Even though they are conscious, patients who are unable to speak while connected to a mechanical ventilator have serious difficulties in communicating with healthcare staff. This research aimed to determine the effectiveness for patients of a computer-based communication tool (CBCT) and to compare these results with patients using a routine method. This quasi-experimental study was conducted with 90 intubated patients. It was found that 20.0% of the patients using CBCT stated that they had difficulties in communicating, while this rate was 82.2% among patients not using CBCT. Compared with participants in the control group, experimental group patients reported a lower median score for the anxiety levels (23.0 [20.0–39.0], 29.0 [20.0–57.00], p < .001) and higher mean comfort levels (130.2 ± 9.0, 109.6 ± 13.3, p < .001). Positive impacts of the CBCT are its suitability for patients who are dependent upon ventilation for different reasons and their improved ability to communicate effectively.
BagchiA.RudolphM.EikermannM. (2018). Mechanical ventilation mode and postoperative pulmonary complications – a reply. Anaesthesia, 73, 253–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14204
2.
BaumgartenM.PoulsenI. (2015). Patients’ experiences of being mechanically ventilated in an ICU: A qualitative metasynthesis. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 29, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12177
3.
CarrollS. M. (2007). Silent, slow lifeworld: The communication experience of nonvocal ventilated patients. Qualitative Health Research, 17(9), 1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307307334
4.
CoelhoA.ParolaV.SandgrenA.FernandesO.KolcabaK.ApóstoloJ. (2018). The effects of guided imagery on comfort in palliative care. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing, 20(4), 392–399. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000000460
5.
DehzangiO.FarooqM. (2018). Portable brain-computer interface for the intensive care unit patient communication using subject-dependant SSVEP identification. BioMed Research International, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9796238
6.
El-SoussiA. H.ElshafeyM. M.OthmanS. Y.Abd-ElkaderF. A. (2015). Augmented alternative communication methods in intubated COPD patients: Does it make difference. Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis, 64(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcdt.2014.07.006
7.
EngstromA.NystromN.SundelinG.RattrayJ. (2013). People’s experiences of being mechanically ventilated in an ICU: A qualitative study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 29, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2012.07.003
8.
FinkeE. H.LightJ.KitkoL. (2008). A systematic review of the effectiveness of nurse communication with patients with complex communication needs with a focus on the use of augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(16), 2102–2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02373.x
9.
Freeman-SandersonA.MorrisK.ElkinsM. (2019). Characteristics of patient communication and prevalence of communication difficulty in the intensive care unit: An observational study. Australian Critical Care, 32(5), 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2018.09.002
GrossbachI.StranbergS.ChlanL. (2011). Promoting effective communication for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Critical Care Nurse, 31, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2010728
12.
GuttormsonJ. L.BremerK. L.JonesR. M. (2015). “Not being able to talk was horrid”: A descriptive, correlational study of communication during mechanical ventilation. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 31, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2014.10.007
13.
HappM. B.GarrettK.ThomasD. D.TateJ.GeorgeE.HouzeM.RadtkeJ.SereikaS. (2011). Nurse-patient communication interactions in the intensive care unit. American Journal of Critical Care, 20(2), e28–e40. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2011433
14.
HappM. B.RoeschT. K.GarrettK. (2004). Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: A feasibility study. Heart & Lung, 33, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2003.12.005
15.
HappM. B.RoeschT. K.KaganS. H. (2005). Patient communication following head and neck cancer surgery: A pilot study using electronic speech-generating devices. Oncology Nursing Forum, 32(6), 1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1188/05.ONF.1179-1187
16.
HappM. B.Von VisgerT.WeberM. L.VermillionB.ChippsE.TraughberB.PatakL. (2016). Iterative development, usability, and acceptability testing of a communication app for mechanically ventilated patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 193, A1096.
17.
HofhuisJ. G.SpronkP. E.van StelH. F.SchrijversA. J.RommesJ. H.BakkerJ. (2008). Experiences of critically ill patients in the ICU. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 24, 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2008.03.004
18.
HolmA.DreyerP. (2018). Use of communication tools for mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 36(8), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000449
19.
HosseiniS. R.Valizad-HasanloeiM. A.FeiziA. (2018). The effect of using communication boards on ease of communication and anxiety in mechanically ventilated conscious patients admitted to intensive care units. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 23(5), 358–362. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_68_17
20.
