We aimed to determine the effect of Hypnobirthing training on fear of childbirth (FOC), birth pain, birth satisfaction and birth outcomes. This randomized controlled trial study was conducted with 80 nulliparous pregnant who were divided into two groups (experimental group n = 40 and control n = 40) in a maternity hospital. The couples received the training in groups(4 weeks, once a week, 3-hour, group session). The mean score of hypnobirthing group for the whole Wijma Birth Expectancy/Experience Scale was significantly lower than that of the routine care group (p < .001).In the latent, active, and transitional phases of labor, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)scores of the experimental groups were found to be significantly lower than those of the control group (p < .001).The experimental group’s rates of birth intervention were significantly lower and their deliveries period were shorter, than those that of the routine control group (p < .001).In addition, the vaginal delivery rates (p = .037)and the scores for the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) were also found to be higher than those of the control group (p < .001).
AshagrieH. E.FentieD. Y.KassahunH. G. (2020). A review article on epidural analgesia for labor pain management: A systematic review. International Journal of Surgery Open, 24, 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2020.04.007
2.
AtisF. Y.RathfischG. (2018). The effect of hypnobirthing training given in the antenatal period on birth pain and Fear. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 33, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.08.004
3.
Balcik ColakM.Ozturk CanH. (2021). Effects of the time of pregnant women’s admission to the labor ward on the labor process and interventions. Health Care for Women International, 42, 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2020.1716763
4.
BolsoyN.NursevenH. (2019). Doğum Korkusu Yaşayan Kadınlarda Psiko - Eğitim Obstetrik ve Maternal Sonuçları İyileştirir Mi?Sistematik İnceleme, 12(1), 82–90.
5.
Bozİ.AkgünM.DumanF. (2021). A feasibility study of a psychoeducation intervention based on human caring theory in nulliparous women with fear of childbirth. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 42, 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482x.2020.1752173
6.
BuranG.OlgaçZ.KaraçamZ. (2020). The Effects Of Childbırth Education Classes On Women’s Birth Method. Fear And Experience: Systematic Review, 15(4), 41–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2020.15.3.4B0034
7.
BülezA.Çeber TurfanE.SoğukpınarN. (2018). Evaluation of the effect of hypnobirthing education during antenatal period on fear of childbirth. The European Research Journal, 5(2), 350–354. https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.371102
8.
ÇankayaS.ŞimşekB. (2021). Effects of antenatal education on fear of birth, depression, anxiety, childbirth self-efficacy, and mode of delivery in primiparous pregnant women: A prospective randomized controlled study. Clinical Nursing Research, 30(6), 818–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773820916984
9.
EideK. T.MorkenN. H.BærøeK. (2019). Maternal reasons for requesting planned Cesarean section in Norway: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2250-6
10.
FenwickJ.ToohillJ.CreedyD. K.SmithJ.GambleJ. (2015). Sources, responses and moderators of childbirth fear in Australian women: A qualitative investigation. Midwifery, 31, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.003
11.
FerolinS. K.MasudaC.SmithC.MatsuiM. (2020). Evidence-based intrapartum practice and its associated factors at a tertiary teaching hospital in the Philippines, a descriptive mixed-methods study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2778-5
12.
Göncü SerhatlıoğluS.KarahanN.Hollins MartinC. J.MartinC. R. (2018). Construct and content validity of the Turkish Birth Satisfaction Scale – Revised (T-BSS-R). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 36(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1443322
13.
HodnettE. D.GatesS.HofmeyrG. J.SakalaC. (2013). Continuous support for women during childbirth. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 16, 117. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5
14.
KaraahmetA. Y.YazıcıS. (2017). The current stage of episiotomy. Journal of Health Sciences and Professions, 4(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.270072
15.
KaraçamZ.Kurnaz ArslanD.GüneşG. (2017). Evaluating the content and quality of intrapartum care in vaginal births: An example of a state hospital. Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology, 14(1) 10–17. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.88123
16.
