A universal adjustment to pandemic restrictions for the colleges and university outdoor programs we interviewed was limiting travel. This forced outdoor programs to modify their offerings. Some chose to use closer outdoor venues.
Purpose
This investigation sought to understand if college outdoor leaders believed they achieved or could achieve their program's goals using nearby nature from March 2020 until travel restrictions were lifted—usually beginning in fall 2021—as well as if the use of closer outdoor venues stayed the same or increased after that.
Methodology
This study gathered data through semi-structured interviews (n = 14) with college outdoor program leaders.
Findings
College outdoor leaders reported they were able to achieve some to most of their program's goals, like teaching trip planning skills and providing opportunities for social contact with others by using nearby nature. Once pandemic travel restrictions were lifted, programs largely returned to distant programming.
Implications
Given the reduction of barriers to participation (e.g., cost and travel logistics) and the benefits (positive health outcomes and socialization) identified in this study of programming in nearby nature, college outdoor leaders are encouraged to increase programming in nearby nature to achieve some of their program goals.
AndreE. K.WilliamsN.SchwartzF.BullardC. (2017). Benefits of campus outdoor recreation programs: A review of the literature. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 9(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.18666/jorel-2017-v9-i1-7491
2.
ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH (2023). ATLAS.ti Mac (version 23.2.1) [Qualitative data analysis software]. https://atlasti.com.
3.
BellB. J. (2022). The third census of outdoor orientation programs in the United States, 2019. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 14(3), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2022-11219
4.
BellB. J.GassM. A.NafzigerC. S.StarbuckJ. D. (2014). The state of knowledge of outdoor orientation programs: Current practices, research, and theory. Journal of Experiential Education, 37(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825913518891
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Qualitative research in psychology using thematic analysis in psychology using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
6.
CorralizaJ. A.ColladoS.BethelmyL. (2017). Effects of nearby nature on urban children's stress. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 2(3), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.21834/aje-bs.v2i3.186
7.
CoxD. T.ShanahanD. F.HudsonH. L.FullerR. A.AndersonK., et al. (2017). Doses of nearby nature simultaneously associated with multiple health benefits. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020172
8.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
9.
CrononW. (1996). The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature. American Society for Environmental History and the Forest History, 1(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985059
10.
DegenhardtB.FrickJ.BucheckerM.GutscherH. (2011). Influences of personal, social, and environmental factors on workday use frequency of the nearby outdoor recreation areas by working people. Leisure Sciences, 33(5), 420–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2011.606780
11.
DeringerS. A.WigginsA. Y. (2018). Lasting impacts of outdoor orientation programming: A preliminary study using longitudinal data. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education & Leadership, 10(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2018-V10-I2-7968
12.
De YoungR.ScheuerK.BrownT.StewartJ. (2017, January). Some psychological benefits of urban nature: Mental vitality from time spent in nearby nature. In ColumbusA. M. (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (116 ed, pp. 94–120). Nova Science Publishers.
13.
EwertA.MittenD.OverholtJ. (2021). Health and natural landscapes: Concepts and applications. Cabi Press.
14.
HainesD. J. (2001). Undergraduate student benefits from university recreation. NIRSA Journal, 25(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1123/rsj.37.2.97
KimmererR. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.
18.
LeonardA. M.EwertA. W.Lieberman-RaridonK.MittenD.RabinowitzE.DeringerS. A.AndersonI. (2022). Outdoor adventure and experiential education and COVID-19: What have we learned?Journal of Experiential Education, 45(3), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259211050762
19.
McFaddenC. W.StentaD. A. (2015). Connecting collegiate recreation and athletics to leadership. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2015(147), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20139
20.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
MittenD. (2017). Connections, compassion, and co-healing: The ecology of relationship. In MaloneK.TruongS.GrayT. (Eds.), Reimagining sustainability in precarious times (pp. 173–186). Springer.
23.
MittenD.D’AmoreC. (2017). The relationship of women’s body image and experience in nature. In D. Vakoch & S. Mickey (Eds.), Women and nature?: Beyond dualism in gender, body, and environment (pp. 96–116).
24.
MittenD.OverholtJ. R.HaynesF. I.D’AmoreC. C.AdyJ. C. (2016). Hiking a low-cost, accessible intervention to promote health benefits. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 2(4), 302–310. 1559827616658229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827616658229
25.
MuirJ. (1911). My first summer in the Sierra. Houghton Mifflin.
26.
NashR. (1973). Wilderness and the American mind. Yale University Press.
27.
National Intramural–Recreational Sports Association (2004). The value of recreational sports in higher education. Human Kinetics.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed). Sage.
30.
ShellmanA.HillE. (2017). Flourishing through resilience: The impact of a college outdoor education program. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 35(4), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2017-V35-I4-7779
31.
Twohig-BennettC.JonesA. (2018). The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environmental Research, 166(February), 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030
32.
WebbD. J. (2001). The Emergence and evolution of outdoor adventure programs, 1863-2000: A history of student initiated outing programs. Entire proceedings: http://www. aore. org/ICOREProceedings2001.pdf.
33.
WolfK. L.DerrienM. M.KrugerL. E.PenbrookeT. L. (2020). Chapter 6: Nature, outdoor experiences, and human health. In SelinS.CervenyL. K.BlahnaD. J.MillerA. B. (Eds.), Igniting research for outdoor recreation: Linking science, policy, and action. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-987 (pp. 85–100). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
34.
WolskoC.LindbergK. (2013). Experiencing connection with nature: The matrix of psychological well-being, mindfulness, and outdoor recreation. Ecopsychology, 5(2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2013.0008
35.
ZylstraM. J.KnightA. T.EslerK. J., et al. (2014). Connectedness as a core conservation concern: An interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Science Reviews, 2(1–2), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3
