This article reports findings from a phenomenological inquiry into how parents experience End-of-Life (EOL) photography around the death of their newborn in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and in their lives beyond the hospital. The study involved semi-structured interviews with 10 parents who had experienced the death of their newborn within the last five years in the same NICU setting. All parents had participated in EOL photography, having photos taken by nurses, by themselves, and/or by volunteer professional photographers. Through an Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis, the theme of “living relationships” emerged, revealing the photography as valued more than for the photos as “mementos,” but further as an activity grounding relationships and fostering interaction between families, newborns, and care-providers; these findings provide insight into how parents came to see their EOL photos as “prized possessions.” The article is concluded with a discussion on a Model for Photographing Living Relationships.
BennerP. E. (1994). Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BorgS. & LaskerJ. (1989). When pregnancy fails: Families coping with miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth, and infant death. New York: Bantam Books.
3.
BosticcoC. & ThompsonT. L. (2005). Narratives and story telling in coping with grief and bereavement. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 51(1), 1–16.
4.
CalhounL. K. (1994). Parents' perceptions of nursing support following neonatal loss. Journal of Perinatal Neonatal Nursing, 8, 57–66.
5.
CholetteM. & GephartS. (2012). A model for the dynamics of bereavement caregiving. International Journal of Childbirth Education, 27(2), 14–18.
6.
DyregrovK. (2004). Bereaved parents' experience of research participation. Social Science & Medicine, 58(2), 391–400.
7.
ForrestG. C. & BaumJ. D. (1982). Support after perinatal death: A study of support and counselling after perinatal bereavement. British Medical Journal, 285, 1475–2479.
8.
FurmanE. (1978). The death of a newborn: Care of the parents. Birth and the Family Journal, 5, 214–218.
9.
GenschB. K. & MidlandD. (2000). When a baby dies: A standard of care. Illness, Crisis & Loss, 8(3), 3286–3295.
10.
HarperD. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17, 13–26.
11.
HughesC. B. & Page-LiebermanJ. (1989). Fathers experiencing a perinatal loss. Death Studies, 13(6), 537–556.
12.
IlseS. (1982). Empty arms: Coping after miscarriage, stillbirth and infant death. Long Lake, MN: Wintergreen Press.
13.
Ives-BaineL. (2013). When birth and death collide: Best practices in end-of-life at the beginning. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
14.
JungA.MilneP.WilcoxJ. & RoofN. (2003). Neonatal hand casting method. Journal of Perinatology, 23, 519–520.
15.
KennelJ. H.SlyterH. & KlausM. H. (1970). The mourning response of parents to the deathofa newborn infant. The New England Journal of Medicine, 283(7), 344–349.
16.
KlausM. H. & KennellJ. H. (1976). Maternal—infant bonding. St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby Company.
17.
LaskerJ. N. & ToedterL. J. (1994). Satisfaction with hospital care and interventions after pregnancy loss. Death Studies, 18, 41–64.
18.
LauxJ. (1988). SHARE baby pictures questionnaire. SHARE Newsletter, 11(10). Available via the Share Pregnancy and Infant Loss Support organization at www.nationalshareoffice.com.
19.
LayneL. (2000). “He was a real baby with real baby things”: A material culture analysis of personhood, parenthood and pregnancy loss. Journal of Material Culture, 5, 321–345.
20.
LayneL. (2003). Motherhood lost, a feminist account of pregnancy loss in America. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
LeonI. G. (1992). Perinatal loss: A critique of current hospital practices. Clinical Pediatrics, 31, 366–374.
22.
LimboR. & KoblerK. (2010). The tie that binds: Relationships in perinatal bereavement. MCN, American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 35(6), 316–321; quiz 321–313.
23.
LimboR. & WheelerS. (1986). When a baby dies: A handbook for healing and helping. La Crosse, WI: Resolve Through Sharing, La Crosse Lutheran Hospital.
24.
LopezK. A. & WillisD. G. (2004). Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: Their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qualitative Health Research, 14(5), 726–735.
25.
MassimiM. (2012). Thanatosensitively designed technologies for bereavement support. Toronto: University of Toronto.
26.
Merleau-PontyM. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
Merleau-PontyM. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
28.
McCartneyP. (2007). Digital bereavement photography. MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 32(5), 322.
29.
NorlykA. & HarderI. (2010). What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies. Qualitative Health Research, 20(3), 420–431.
30.
PeppersL. G. & KnappR. J. (1980). Motherhood and mourning: Perinatal death. Westport CT: Praeger Publishers.
PrimeauM. & RechtC. (1994). Professional bereavement photographs: One aspect of a perinatal bereavement program. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 23(1), 22–25.
33.
RadleyA. & TaylorD. (2003). Remembering one's stay in hospital: A study in photography, recovery and forgetting. Health, 7(2), 129–159.
34.
SextonP. R. & StephenS. B. (1991). Postpartum mothers' perceptions of nursing interventions for perinatal grief. Neonatal Network, 9, 47–51.
35.
SharmaS.Reimer-KirkhamS. & CochraneM. (2009). Practicing the awareness of embodiment in qualitative health research: Methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11). 1642–1650.
36.
SmithJ. A. & OsbornM. (2008). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In SmithJ.A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed.; pp. 53–80). London, UK: Sage Publications.
SmithJ. A.JarmanM. & OsborneM. (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In MurrayM. & ChamberlainK. (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods. London, UK: Sage.
39.
SwansonK. (1991). Empirical development of a middle range theory of caring. Nursing Research, 40(3), 161–165.
40.
TaylorB. & de VochtH. (2011). Interviewing separately or as couples? Considerations of authenticity of method. Qualitative Health Research, 21(11), 1576–1587.
41.
ToedterL. J.LaskerJ. N. & AlhadeffJ. M. (1988). The Perinatal Grief Scale: Development and initial validation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 435–449.
42.
WojnarD. M. & SwansonK. M. (2007). Phenomenology: An exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 25(3), 172–180.
43.
WorkmanE. (2001). Guiding parents through the death of their infant. JOGNN, 30(6), 569–573.
44.
ZahourekR. & JensenJ. (1973). Grieving and the loss of a newborn. American Journal of Nursing, 73, 834–839.
