In Their Grief,I Found Myself: Reconstructing a Researcher's Identity

Abstract

This paper offers an auto-ethnographic examination of the author's journey as a grief researcher, capturing how academic and personal identities have evolved through engagement with the emotional terrain of grief studies. Using auto-ethnography as both method and content, the paper draws exclusively from the author's experiences, journal entries and embodied reflections, rather than from secondary sources or participant data. Reflecting on experiences from the early days as a student to the current phase as a developing scholar, the study explores the ontological dimensions of learning, particularly the challenges and transformations involved in the researcher's role. Drawing on concepts of epistemological and ontological identity and view of writing as a mode of ‘knowing’, the author examines the ontological progression that emerges through grief research. Writing becomes a means of navigating ongoing ‘discursive struggles for identity’, offering insight into the evolving self within the present moment.

Keywords

grief researcher identity loss auto-ethnography scholar

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnett

(2000). Supercomplexity and the curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696156

Barnett

(2011). Learning about learning: A conundrum and a possible resolution. London Review of Education, 9(1). 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2011.550430

Bussu

Lalani

Pattison

Marshall

(2020). Engaging with care: Ethical issues in participatory research. Qualitative Research, 21(5), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120904883

Crossouard

Pryor

(2008). Becoming a researcher: A sociological perspective on assessment, learning and the construction of identity in a professional doctorate. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 16(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360802346614

Crotty

(1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process (6th ed.). Routledge, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003115700

Etherington

(2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher (2). Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 4(2), 46–46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238195734 https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140412331383963

Gadon

(2006). My life’s journey as researcher. Journal of Research Practice, 2(2), 1–9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238195734_My_Life's_Journey_as_Researcher

Gardner

(2008). Fitting the mold in graduate school: A qualitative study of socialisation in doctoral education. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9068-x

Gardner

(2010). Faculty perspectives on doctoral student socialisation in five disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Education, 5, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.28945/1310

10.

Hawley

(1993). Being bright is not enough: the unwritten rules of doctoral study. Charles C. Thomas Publisher.

11.

Maxwell

(2012). A realist approach to qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc.

12.

Richardson

(2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In Denzin

Lincoln

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 923–948). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

13.

Winnicott

D. W.

(1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development. International Universities Press.