR.L., TaghipourA.Skype interviewing: the next generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research.Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being.2014; 9.
23.
KramerF-J, BaethgeC., SinikovicB., SchliephakeH.An analysis of quality of life in 130 families having small children with cleft lip/palate using the impact on family scale.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2007; 36: 1146–1152.
24.
KramerF-J, GruberR., FialkaF., SinikovicB., HahnW., SchliephakeH.Quality of life in school-age children with orofacial clefts and their families.J Craniofac Surg.2009; 20: 2061–2066.
25.
LahteenmakiP.M., SjoblomJ., KorhonenT., SalmiT.T.The siblings of childhood cancer patients need early support: a follow-up study over the first year.Arch Dis Child.2004; 89: 1008–1013.
26.
LambM.E., Sutton-SmithB.Family and Relationships.Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press;2014.
27.
LobatoD.J.Siblings of handicapped children: a review.J Autism Dev Disord.1983; 13: 347–364.
28.
LobatoD.J., KaoB.T.Brief report: family-based group intervention for young siblings of children with chronic illness and developmental disability.J Pediatr Psychol.2005; 30: 678–682.
29.
MorseJ.M., RichardsL.Read Me First for a User's Guide to Qualitative Methods.London: Sage;2002.
30.
NelsonP.A.Qualitative approaches in craniofacial research.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009; 46: 245–251.
31.
NelsonP.A., KirkS., CaressA-L, GlennyA-M. Parents' experiences of caring for a child with a cleft lip and/or palate: a review of the literature.Child: Care, Health Dev.2012; 38: 6–20.
32.
Office for National Statistics.Family Size. Working report. London: Office for National Statistics; 2013.
33.
PhillipsC., RumseyN.Considerations for the provision of psychosocial services for families following paediatric burn injury: a quantitative study.Burns.2008; 34: 56–62.
34.
PinquartM.Do the parent-child relationship and parenting behaviours differ between families with a child with and without chronic illness?J Pediatr Psychol.2013; 38: 708–721.
35.
PrchalA., LandoltM.A.Psychological interventions with siblings of pediatric cancer patients: a systematic review.Psychooncology.2009; 18: 1241–1251.
36.
SargentJ.R., SahlerO.J., RoghmannK.J., MulhernR.K., BarbarianO.A., CarpenterP.J., CopelandD.R., DolginM.J., ZeltzerL.K.Sibling adaptation to childhood cancer collaborative study: siblings' perceptions of the cancer experience.J Pediatr Psychol.1995; 20: 151–164.
37.
SharpeD., RossiterL.Siblings of children with a chronic illness: a meta-analysis.J Pediatr Psychol.2002; 27: 699–710.
38.
ShiversC.M., PlavnickJ.B.Sibling involvement in interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review.J Autism Dev Disord.2015; 45: 685–696.
39.
SloperP.Experiences and support needs of siblings of children with cancer.Health Soc Care Community.2000; 8: 298–306.
40.
SmolakL.Body image in children and adolescents: where do we go from here?Body Image.2004; 1: 15–28.
41.
StockN.M., FeragenK.B., RumseyN.Adults' narratives of growing up with a cleft lip and/or palate: factors associated with psychological adjustment.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. In press.
42.
StockN.M., RumseyN.Parenting a child with a cleft: the father's perspective.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2015; 52: 31–43.
43.
StonemanK., StockN.M., CunniffeC., MartindaleA., RumseyN.CLAPA Regional Coordinators Project Evaluation Report: focus group studies in the Central UK region.Bristol, UK: Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England;2014.
44.
U.S. Census Bureau.Changes in the Lives of U.S. Children: 1990-2000. Working report by the U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2005.
45.
VermaesI.P.R., van SusanteA.M.J., van BakelH.J.A.Psychological functioning of siblings in families of children with chronic health conditions: a meta-analysis.J Pediatr Psychol.2012; 37: 166–184.
46.
WhitemanS.D., McHaleS.M., SoliA.Theoretical perspectives on sibling relationships.J Fam Theory Rev.2011; 3: 124–139.
47.
WilliamsP.D.Siblings and pediatric chronic illness: a review of the literature.Int J Nurs Studies.1997; 34: 312–323.