KarlssonV.BergbomI.ForsbergA. (2012). The lived experiences of adult intensive care patients who were conscious during mechanical ventilation: A phenomenological-hermeneutic study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 28, 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2011.11.002
21.
KhalailaR.ZbidatW.AnwarK.BayyaA.LintonD. M.SviriS. (2011). Communication difficulties and psychoemotional distress in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. American Journal of Critical Care, 20(6), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2011989
MartinhoC. I.RodriguesI. T. (2016). Communication of mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units. Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 28, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20160027
24.
MigliettaM. A.BochicchioG.ScaleaT. M. (2004). Computer-assisted communication for critically ill patients: A pilot study. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 57, 488–493. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000141025.67192.d9
25.
NilsenM.SereikaS. M.HoffmanL. A.BarnatoA.DonovanH.HappM. B. (2014). Nurse and patient interaction behaviours effects on nursing care quality for mechanically ventilated, older adults in the ICU. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 7(3), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20140127-02
26.
OnerN. (2012). Psychological tests used in Turkey: A reference guide. Bogazici University Publishing.
27.
OtuzogluM.KarahanA. (2014). Determining the effectiveness of illustrated communication material for communication with intubated patients at an intensive care unit. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 20, 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12190
28.
ParkS.NaS. H.OhJ.LeeJ. S.OhS. T.KimJ. J.ParkJ. Y. (2018). Pain and anxiety and their relationship with medication doses in the intensive care unit. Journal of Critical Care, 47, 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.05.014
29.
PatakL.GawlinskiA.FungN.I.DoeringL.BergJ.HennemanE. A. (2006). Communication boards in critical care: Patients’ views. Applied Nursing Research, 19, 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2005.09.006
30.
RadtkeJ. V.TateJ. A.HappM. B. (2012). Nurses’ perceptions of communication training in the ICU. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 28, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2011.11.005
31.
RodriguezC. S.RoweM.KoeppelB.ThomasL.TrocheM. S.PaguioG. (2012). Development of a communication intervention to assist hospitalized suddenly speechless patients. Technology and Health Care, 20(6), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-2012-0695
32.
RustamJ. S.KongsuwanW.KitrungroteL. (2018). Comfort in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: A literature review. Journal for the Critical Care Nurse, 11(2), e64159. https://doi.org/10.5812/ccn.64159
33.
SooJ.AldridgeS.FrenchJ.MitchellA. (2008). Development of dual language information cards as a tool for communication between radiation therapists and Cantonese-speaking patients undergoing radiation treatments for head-and-neck cancer. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 39, 16–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2008.01.003
34.
SpielbergerC. D.Gonzalez-ReigosaF.Martinez-UrrutiaA.NatalicioL. F.NatalicioD. S. (1971). Development of the Spanish edition of the state-trait anxiety inventory. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 5, 145–158.
35.
TemboA. C.HigginsI.ParkerV. (2015). The experience of communication difficulties in critically ill patients in and beyond intensive care: Findings from a larger phenomenological study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 31, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2014.10.004.
36.
TolottiA.BagnascoA.CataniaG.AleoG.PagnucciN.CadorinL.ZaniniM.RoccoG.StievanoA.CarnevaleF. A.SassoL. (2018). The communication experience of tracheostomy patients with nurses in the intensive care unit: A phenomenological study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 46, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2018.01.001
37.
UstundagH.AslanE. F. (2010). The Turkish adaptation of perianesthesia comfort questionnaire. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2(2), 94–99.
38.
Von VisgerT. T.TateJ. A.TraughberB.PatakL.HappM. B. (2016). ICU nurses focus group on acceptability testing of Vidatalk™. American Thoracic Society, 193, A7592.
39.
WilsonL.KolcabaK. (2004). Practical application of comfort theory in the perianesthesia setting. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 19(3), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2004.03.006
40.
YamanA. Y.NagórskaM.KarabulutN. (2017). Problems in critical care nurse patient communication: Examples of Poland and Turkey. Acta Clinica Croatica, 56(3), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2017.56.03.10
41.
YavuzM. E.GursoyA. (2017). Patient communication following laryngectomy: A pilot study using visual communication guide. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing, 4, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27989.32484
42.
ZagaC. Z.BerneyS.VogelA. P. (2019). The feasibility, utility, and safety of communication interventions with mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(3), 1335–1355. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0001