KhamehchianM.Adib-HajbagheryM.HeydariKhayatN.RezaeiM.SaberyM. (2020). Primiparous women’s experiences of normal vaginal delivery in Iran: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20(1), 259. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02954-4
17.
KobayashiS.HanadaN.MatsuzakiM.TakeharaK.OtaE.SasakiH.NagataC.MoriR. (2017). Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4(4), CD011516. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011516.pub2
18.
KorukcuO.BulutO.KukuluK. (2016). Psychometric evaluation of the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire version B. Health Care for Women International, 37, 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2014.943838
19.
KorukcuO.KukuluK.FiratM. Z. (2012). The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire (W-DEQ) with pregnant women. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 19, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01694.x
20.
LeeL. Y. K.HolroydE. (2009). Evaluating the effect of childbirth education class: A mixed-method study. International Nursing Review, 56, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00701.x
21.
LemmensS. M. P.van MontfortP.MeertensL. J. E.SpaandermanM. E. A.SmitsL. J. M.de VriesR. G.ScheepersH. C. J. (2021). Perinatal factors related to pregnancy and childbirth satisfaction: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 42, 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482x.2019.1708894
22.
MartinC. J. H.MartinC. R. (2014). Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery, 30(6), 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006
23.
MenhartL.ProsenM. (2017). Womens satisfaction with the childbirth experience: A descriptive research. Obzornik Zdravstvene Nege, 51(4), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2017.51.4.189
24.
MirzakhaniK.KarimiF. Z.MohamadzadehVatanchiA.Feroz ZaidiF. (2020). The effect of maternal position on maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, 8(1), 1988–2004. https://doi.org/10.22038/jmrh.2019.38133.1423
25.
MonganM. F. (2019). HypnoBirthing Mongan Yöntemi (9.bask.). In ÇokerH.BakkalA. (Eds.), HypnoBirhing (pp. 23–102). Gün Yayıncılık.
26.
MortazaviF.AgahJ. (2018). Childbirth fear and associated factors in a sample of pregnant Iranian women. Oman Medical Journal, 33(6), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2018.91
27.
NursalamN.PradanieR.TrisnadewiI. A. (2008). Hypnobirthing increase pain tolerance and anxiety in active phase labor. Jurnal NERS, 3(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v3i1.4981
28.
O'ConnellM. A.Leahy-WarrenP.KhashanA. S.KennyL. C.O'NeillS. M. (2017). Worldwide prevalence of tocophobia in pregnant women: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 96(8), 907–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13138
Phillips -MooreJ. (2012). Birthing outcomes from an Australian HypnoBirthing programme. British Journal of Midwifery, 20(8), 558–564. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.558
32.
PoggiL.GoutaudierN.SéjournéN.ChabrolH. (2018). When fear of childbirth is pathological: The fear continuum. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 22, 772–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2447-8
33.
RichensY.SmithD. M.LavenderD. T. (2018). Fear of birth in clinical practice: A structured review of current measurement tools. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 16, 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.02.010
SluijsA. M.WijmaK.CleirenM. P. H. D.van LithJ. M. M.WijmaB. (2020). Preferred and actual mode of delivery in relation to fear of childbirth. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 41(4), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482x.2019.1708319
36.
SwencionisC.RendellS. L.DolceK.MassryS.MonganM. (2012). Outcomes of HypnoBirthing. Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology & Health, 27(2), 120.
37.
TabibM.HumphreyT.Forbes-McKayK.LauA. (2021). Expectant parents’ perspectives on the influence of a single antenatal relaxation class: A qualitative study. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 43, 101341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101341
UludağE.MeteS. (2021). The effect of nursing care provided based on the philosophy of hypnobirthing on fear, pain, duration, satisfaction and cost of labor: A single-blind randomized controlled study. Health Care for Women International, 42, 678–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2020.1835916
40.
WewersM. E.LoweN. K. (1990). A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursing & Health, 13(4), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770130405
WijmaK.WijmaB.ZarM. (1998). Psychometric aspects of the W-DEQ; a new questionnaire for the measurement of fear of childbirth. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 19, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674829809048501
