There are different approaches to breastfeeding interventions, but the global 6-month exclusive breastfeeding rates remain suboptimal. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought extra difficulties in promoting breastfeeding.
Research Aim:
To test the feasibility and effectiveness of a theory-based, real-time online educational and support program for breastfeeding related outcomes.
Methods:
An assessor-blinded, prospective pilot randomized controlled trial with parallel-group, repeated-measures design was used. The sample was low-risk primiparous mothers (N = 40) who delivered in the local public hospitals. Study outcomes consisted of exclusive breastfeeding rate, breastfeeding self-efficacy, and other breastfeeding outcomes measured by a self-reported questionnaire, including the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Comparisons between the differences in the intervention and control groups were carried out.
Results:
Thirteen participants in the intervention group successfully completed the program. They had a higher exclusive breastfeeding rate, breastfeeding self-efficacy, breastfeeding initiation rate, and longer exclusive breastfeeding duration than the control group. Additionally, the intervention group had a lower partial breastfeeding rate, and a higher maternal postnatal depression score and infant’s morbidity at postnatal 2 months. However, all the results were not statistically significant (p > .050). Overall, the intervention was highly valued by all participants who appreciated the regular postnatal follow-ups.
Conclusions:
Despite showing the satisfactory feasibility of the program, no significant improvements were found in all study outcomes. Considering the participants’ comments, we suggest refining and further testing the intervention with a larger sample size over a longer-term follow-up to confirm its effectiveness.
This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04741425)
Abbass-DickJ.SunW.NewportA.XieF.GodfreyD.GoodmanW. M. (2020). The comparison of access to an eHealth resource to current practice on mother and co-parent teamwork and breastfeeding rates: A randomized controlled trial. Midwifery, 90, Article 102812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102812
2.
AnsariS.AbediP.HasanpoorS.BaniS. (2014). The effect of interventional program on breastfeeding self-efficacy and duration of exclusive breastfeeding in pregnant women in Ahvaz, Iran. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014, Article 510793. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/510793
3.
ArabanM.KarimianZ.KakolakiZ. K.McQueenK. A.DennisC.-L. (2018). Randomized controlled trial of a prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy intervention in primiparous women in Iran. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 47(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2018.01.005
4.
AwaliyahS. N.RachmawatiI. N.RahmahH. (2019). Breastfeeding self-efficacy as a dominant factor affecting maternal breastfeeding satisfaction. BMC Nursing, 18(Suppl. 1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0359-6
5.
AzimiN.NasiriA. (2020). The effect of peer counseling on breastfeeding behavior of primiparous mothers: A randomized controlled field trial. Public Health Nursing, 37(3), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12692
ChanM. Y.IpW. Y.ChoiK. C. (2016). The effect of a self-efficacy-based educational programme on maternal breast feeding self-efficacy, breast feeding duration and exclusive breast feeding rates: A longitudinal study. Midwifery, 36, 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.003
10.
ChangP. C.LiS. F.YangH. Y.WangL. C.WengC. Y.ChenK. F.ChenW.FanS. Y. (2019). Factors associated with cessation of exclusive breastfeeding at 1 and 2 months postpartum in Taiwan. International Breastfeeding Journal, 14(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-019-0213-1
11.
ChavesA. F. L.XimenesL. B.RodriguesD. P.VasconcelosC. T. M.MonteiroJ. C. S.OriáM. O. B. (2019). Telephone intervention in the promotion of self-efficacy, duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding: Randomized controlled trial. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 27, e3140. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2777-3140
12.
ChristensenN.BruunS.SøndergaardJ.ChristesenH. T.FiskerN.ZachariassenG.SangildP. T.HusbyS. (2020). Breastfeeding and infections in early childhood: A cohort study. Pediatrics, 146(5), e20191892. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1892
13.
CooklinA. R.AmirL. H.NguyenC. D.BuckM. L.CullinaneM.FisherJ. R. W.DonathS. M. (2018). Physical health, breastfeeding problems and maternal mood in the early postpartum: A prospective cohort study. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 21(3), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-017-0805-y
14.
DanieleM. A.GanabaR.SarrassatS.CousensS.RossierC.DraboS.OuedraogoD.FilippiV. (2018). Involving male partners in maternity care in Burkina Faso: A randomized controlled trial. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 96(7), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.17.206466
15.
DaouD.TamimH.NabulsiM. (2020). Assessing the impact of professional lactation support frequency, duration and delivery form on exclusive breastfeeding in Lebanese mothers. PLoS ONE, 15(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238735
16.
DemirciJ. R.SuffolettoB.DomanJ.GlasserM.ChangJ. C.SereikaS. M.BogenD. L. (2020). The development and evaluation of a text message program to prevent perceived insufficient milk among first-time mothers: Retrospective analysis of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 8(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2196/17328
17.
