This article reports on parental responses to and needs from health-care providers during pregnancy with a lethal fetal diagnosis (LFD). Sixteen mothers and 14 partners participated in a longitudinal, phenomenological study of continuing a pregnancy with an LFD. During individual and joint couple interviews conducted during pregnancy and postpartum, parents described numerous health-care interactions throughout pregnancy. From the participants' words, Categories of the Content, Process, and Outcome of these interactions emerged. They sought health care for the Content (information and expert guidance), but they desired providers who maintain hope, were caring and nonjudgmental, used a straightforward manner, and showed sensitivity to their developmental journey (Process). They also desired health-care systems that provided continuity of care and minimized waiting times (Process). We propose data-based recommendations for health-care providers to address the two identified opposing Outcomes: Feeling Cared For and Experiencing Added Burden.
Brown, C., Gephardt, G., Lloyd, C., Swearingen, C., & Boateng, B. (2011). Teaching palliative care skills using simulated family encounters. MedEdPORTAL. Retrieved from https://www.mededportal.org/publication/8507.
2.
BuckmanR. (2005) Breaking bad news: The S-P-I-K-E-S strategy. Community Oncology2(2): 138–142.
3.
CatlinA.CarterB. (2002) Creation of a neonatal end-of-life palliative care protocol. Journal of Perinatology22(3): 184–195.
4.
ColemanP. K. (2015) Diagnosis of fetal anomaly and the increased maternal psychological toll associated with pregnancy termination. Issues in Law & Medicine30(1): 3–23.
5.
Côté-ArsenaultD.Denney-KoelschE. (2011) “My baby is a person”: Family experiences with life-threatening fetal diagnosis. Journal of Palliative Medicine14(12): 1302–1308.
6.
Côté-ArsenaultD.Denney-KoelschE. (2016) “Have no regrets”: Parents' experiences and developmental tasks in pregnancy with a lethal fetal diagnosis. Social Science & Medicine154: 100–109. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.033.
7.
Côté-ArsenaultD.KrowchukH.HallW. J.Denney-KoelschE. (2015) We want what's best for our baby: Prenatal parenting of babies with lethal conditions. Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health29(3): 157–176.
8.
Denney-KoelschE.Côté-ArsenaultD.Lemcke-BernoE. (2015) Parents' experiences with ultrasound during pregnancy with a lethal fetal diagnosis. Global Qualitative Nursing Research2: 1–8.
9.
DonabedianA. (1988) The quality of care: How can it be assessed?JAMA260(12): 1743–1748.
10.
EnglishN. K.HesslerK. L. (2013) Prenatal birth planning for families of the imperiled newborn. Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing42: 390–399.
11.
FeudtnerC.MunsonD. (2009) The ethics of perinatal palliative care. In: RavitskyV.FeisterA.CaplanA. (eds) The penn center guide to bioethics, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 509–518.
GuonJ.WilfondB. S.FarlowB.BrazgT.JanvierA. (2013) Our children are not a diagnosis: The experience of parents who continue their pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13 or 18. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A164(A): 308–318.
14.
HaJ. F.AnatD. S.LongneckerN. (2010) Doctor-patient communication: A review. The Ochsner Journal10: 38–43.
15.
HeuserC. C.EllerA. G.ByrneJ. L. (2012) Survey of physicians' approach to severe fetal anomalies. Journal of Medical Ethics38: 391–395.
16.
HillD. L.FeudtnerC. (2016) Hope, hopefulness, and pediatric palliative care. In: BlackB. P.WrightP. M.LimboR. (eds) Perinatal and pediatrics bereavement in nursing and other health professions, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 223–247.
17.
Hill, D. L., Miller, V. A., Walter, J. K., Carroll, K. W., Morrison, W. Munson, D. L. … Feudtner, C. (2014). Regoaling: A conceptual model of how parents of children with serious illness changes medical care goals. BMC Palliative Care, 13, 9. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472–684X/13/9.
18.
HowardE. D. (2006) Family-centered care in the context of fetal abnormality. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing20(3): 237–242.
KavanaughK.RoscignoC. I.SwansonK. M.SavageT. A.KimuraR. E.KilpatrickS. J. (2015) Perinatal palliative care: Parent perceptions of caring in interactions surrounding counseling for risk of delivering an extremely premature infant. Palliative and Supportive Care13: 145–155.
21.
LalorJ. G.BegleyC. M.GalavanE. (2008) A grounded theory study of information preference and coping styles following antenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality. Journal of Advanced Nursing64(2): 462–472.
22.
LathropA.VandeVusseL. (2011) Continuity and change in mothers' narratives of perinatal hospice. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing26(1): 21–31. doi:10.1097/JPN.0b13e3181ta9c60.
23.
LeuthnerS.JonesE. (2007) Fetal concerns program: A model for perinatal palliative care. The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing32(5): 272–327.
24.
LimboR.ToceS.PeckT. (2009) Resolve through sharing position paper on perinatal palliative care, La Crosse, WI: Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation, Inc.(Original work published 2008).
25.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). The phenomenology of perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1945).
26.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014) Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3rd. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
27.
MunsonD.LeuthnerS. R. (2007) Palliative care for the family carrying a fetus with a life-limiting diagnosis. Pediatric Clinical Nursing America54: 787–798.
28.
OstermanM. J. K.KochanekK. D.MacDormanM. F.StobinoD. M.GuyerB. (2015) Annual summary of vital statistics: 2012–2013. Pediatrics135(6): 1115–1125.
29.
SandelowskiM.BarrosoJ. (2005) The travesty of choosing after positive prenatal diagnosis. Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing34: 307–318.
30.
SchechtmanK. B.GrayD. L.BatyJ. D.RothmanS. M. (2002) Decision-making for termination for pregnancies with fetal anomalies: Analysis of 53,000 pregnancies. Obstetric Gynecology99(2): 216–222.
31.
StewartM. (2001) Towards a global definition of patient centered care: The patient should be the judge of patient centered care. British Medical Journal322(7284): 444–445.
32.
TararbitK.LelongN.JouannicJ. M.GoffinetF.KhoshnoodB.EPICARD Study Group (2015) Is the probability of prenatal diagnosis or termination of pregnancy different for fetuses with congenital anomalies conceived following assisted reproductive techniques? A population-based evaluation of fetuses with congenital heart defects. British Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology122(7): 924–931.
33.
ToselloB.DanyL.CireC.BétrémieuxP.Vriet-NdourM.Le CozP.EinaudiM. (2014) Perceptions of lethal fetal abnormality among perinatal professionals and the challenges of neonatal palliative care. Journal of Palliative Medicine17(8): 924–930. doi:10.1089/jpm.2014.0023.
WoolC. (2013) State of the science on perinatal palliative care. Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic Neonatal Nursing42: 372–382.
36.
WoolC.Côté-ArsenaultD.Perry BlackB.Denney-KoelschE.KimS.KavanaughK. (2015) Provision of services in perinatal palliative care: A multicenter survey in the United States. Journal of Palliative Medicine19(3): 279–285.
