Foot drop patients depend on ankle-foot orthosis (AFOs) for locomotion; however, conventional AFOs often lack adequate ankle range of motion (ROM) due to their rigidity.
Objective
This study aims to develop a robotic ankle-foot orthosis (RAFO) equipped with a hybrid actuator (HA) and evaluate its ROM through a bench test method using a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) and an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS).
Methods
A commercially available AFO was adopted, and its dimensions were used to develop an RAFO with HA using SolidWorks. The FLC was considered for this analysis due to its ability to handle uncertainty and imprecision models effectively. The FLC’s input and output membership function variables are defined based on preliminary experimental readings of the Plantarflexion/Dorsiflexion (PF/DF) motion and actuator displacements. The Mamdani rule-based FLC model was developed using thirty-six rules to control the RAFO motion. The FLC dataset was then implemented to train the ANFIS controller for 1000 epochs using the Takagi-Sugeno model with a hybrid learning approach. ANFIS, with its neural network-based learning capability, was implemented to achieve higher uniform ROM.
Results
The FLC generated a non-uniform ROM of 29.7° (13.9° PF, 15.8° DF) owing to rule-based input. In contrast, the ANFIS achieved a uniform and higher ROM of 30.4° (16.8° PF, 13.6° DF) by integrating neural network learning with fuzzy logic reasoning.
Conclusion
The RAFO with an ANFIS controller provided a 2.3% higher uniform ROM than the FLC and also adapts for varying walking conditions. This HA-based assistive device can improve rehabilitation outcomes and mobility of patients with foot drop.
BlayaJAHerrH. Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait. IEEE Trans Neu Sys Rehab Engine2004; 12(1): 24–31.
4.
DíazIGilJJSánchezELower-limb robotic rehabilitation: literature review and challenges. J Robot2011; 2011(1), 1–11.
5.
MohammedSAmiratYRifaiH. Lower-limb movement assistance through wearable robots: state of the art and challenges. Adv Robot2012; 26(1-2): 1–22.
6.
ShaoYZhangWSuY, et al.Design and optimization of load-adaptive actuator with variable stiffness for compact ankle exoskeleton. Mech Mach Theor2021; 161: 104323.
7.
ZhangCZhuYFanJ, et al.Design of a quasi-passive 3 DOFs ankle-foot wearable rehabilitation orthosis. Bio Med Mater Eng2015; 26: S647–S654.
8.
AwadMIGanDAzzu’biA, et al.Novel passive discrete variable stiffness joint: modeling, design, and characterization. In: Proceedings. IEEE International Conference Robot Biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE, 2016, pp. 1808–1813.
9.
HassanMYagiKKadoneH, et al.Optimized design of a variable viscosity link for robotic AFO. In: Proceedings 41st Annual International Conference IEEE Engineering Medicine Biology Society. EMBC, 2019, pp. 6220–6223.
10.
ShahBMcNallyDPatelK, et al.Design and fabrication of an intuitive leg assist device to address lower extremity weakness. In: Proceedings IEEE 37th Annual Northeast Bio Engineering Conference (NEBEC). IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–2.
11.
AboamerMAMohamedNARAlrashideB. Low-cost electromechanical bionic model for foot drop gait disability. In: Proceedings 2nd International Conference Computer Informatics Science. ICCIS, 2020, pp. 1–3.
12.
Font LlagunesJMLugrísUClosD, et al.Design, control, and pilot study of a lightweight and modular robotic exoskeleton for walking assistance after spinal cord injury. J Mech Robot2020; 12(3): 031008.
13.
ShorterKALiYMorrisEA, et al.Experimental evaluation of a portable powered ankle-foot orthosis. In: Proceedings Annual International Conference IEEE Engineering Medicine Biology Society. EMBS, 2011, pp. 624–627.
14.
UlkirOAkgunGKaplanogluE. Mechanical design and analysis of a pneumatic ankle foot orthosis. In: International: Proceedings Electrical Electronics Computer Science Biomedical Engineering Meeting (EBBT). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–4.
15.
HongJ-CSuzukiSFukushimaY, et al.Development of high-dorsiflexion assistive robotic technology for gait rehabilitation. In: Proceedings IEEE International Conference System Man Cyber (SMC). IEEE, 2018, pp. 3801–3806.
16.
KimSJNaYLeeDY, et al.Pneumatic AFO powered by a miniature custom compressor for drop foot correction. IEEE Trans Neur Sys Rehab Engine2020; 28(8): 1781–1789.
17.
SalmeronLJJucaGVMahadeoSM, et al.An untethered electro-pneumatic exosuit for gait assistance of people with foot drop. Frontiers Bio Dev2020; 83549: V001T09A009.
18.
ThalmanCMHertzellTLeeH. Toward a soft robotic ankle-foot orthosis (SR-AFO) exosuit for human locomotion: preliminary results in late stance plantarflexion assistance. In: Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference Soft Robot (RoboSoft). IEEE, 2020, pp. 801–807.
19.
MurphyPAdolfGDalyS, et al.Test of a customized compliant ankle rehabilitation device in unpowered mode. In: Proceedings 36th Annual International Conference IEEE Engineering Medicine Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 2014, pp. 3057–3060.
20.