DennisC.-L. (1999). Theoretical underpinnings of breastfeeding confidence: A self-efficacy framework. Journal of Human Lactation, 15(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/089033449901500303
DialloA. F.McGlothen-BellK.LucasR.WalshS.AllenC.HendersonW. A.CongX.McGrathJ. (2020). Feeding modes, duration, and diarrhea in infancy: Continued evidence of the protective effects of breastfeeding. Public Health Nursing, 37(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12683
FeenstraM. M.Jørgine KirkebyM.ThygesenM.DanbjørgD. B.KronborgH. (2018). Early breastfeeding problems: A mixed method study of mothers’ experiences. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, 16, 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.04.003
23.
ForsterD. A.McLardie-HoreF. E.McLachlanH. L.DaveyM.-A.GrimesH. A.DennisC.-L.MortensenK.MoorheadA. M.TawiaS.GoldL.ShafieiT.SmallR.EastC. E.AmirL. H. (2019). Proactive peer (mother-to-mother) breastfeeding support by telephone (ringing up About breastfeeding early [RUBY]): A multicentre, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine, 8, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.02.003
24.
FrankN. M.LynchK. F.UusitaloU.YangJ.LönnrotM.VirtanenS. M.HyötyH.NorrisJ. M. (2019). The relationship between breastfeeding and reported respiratory and gastrointestinal infection rates in young children. BMC Pediatrics, 19(1), 339. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1693-2
25.
GalipeauR.BaillotA.TrottierA.LemireL. (2018). Effectiveness of interventions on breastfeeding self-efficacy and perceived insufficient milk supply: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 14(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12607
26.
GianniL. M.BettinelliE. M.ManfraP.SoreentinoG.BezzeeE.PlevaniL.CavallaroG.RaffaeliG.CrippaL. B.ColomboL.MorniroliD.LiottoN.RoggeroP.VillamorE.MarchisioP.MoscaF. (2019). Breastfeeding difficulties and risk for early breastfeeding cessation. Nutrients, 11(2266), 1–10. http://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102266
27.
HamnerH. C.ChiangK. V.LiR. (2021). Returning to work and breastfeeding duration at 12 months, WIC infant and toddler feeding practices study-2. Breastfeeding Medicine, 16(12), 956–964. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2021.0081
28.
HaritonE.LocascioJ. J. (2018). Randomised controlled trials — The gold standard for effectiveness research. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 125(13), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15199
29.
HertzogM. A. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing and Health, 31, 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247
30.
IpW. Y.YeungL. S.ChoiK. C.ChairS. Y.DennisC. L. (2012). Translation and validation of the Hong Kong chinese version of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale–Short form. Research in Nursing and Health, 35(5), 450–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21493
31.
JiaoN.ZhuL.ChongY. S.ChanW. C. S.LuoN.WangW.HuR.ChanY. H.HeH. G. (2019). Web-based versus home-based postnatal psychoeducational interventions for first-time mothers: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 99, Article 103385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.07.002
32.
KellamsA. L.GurkaK. K.HornsbyP. P.DrakeE.ConawayM. R. (2018). A randomized trial of prenatal video education to improve breastfeeding among low-income women. Breastfeeding Medicine, 13(10), 666–673. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2018.0115
33.
KimJ. H.LeeS. W.LeeJ. E.HaE. K.HanM. Y.LeeE. (2021). Human milk feeding during the first 4 to 6 months of age and childhood disease burden until 10 years of age. Nutrients, 13(8), 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082825
34.
LeeD. T. S.YipS. K.ChiuH. F. K.LeungT. Y. S.ChanK. P. M.ChauI. O. L.LeungH. C. M.ChungT. K. H. (1998). Detecting postnatal depression in Chinese women: Validation of the Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172(5), 433–437. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.172.5.433
35.
LimC. Y.InJ. (2019). Randomization in clinical studies. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19049
36.
MuelbertM.GiuglianiE. R. J. (2018). Factors associated with the maintenance of breastfeeding for 6, 12, and 24 months in adolescent mothers. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5585-4
37.
PrasitwattanasereeP.SinsucksaiN.PrasopkittikunT.ViwatwongkasemC. (2019). Effectiveness of breastfeeding skills training and support program among first time mothers: A randomized control trial. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 23(3), 258–270.
38.
ShariatM.AbediniaN.NoorbalaA. A.ZebardastJ.MoradiS.ShahmohammadianN.KarimiA.AbbasiM. (2018). Breastfeeding self-efficacy as a predictor of exclusive breastfeeding: A clinical trial. Iranian Journal of Neonatology, 9(3), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijn.2018.24694.1316
39.
ShiraishiM.MatsuzakiM.KuriharaS.IwamotoM.ShimadaM. (2020). Stress response after breastfeeding and breastfeeding self-efficacy as modifiable predictors of exclusive breastfeeding at 3 months postpartum: a longitudinal study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03431-8
WongK. L.FongD. Y. T.LeeI. L. Y.ChuS.TarrantM. (2014). Antenatal education to increase exclusive breastfeeding: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 124(5), 961–968. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000481
45.
WongM. S.MouH.ChienW. T. (2021). Effectiveness of educational and supportive intervention for primiparous women on breastfeeding related outcomes and breastfeeding self-efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 117, Article 103874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103874
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
