Victims of Corruption Suffer Personal and Collective Loss: A Qualitative Study of Public Perceptions

Abstract

This study aimed to identify citizens’ perceptions of the effects of administrative corruption on their lives. Data were gathered using semi-structured interviews with 15 citizens living in Tehran, Iran, recruited through the convenience sampling method. Two main themes emerged from the data: Negative individual consequences (including “negative emotional consequences”, “negative motivational consequences”, “negative moral and behavioural consequences” and “negative economic consequences”) and Negative collective consequences (including “negative consequences related to family formation and stability” and “negative social consequences”). The study reveals that participants have experienced or perceived adverse effects in the personal, family and social spheres as a result of administrative corruption. The impacts of corruption on people's lives can be taken into consideration when explaining the importance and necessity of designing and implementing preventive measures and policies aimed at reducing corrupt behaviours in public agents.

Keywords

citizens consequences of corruption effects of corruption perception of official corruption public service

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersson

Heywood

P. M.

(2009). The politics of perception: Use and abuse of transparency international’s approach to measuring corruption. Political Studies, 57(4), 746–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00758.x

Bardhan

(2005). Scarcity, Conﬂicts, and Cooperation: Essays in the Political and Institutional Economics of Development. MIT Press.

Bauhr

Grimes

(2013). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12033

Björkman

(2007). Does money matter for student performance? Evidence from a grant program in Uganda. IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Budiman

Roan

Callan

(2013). Rationalizing ideologies, social identities and corruption among civil servants in Indonesia during the suharto era. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1451-y

Chandler

D. J.

Graham

L. J.

(2010). Relationship-oriented cultures, corruption, and international marketing success. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0152-7

Charron

Lapuente

Rothstein

(2013). Quality of government and corruption from a European perspective: A comparative study of good government in EU regions. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gallup Poll. (2020, 29 October). Iranian confidence in government under 50% for first time. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/323231/iranian-confidence-government-first-time.aspx

10.

Garen

J. E.

(1994). Executive compensation and principal-agent theory. Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1175–1199.

11.

Gupta

Davoodi

Alonso-Terme

(2002). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? Economics of Governance, 3(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010100039

12.

Gyimah-Brempong

(2002). Corruption, economic growth, and income inequality in Africa. Economics of Governance, 3(3), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010200045

13.

Hallak

Poisson

(2007). Corrupt schools, corrupt universities: What can be done? IIEP-UNESCO.

14.

Han

(2023). Examining determinants of corruption at the individual level in South Asia. Economies, 11(7), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11070179

15.

Hanf

Van-Melle

Fraisse

Roger

Carme

(2011). Corruption kills: Estimating the global impact of corruption on children deaths. PloS One, 6(11), e26990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026990

16.

Heyneman

S. P.

Anderson

K. H.

Nuraliyeva

(2008). The cost of corruption in higher education. Comparative Education Review, 52(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/524367

17.

Hosseini-Hashemzadeh

(2020). Academic corruption: Typology, measurement method, causes, consequences and strategies to combat it. Aghaz. (in Persian)

18.

Hunt

(2010). Bribery in health care in Uganda. Journal Of Health Economics, 29(5), 699–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.06.004

19.

Johnston

(2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.

20.

Johnston

(2014). Corruption, contention and reform: The power of deep democratization. Cambridge University Press.

21.

Kaufmann

Kraay

Mastruzzi

(2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046

22.

Klitgaard

(1988). Controlling corruption. University of California Press.

23.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc.

24.

Manara

M. U.

Nübold

van Gils

Zijlstra

F. R. H.

(2023). Exploring the path to corruption-an informed grounded theory study on the decision-making process underlying corruption. PloS One, 18(9), e0291819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291819

25.

Miller

W. L.

(2006). Corruption and corruptibility. World Development, 34(2), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.03.008

26.

Mishler

Rose

(2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034001002

27.

Montinola

G. R.

Jackman

R. W.

(2002). Sources of corruption: A cross-country study. British Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000066

28.

Morris

S. D.

Klesner

J. L.

(2010). Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43(10), 1258–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010369072

29.

Mungiu-Pippidi

(2006). Corruption: Diagnosis and treatment. Journal Of Democracy, 17(3), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2006.0050

30.

Olken

B. A.

Pande

(2012). Corruption in developing countries. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), 479–509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110917

31.

Ostrom

(1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585925

32.

Patrinos

H. A.

Kagia

(2007). Maximizing the performance of education systems: The case of teacher absenteeism. In Campos

J. E.

Pradhan

S. K.

(Eds.), The many faces of corruption: Tracking vulnerabilities at the sector level (pp. 63–87). World Bank Publications.

33.

Persson

Rothstein

Teorell

(2013). Why anticorruption reforms fail—systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance, 26(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x

34.

Putnam

R. D.

(2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In Crothers

Lockhart

(eds.), Culture and politics: A reader (pp. 223–234). Palgrave Macmillan.

35.

Qizilbash

(2001). Corruption and human development: A conceptual discussion. Oxford Development Studies, 29(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810120088868

36.

Reinikka

Svensson

(2004). Local capture: Evidence from a central government transfer program in Uganda. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 679–705. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041382120

37.

Ridenour-Jones

(1994). The importance of the concept of conscience-collective in Emile Durkheim's thought: A theoretical and historical analysis . Master’s Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 949.

38.

Rose-Ackerman

Palifka

B. J.

(2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press.

39.

Rothstein

Eek

(2009). Political corruption and social trust: An experimental approach. Rationality and Society, 21(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108099349

40.

Rothstein

Uslaner

E. M.

(2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(1), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0022

41.

Seligson

M. A.

(2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00132

42.

Serra

(2006). Empirical determinants of corruption: A sensitivity analysis. Public Choice, 126(1–2), 225–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-0286-4

43.

Sung

H. E.

(2003). Fairer sex or fairer system? Gender and corruption revisited. Social Forces, 82(2), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0028

44.

Svensson

(2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal Of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005774357860

45.

Tanzi

Davoodi

(1997). Corruption, public investment, and growth. International Monetary Fund.

46.

Tay

Herian

M. N.

Diener

(2014). Detrimental effects of corruption and subjective well-being: Whether, how, and when. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614528544

47.

Transparency International. (2021). What is corruption? Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/what-is-corruption

48.

Transparency International. (2023). Corruption Perceptions Index. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi

49.

Uslaner

E. M.

(2008). Corruption, inequality, and the rule of law: The bulging pocket makes the easy life. Cambridge University Press.

50.

Villoria

(2007). Spain. In Informe Global de la Corrupción 2007: Corrupción en sistemas judiciales. Ediciones del Puerto.

51.

Villoria

Van Ryzin

G. G.

Lavena

C. F.

(2013). Social and political consequences of administrative corruption: A study of public perceptions in Spain. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02613.x

52.

Wickberg

(2021). Understanding corruption in the twenty-first century: Towards a new constructivist research agenda. French Politics, 19(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-020-00144-4

53.

You

J. S.

Khagram

(2005). A comparative study of inequality and corruption. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000107

54.

Zandi

., Esmaeili

., & Farahbakhsh

. (In Press). Designing and validating administrative corruption prevention model based on psycho-contextual etiology and representation of the impacts of administrative corruption on citizens’ lives. Journal of Counseling Research. (in Persian)