ParkY-LChenB-RPérez-ArancibiaNO, et al.Design and control of a bio-inspired soft wearable robotic device for ankle-foot rehabilitation. Bioinspiration Biomimetics2014; 9(1): 016007.
21.
KwonJParkJ-HKuS, et al.A soft wearable robotic ankle-foot-orthosis for post-stroke patients. IEEE Rob Autom Lett2019; 4(3): 2547–2552.
22.
XiaHKwonJPathakP, et al.Design of a multi-functional soft ankle exoskeleton for foot-drop prevention, propulsion assistance, and inversion/eversion stabilization. In: Proceedings 8th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference Biomed Robot Biomechatronics. IEEE, 2020, pp. 118–123.
23.
MancholaMSerranoDGómezD, et al.T-FLEX: variable stiffness ankle-foot orthosis for gait assistance. International: Proc Int Symp Wearable Robot Biosys Biorob2019; 22: 160–164.
24.
PolinkovskyABachmannRJKernNI, et al.An ankle foot orthosis with insertion point eccentricity control. In: Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots Systems. IEEE,2012, pp. 1603–1608.
25.
RossiSPatanèFSetteFD, et al.WAKE-Up: a wearable ankle knee exoskeleton. In: Proceedings 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robot Biomechatronics. IEEE, 2014, pp. 504–507.
26.
MoltedoMBačekTLangloisK, et al.Design and experimental evaluation of a lightweight, high-torque and compliant actuator for an active ankle foot orthosis. In: International: Proceedings International Conference on Rehabilitation Robot (ICORR). IEEE, 2017, pp. 283–288.
27.
MoltedoMCavalloGBačekT, et al.Variable stiffness ankle actuator for use in robotic-assisted walking: control strategy and experimental characterization. Mech Mach Theor2019; 134: 604–624.
28.
ChenBZiBWangZ, et al.Development of robotic ankle-foot orthosis with series elastic actuator and magneto-rheological brake. J Mech Robot2021; 13(1): 011002.
29.
GuGMKormushevPCaldwellDG. Fabrication of ankle foot orthosis using shape memory alloys to restore foot dorsiflexion. In: International: Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robot and Automation (ICRA), IEEE. 2013: 4537–4542.
30.
LouieDREngJJ. Powered ankle-dorsiflexion assistance to improve gait in individuals with stroke: a systematic review of technology and rehabilitation strategies. J NeuroEng Rehabil2016; 13: 69.
31.
RodriguezKde GrootJBaasF, et al.Passive ankle joint stiffness compensation by a novel ankle-foot-orthosis. In: International: Proceedings 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robot Biomechatronics (Biorob). IEEE, 2018, pp. 517–522.
32.
YuHHuangSThakorNV, et al.A novel compact compliant actuator design for rehabilitation robots. In: Proceedings IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robot (ICORR). IEEE, 2013, pp. 1–6.
33.
ShumanTotahDGatesDH, et al.Comparison of five different methodologies for evaluating ankle–foot orthosis stiffness. J NeuroEng Rehabil2023; 20: 11.
34.
ThepsatomlPNumsomranATipsuwanpoMV, et al.DC motor speed control using fuzzy logic based on LabVIEW. In: SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference 2006, 18–21 October 2006, Busan, Korea.
35.
AliFHAlrazaaqSNA. Fuzzy self-tuning of DC position control based on LabVIEW. Al Rafidian Engineering2009; 17(4): 154.
36.
abd altayefJxiongZHUQ. Real time DC motor control by (FPID) Controllers and design (FLC) Using Lab VIEW software simulation. In: 2nd International conference on Computer and Automation Engineering, ICCAE. IEEE Publications, 2010, vol 2, pp. 417–420.
37.
HusseinMM. Design and Implementation of a Fuzzy Controller for Small Rotation Angles 1st International Conference on Energy, Power and Control., College of Engineering. University of Basrah, Iraq, 2010. Nov 30-Dec 2.
38.
Bolu AjiboyeAWeirRFFF. A heuristic fuzzy logic approach to EMG pattern recognition for multichannel prosthesis control. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2005; 13(3), 280.
39.
HidalgoMTeneGSanchezA. Fuzzy control of a robotic arm using EMG Signals. In: International Conference on Industrial Electronics and Control Applications, (ICIECA). ISBN 0-7803-9419-4, 2005.
40.
YangYYangCLeeKM. Model based Fuzzy Adaptation for control of a lower extremity rehabilitation exoskeleton. In: IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Singapore, 14–17 July 2009.
41.
AdiputraDMazlanSAZamzuriH, et al.Fuzzy logic controller for current induced ankle foot orthoses based on electromyography biosignal and ankle angle. Journal of Advanced Vehicle System2016; 1(1): 28–40.
42.
GowrishankarGArockia SelvakumarAA. Evaluation of robotic ankle-foot orthosis with different actuators using Simscape multibody for foot-drop patients. Int J Online Biomed Eng (iJOE)2023; 19(10): 156–168.
43.
JiangTDurfeeW. Bench testing of a tunable ankle-foot orthosis with adjustable stiffness and neutral angle. In: Proceedings of the 2023 Design of Medical Devices Conference. Minneapolis, MN, USA, 17–19 Apr 2023, ASME.
44.
KochharRKanthiMMakkarRK. Neuro-fuzzy controller for active ankle foot orthosis. Perspect Sci (Neth)2016; 8: 293–297.
