Background: Service-learning is a widely adopted approach in higher education institutions globally, integrating civic engagement experiences into academic curricula while being responsive to the development of local communities. Purpose: This study aimed to assess the impact on students in participating in voluntary semester-long service-learning labs and courses in comparison to traditional labs and courses. Methodology/Approach: A quantitative online survey was administered to 110 students at the beginning and end of the lectures, investigating four psychosocial variables of citizenship: social justice attitude, cognitive empowerment, sense of community responsibility, and civic engagement. The post-survey also collected data on the participants’ quality of participation experiences. Findings/Conclusions: Analyses performed on data revealed no statistically significant group differences over time in all examined variables, except for the quality of participation experiences, where service-learning students scored significantly higher than other students. Factors potentially influencing these results include the students’ perception of their competence, the duration of the service-learning program, and relying on self-reported measures. Implications: This study contributes to the advancement of experiential learning knowledge emphasizing the significance of methodological rigor, underpinning a narrative that leverages failure to foster understanding. Future research could further explore the role of quality of participation experiences in service-learning.
AlamI.RamirezK.SemsarK.CorwinL. A. (2023). Predictors of scientific civic engagement (PSCE) survey: A multidimensional instrument to measure undergraduates’ attitudes, knowledge, and intention to engage with the community using their science skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-02-0032
2.
AlbanesiC.CicognaniE.ZaniB. (2007). Sense of community, civic engagement and social wellbeing in Italian adolescents. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(5), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.903
3.
ArdoinN. M.BowersA. W.GaillardE. (2023). A systematic mixed studies review of civic engagement outcomes in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 29(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2135688
4.
ArinzeN.MalaJ.KleinM.EvanovichJ. (2022). Developing social justice outcomes through service learning among sport management students. Sport Management Education Journal, 16(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2020-0092
5.
AshS. L.ClaytonP. H. (2009). Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection in applied learning. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education,1(1), 25–48. https://hdl.handle.net/1805/4579
6.
BilligS. H.RootS.JesseD. (2005). The impact of participation in service- learning on high school students’ civic engagement(CIRCLE Working Paper 33). University of Maryland, Center for Information and Re- search on Civic Learning and Engagement.
7.
BoydN. M. (2015). Introducing thriving at work to the field of community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology,43(6), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21752
8.
BoydN. M.NowellB. (2017). Testing a theory of sense of community and community responsibility in organisations: An empirical assessment of predictive capacity on employee well-being and organisational citizenship. Journal of Community Psychology, 45(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21843
9.
BoydN. M.NowellB. (2020). Sense of community, sense of community responsibility, organisational commitment and identification, and public service motivation: A simultaneous test of affective states on employee well-being and engagement in a public service work context. Public Management Review, 22(7), 1024–1050. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1740301
10.
BringleR. G.HatcherJ. A. (1995). A service-learning curriculum for faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,2, 112–122.
11.
BringleR. G.RuizA. I.BrownM. A.ReebR. N. (2016). Enhancing the psychology curriculum through service learning. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 15(3), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716659966
12.
BrodskyA. E.CattaneoL. B. (2013). A transconceptual model of empowerment and resilience: Divergence, convergence and interactions in kindred community concepts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3-4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9599-x
13.
ButinD. (2010). Service-learning in theory and practice: The future of community engagement in higher education. Springer.
14.
ButinD. W. (2003). Of what use is it? Multiple conceptualisations of service learning within education. Teachers College Record,105(9), 1674–1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810310500903
15.
ButinD. W. (2008). Service-learning and social justice education: Strengthening justice-oriented community based models of teaching and learning. Routledge.
16.
CamusR. M.LamC. H.NgaiG.ChanS. C. (2022). Service-learning exchange in developed cities: Dissonances and civic outcomes. Journal of Experiential Education, 45(4), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382592110659
17.
CelioC. I.DurlakJ.DymnickiA. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.5193/jee34.2.164
18.
ChanK.NgE.ChanC. C. (2016). Empowering students through service-learning of community psychology: A case in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(4), 25–36. Retrieved from: https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1306
CoelhoM.MenezesI. (2021). University social responsibility, service learning, and students’ personal, professional, and civic education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 617300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617300
21.
CompareC.AlbanesiC. (2022). Stand together by staying apart: Extreme online service-learning during the pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2749. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052749
22.
CompareC.AlbanesiC. (2023). Belief, attitude and critical understanding. A systematic review of social justice in Service-Learning experiences. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 332–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2639
23.
CompareC.Brozmanová GregorováA.CulcasiI.AramburuzabalaP.AlbanesiC. (2023). “The farmer, the guide, and the bridge”: The voice of community partners within European Service-Learning. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2271896
24.
CompareC.PieriC.AlbanesiC. (2022). Community-university partnership in service-learning: Voicing the community side. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 26(2).
25.
CompareC.PratiG.GuarinoA.GattiF.ProcenteseF.FediA.AlbanesiC. (2021). Predictors of prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 national lockdown in Italy: Testing the role of psychological sense of community and other community assets. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 7(2), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1285/i24212113v7i2p22
26.
CompareC.RiveroC.Vargas MonizM. J.AlbanesiC. (submitted for publication). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness: Unpacking faculty motivation in service-learning. Higher Education Research & Development.
27.
ConwayJ. M.AmelE. L.GerwienD. P. (2009). Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning's effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 36(4), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280903172969
DrennanJ.HydeA. (2008). Controlling response shift bias: The use of the retrospective pre-test design in the evaluation of a master's programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(6), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701773026
30.
EinfeldA.CollinsD. (2008). The relationships between service-learning, social justice, multi-cultural competence, and civic engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 49(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2008.0017
31.
