This article is part of an international study on meaning-making coping aimed at understanding the role of culture in coping in different cultural settings. The international study was conducted among cancer patients in 10 countries. This article contains the results obtained in the study in Portugal. The main aim is to investigate the impact of culture on the meaning-making coping methods used by cancer patients. In this article, only religious/spiritual coping methods are in focus. Thirty-one participants with various kinds of cancer (e.g., breast, testicular, lymphoma) were interviewed. Nine different kinds of coping methods related to religion and spirituality emerged from analysis of the interviews. These methods, which are categorized on the basis of religious coping’s five basic religious functions, are as follows: seeking spiritual support, spiritual connection, spiritual discontent, benevolent religious reappraisal, punishing god reappraisal, God’s trust in personal strength, support from clergy or members, self-directing religious coping, and active religious surrender. The study confirms the notion that the strategies people employ when they are stricken by disease, accidents, misfortune, and so on are cultural and temporal constructions. As such, they are valid in concrete contexts and time periods. It is, thus, important that cultural context be taken into consideration when exploring the use of meaning-making coping strategies in different countries.
AhmadiF. (2006). Culture, religion and spirituality in coping: The example of cancer patients in Sweden.
Stockholm, Sweden:
Uppsala – Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Retrieved from http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:173404
2.
AhmadiF. (2015). Coping with cancer in Sweden—A search for meaning. Studia sociologica Upsaliensia, 6.3.
Uppsala, Sweden:
Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
3.
AhmadiF., &AhmadiN. (2013).
Nature as the most important coping strategy among cancer patients: A Swedish survey. Journal of Religion and Health,
52(4), 1177–1190. doi:10.1007/s10943-013-9810-2
4.
AhmadiF.AhmadiN. (2018). Existential meaning-making for coping with serious illness: Studies in secular and religious societies.
Stockholm, Sweden:
Routledge.
5.
AhmadiF.CertezÖ. A.ErbilP.OrtakA.AhmadiN. (2017).
A survey study among cancer patients in Turkey: Meaning-making coping. Illness, Crisis and Loss. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1054137317720751
6.
Ahmadi, F., Erbil, P., Ahmadi, N., & Cetrez, Ö. A. (2018). Religion, culture and meaning-making coping: a study among cancer patients in Turkey. Journal of religion and health, 1–10.
7.
AhmadiF.ParkJ.KimK. M.AhmadiN. (2016).
Exploring existential coping resources: The perspective of Koreans with cancer. Journal of Religion and Health,
55(6), 2053–2068. doi:10.1007/s10943-016-0219-6
8.
AhmadiF.ParkJ.KimK. M.AhmadiN. (2017).
Meaning-making coping among cancer patients in Sweden and South Korea: A comparative perspective. Journal of Religion and Health,
56(5), 1794–1811. doi:10.1007/s10943-017-0383-3
9.
AhmadiN.AhmadiF. (2017).
The use of religious coping methods in a secular society: A survey study among cancer patients in Sweden. Illness, Crisis & Loss,
25(3), 171–199. doi:10.1177/1054137315614513
10.
AhmadiN.AhmadiF.ErbilP.CertezÖ. A. (2016).
Religious meaning-making coping in Turkey: A study among cancer patients. Illness, Crisis and Loss. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1054137316672042
11.
BalboniT. A.BalboniM.EnzingerA. C.GallivanK.PaulkM. E.WrightA.PrigersonH. G. (2013).
Provision of spiritual support to patients with advanced cancer by religious communities and associations with medical care at the end of life.JAMA Internal Medicine,
173(12): 1109–1117. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.903
12.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006).
Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology,
3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
13.
BuberM. (1970). I and thou.
New York, NY:
Charles Scribner’s Sons.
14.
CalhounL. G.TedeschiR. G. (1996).
Posttraumatic growth: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma.Journal of Trauma Stress,
9(3), 455–471. doi:10.1007/BF02103658
15.
CalhounL. G.TedeschiR. G. (2004).
Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence.Psychological Inquiry,
15(1), 1–18. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
DixS. (2010).
As esferas seculares e religiosa na sociedade portuguesa [The secular and religious spheres in Portuguese society]. Análise Social,
45(194), 5–27.
20.
DurkheimE. (1915). The elementary forms of religious life.
New York, NY:
Free Press.
21.
EllisonC. G. (1991).
Religious involvement and subjective well-being.Journal of Health and Social Behavior,
32(1), 80–99. doi:10.2307/2136801
22.
ExlineJ. J.PargamentK. I.GrubbsJ. B.YaliA. M. (2014).
The Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale: Development and initial validation.Psychology of Religion and Spirituality,
6(3), 208–222. doi:10.1037/a0036465
23.
FaiginC.PargamentK. (2011). Strengthened by the spirit: religion, spirituality, and resilience through adulthood and aging. In ResnickB.GwitherL.RobertoK. (Eds.), Resilience in aging: Concepts, research, and outcomes (pp. 163–180).
