This study compares the effect of a daily gauze dressing with that of a lipidocolloid dressing on the time taken to make up the dressing and efficacy of the management of traumatic digitalwounds. This is a randomized controlled trial of 28 patients (16 experimental and 12 control) with injuries to their fingers and loss of tissue. The patients in the experimental and control groups were given a lipido-colloid dressing and a daily gauze dressing, respectively. The patients'wounds were assessed in terms of the size of thewound and the time it took for thewound to heal. The findings showed that patients in the experimental group had a faster recovery time from the healing of their wound than the control group (p= .024). The findings can help to establish an evidence-based practice in the management of traumatic digital wounds in clinical settings.
Benbow, M. (2002). Product focus. Urgotul: Alternative to conventional non-adherence dressings. British Journal of Nursing, 11(2), 135-138.
2.
Butcher, M. (1999). Asystematic approach to complexwounds. Nursing Standard, 13(29), 58-64.
3.
Collier, M. (1999). The principles of optimum wound management. Nursing Standard, 10(43), 47-54.
4.
Collier, M., & Hollonworth, H. (2000). Pain and tissue trauma during dressing change. Nursing Standard, 14(40), 71-73.
5.
Cruse, P. J. E., & Foord, R. (1973). A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Archives of Surgery, 107, 206-209.
6.
Dawson, C., Catlin, A., Bussey, C., Silverman, W. A., & Carter, B. S. (1992). Use of calcium alginate to pack abscess cavities: A controlled clinical trial. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons, 37(3), 177-179.
7.
Dealey, C. (1991). Measuring a wound. Nursing, 4(33), 29-29.
8.
Eaglstein, W. H.,& Falanga, V. (1997). Chronicwounds. Surgical Clinics of North America, 77, 689-700.
9.
Edwards, J. (2002). Urgotul: Product focus. Journal of Community Nursing, 16(4), 37-40.
10.
Flanagan, M. (1997). Wound management. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone.
11.
Fowler, A. B. (1999). Chapter 6 in M. Miller & D. Glower (Eds.), Wound management: Theory and practice(pp. 321-376). London: Nursing Times Books.
12.
Fox, J. W., Golden, G. T., Rodeheaver, G., Edgerton, M. T.,& Edlich, R. F. (1977). Nonoperative management of fingertip pulp amputation by occlusive dressings. American Journal of Surgery, 133(2), 255-256.
13.
Griffiths, G. (1991). Choosing a dressing. Nursing Times, 87(36), 84-90.
14.
Hollander, J. E., & Singer, A. J. (1999). Laceration management. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 34(3), 356-367.
15.
Hollonworth, H. (2000). Pain and wound care. Wound Care Society Educational Leaflet, 7(2), 1-2.
16.
Honward, J. M., Barker, W. F., Culbertson, W. R., & Edgerton, M. T. (1964). Post-operative wound inflection: The influence of ultra-violet radiation of the operating rooms and various other factors. Annals of Surgery, 160, 32-80.
17.
James, H. (1994). Wound dressings in accident and emergency departments. Accident and Emergency Nursing, 2, 87-93.
18.
Jones, V., & Milton, T. (2000). When and how to use hydrocolloid dressings. Nursing Times Plus, 96(4), 5-7.
19.
Lait, M. E.,& Smith, L. N. (1998). Wound management: A literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7(1), 11-17.
20.
Latarjet, J. (2002). The management of pain associated with dressing changes in patients with burns. Available from www.worldwidewounds.com/2002/november/latarjet/burn-pain-atdressingchanges.html
21.
Law, S. M. (2002). The development of standardized wound assessment form to be used in Hong Kong. Unpublished master's thesis, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
22.
Laverty, D. (1997). Protocols and guidelines for managing wounds. Professional Nurse, 13(2), 79-81.
23.
Meaume, S., Senet, P., Dumas, R., Carsin, H., Pannier, M.,& Bohbot, S. (2002). Urgotul: A novel non-adherent lipidocolloid dressing. British Journal of Nursing, 11(16 Suppl.), S42-S50.
24.
Mennen, U., & Wiese, A. (1993). Fingertip injuries management with semi-occlusive. Journal of Hand Surgery, 18(4), 416-422.
25.
Morison, M. (1987, July). Wound assessment. Professional Nursing, 4, 315-317.
26.
nQuery Advisor. (2001). Statistical solutions. Belfast, North Ireland: Statistical Solutions.
27.
Pannier, P. (1999). Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerance of Urgotul dressing in the treatment of losses of substance both acute and chronic. Dijon, France: Urgo Laboratories.
28.
Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice(2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall Health.
29.
Sawyer, R. G., & Pruett, T. L. (1994). Wound infections. Surgical Clinics of North America, 74(3), 519-536.
30.
Seiler, W. O., & Stahelin, H. B. (1994). Identification of factors that impair wound healing: A possible approach to wound healing research. Wound, 6(3), 101-106.
31.
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3), 591-611.
32.
SPSS 11.5. (2001). SPSS advanced models. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
33.
Thomas, S. (1991). Wound management and dressing. London: Pharmaceutical Press.
34.
Thomas, S. (1997a). A comparative study of the properties of twelve hydrocolloid dressings. Available at www.worldwidewounds.com/1997/july/thomas-hydronet/hydronet.html
35.
Thomas, S. (1997b). A structured approach to the selection of dressings. Available at www.worldwidewounds.com/1997/july/thomas-guide/dress-select.html
36.
Turner, T. (1985). Which dressing and why. In S. Westaby (Ed.), Wound care(pp. 234-256). London: Heinemann Medical Books.
Voinchet, V., Lambert, F., Kern, J., & Vasseur, P. (1991, July 13-15). Urgotul in plastic surgery: Use of the novel dressing in healing at graft and donor recipient sites. Poster presented at the 5th Congres des Plaies et Cicatrisation, Paris.
39.
Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L.,& Lenz, E. R. (1991). Measurement in nursing research(2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Davis.
40.
Williams, C. (1996). Painful dressings. Journal of Tissue Viability, 6(3), 69-70.
41.
Winter, G. (1962). Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the domestic pig. Nature, 193, 293-293.