New York, NY:
Springer.
24.
FerraroK. F.KochJ. R. (1994).
Religion and health among black and white adults: Examining social support and consolation.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,
33(4), 362–375.
25.
FreudS. (1961). The future of an illusion.
New York, NY:
Norton.
26.
FrommE. (1950). Psychoanalysis and religion.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
27.
GanzevoortR. R. (1998).
Religious coping reconsidered, part two: A narrative reformulation.Journal of Psychology and Theology,
26(3), 276–286.
28.
GeertzC. (1966). Religion as a cultural system. In BantonM. (Eds.), Anthropological approaches to the study of religion (pp. 1–48).
London, England:
Tavistock.
29.
GranqvistP.MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2010).
Religion as attachment: Normative processes and individual differences.Personality and Social Psychology Review,
14(1), 49–59. doi:10.1177/1088868309348618
30.
HallM. E. L.ShannonhouseL.AtenA.McMartinJ.SilvermanE. S. (2018).
Religion-specific resources for meaning-making from suffering: Defining the territory. Mental Health, Religion & Culture,
21, 77–92. doi:10.1080/13674676.2018.1448770
31.
HeelasP.WoodheadL. (2005). The spiritual revolution: Why religion is giving way to spirituality.
Oxford, England:
Blackwell Publishing.
32.
Hervieu-LegerD. (2005). O peregrino e o convertido: A religião em movimento [The pilgrim and the converted: The religion in motion].
Lisboa, Portugal:
Gradiva.
33.
InozuM.ClarkD. A.KaranciA. N. (2012).
Scrupulosity in Islam: A comparison of highly religious Turkish and Canadian samples.Behavior Therapy,
43(1), 190–202. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.06.002
34.
Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2018). Estatísticas da saúde 2016 [Health statistics 2016].
Lisbon, Portugal:
Author. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
35.
JohnsonP. E. (1959). Psychology of religion.
Nashville, TN:
Abingdon Press.
36.
KehoeN. C. (1998). Religion and mental health from the catholic perspective. In KoeingH. G. (Eds.), Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 211–223).
New York, NY:
Academic Press.
37.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1994). The role of attachment in religious belief and behavior. In PerlmanD.BartholomewK. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 5, pp. 239–265).
London, England:
Jessica Kingsley.
38.
KlaassenD. W.McDonaldM. J.JamesS. (2006). Advance in the study of religious and spiritual coping. In WongP. T.WongL. C. J. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress ad coping (pp. 105–132).
Dallas, TX:
Spring Publications.
39.
La CourP.HvidtN. C. (2010).
Research on meaning-making and health in secular society: Secular, spiritual and religious existential orientations.Social Science & Medicine,
71, 1292–1299.
40.
LazarusS. R.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping.
New York:
Springer.
41.
NelsonJ. (2009). Psychology, religion, spirituality.
New York, NY:
Springer.
42.
PargamentK. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping.
New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
43.
PargamentK. I. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred.
New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
44.
PargamentK. I.CummingsJ. (2010). Anchored by faith religion as a resilience factor. In ReichJ.ZautraA.HallJ. (Eds.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp. 193–210).
New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
45.
PargamentK. I.FeuilleM.BurdzyD. (2011).
The Brief RCOPE: Current psychometric status of a short measure of religious coping.Religions,
2, 51–76.
46.
PargamentK. I.KoenigH. G.PerezL. M. (2000).
The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial variation of the RCOPE.Journal of Clinical Psychology,
56(4), 519–543.
47.
PargamentK. I.OmanbD.PomerleauaJ.MahoneyA. (2017).
Some contributions of a psychological approach to the study of the sacred.Religion,
47(4), 718–744. doi:10.1080/0048721X.2017.1333205
48.
ParkC. L. (2010).
Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events.Psychological Bulletin,
136(2), 257–301.
ShawA.JosephS.LindleyP. A. (2007).
Religion, spirituality, and posttraumatic growth: A systematic review.Mental Health, Religion and Culture,
8(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/1367467032000157981
51.
StaunerN.ExlineJ. J.PargamentK. I. (2016).
Religious and spiritual struggles as concerns for health and well-being.Horizonte,
14(41), 48–75. doi:10.5752/P.2175-5841.2016v14n41p48
52.
TaylorE. B. (1968). The science of culture. In FriedM. H. (Ed.), Readings in anthropology: Cultural and anthropology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–18).
New York, NY:
Thomas Y. Crowell.
WeberM. (1997). The methodology of the social sciences.
New York, NY:
Free Press.
55.
WicksJ. W. (1990). Greater Toledo area survey.
Bowling Green, OH:
Population and Society Research Center.
56.
WiltJ. A.PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J. (2017).
Trajectories of religious/spiritual struggles between years 1 and 2 of college: The predictive role of religious belief salience.International Journal for the Psychology of Religion,
27(4), 172–187. doi:10.1080/10508619.2017.1362186