FaulconerE. (2021). eService-Learning: A decade of research in undergraduate online service–learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 35(2), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1849941
32.
FerreiraP. D.AzevedoC. N.MenezesI. (2012). The developmental quality of participation experiences: Beyond the rhetoric that “participation is always good!”. Journal of Adolescence, 35(3), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.09.004
33.
FerreiraP. D.MenezesI. (2001). Questionário das experiencias de participação. Unpublished manuscript, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
34.
FiniR.RasmussenE.SiegelD.WiklundJ. (2018). Rethinking the commercialisation of public science: From entrepreneurial outcomes to societal impacts. Academy of Management Perspectives,32(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0206
35.
FleckB.HusseyH. D.Rutledge-EllisonL. (2017). Linking class and community: An investigation of service learning. Teaching of Psychology, 44(3), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317711317
36.
FolgueirasP.AramburuzabalaP.OpazoH.MugarraA.RuizA. (2020). Service-learning: A survey of experiences in Spain. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 15(2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197918803857
GeierI.HasagerU. (2020, December). Do service learning and active-citizenship learning support our students to live a culture of democracy?. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 5, p. 606326). Frontiers Media SA.
39.
GonzálezC.VarelaJ.SánchezP. A.VenegasF.De Tezanos-PintoP. (2021). Students’ participation in school and its relationship with antisocial behavior, academic performance and adolescent well-being. Child Indicators Research, 14(1), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09761-5
40.
GrapinS. L.CunninghamD. J.SitalM. (2021). Preparing social justice advocates through undergraduate service learning in school psychology. School Psychology Review, 52(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1878389
41.
GutzweilerR.PfeifferS.In-AlbonT. (2022). ‘I can succeed at this’: Engagement in service learning in schools enhances university students’ self-efficacy. Studies in Higher Education, 47(12), 2539–2552. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2091126
42.
HambyA.BrinbergD. (2016). International service learning as social value cocreation. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 28(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2015.1015383
43.
HeS. E. (2019). Finding home: Developing a sense of belonging through service-learning. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 7(1), 11483.
44.
Hok-kaC. M.Wing-fungC. C.Cheung-mingA. C. (2016). The long-term impact of service-learning on graduates’ civic engagement and career exploration in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(4), 37–56.
45.
HudaM.JasmiK. A.AlasY.QodriahS. L.DacholfanyM. I.JamsariE. A. (2018). Empowering civic responsibility: Insights from service learning. In Engaged scholarship and civic responsibility in higher education (pp. 144–165). IGI Global.
46.
JacobyB. (2014). Service-learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lessons learned. John Wiley & Sons.
47.
KnappT.FisherB.Levesque-BristolC. (2010). Service-learning’s impact on college students’ commitment to future civic engagement, self-efficacy, and social empowerment. Journal of Community Practice, 18(2–3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2010.490152
48.
KnudsenM. P.FrederiksenM. H.GoduscheitR. C. (2021). New forms of engagement in third mission activities: A multilevel university-centric approach. Innovation, 23(2), 209–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1670666
49.
KrugerJ.DunningD. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognising one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
50.
LanghoutR. D.GordonD. L. (2021). Outcomes for underrepresented and misrepresented college students in service-learning classes: Supporting agents of change. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(3), 408. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000151
51.
LeT. U.JohnsonS. K.LernerJ. V. (2023). Exploring moderators of the relationship between adolescents’ social responsibility and civic actions. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2618
52.
LeeJ.ChangS. H.HaegeleJ. A. (2020). Does service learning work? Attitudes of college students toward individuals with disabilities. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825920918887
53.
LiM.FriezeI. H. (2016). Developing civic engagement in university education: Predicting current and future engagement in community services. Social Psychology of Education, 19(4), 775–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9356-8
54.
LiY.YaoM.SongF.FuJ.ChenX. (2019). Building a just world: The effects of service-learning on social justice beliefs of Chinese college students. Educational Psychology,39(5), 591–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1530733
55.
LiuR. L.HsiungH. L. (2019). The impact on the learning outcomes of service-learning curriculum for college students in Taiwan. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 14(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00006_1
56.
LuddenA. B. (2011). Engagement in school and community civic activities among rural adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(9), 1254–1270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9536-3
57.
LykesM. B. (2017). Community-based and participatory action research: Community psychology collaborations within and across borders. In BondM. A.Serrano-GarcíaI.KeysC. B.ShinnM. (Eds.), APA handbook of community psychology: Methods for community research and action for diverse groups and issues (pp. 43–58). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14954-003
MenezesI. (2003). Participation experiences and civic concepts, attitudes and engagement: Implications for citizenship education projects. European Educational Research Journal,2(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2003.2.3.8
60.
MoelyB. E.MercerS. H.IlustreV.MironD.McFarlandM. (2002). Psychometric properties and correlates of the Civic Attitudes and Skills Questionnaire (CASQ): A measure of students’ attitudes related to service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 8(2), 15–26.
61.
MtawaN. N.NkhomaN. M. (2020). Service-learning as a higher education pedagogy for advancing citizenship, conscientization and civic agency: A capability informed view. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1788969
62.
OsborneR. E.HammerichS.HensleyC. (1998). Student effects of service-learning: Tracking change across a semester. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5(1), 5–13.
63.
PetscherY.SchatschneiderC. (2011). A simulation study on the performance of the simple difference and covariance-adjusted scores in randomised experimental designs. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00129.x
64.
PrilleltenskyI. (2001). Value-based praxis in community psychology: Moving toward social justice and social action. American Journal of Community Psychology,29(5), 747–778. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010417201918
65.
PratiG.ProcenteseF.AlbanesiC.CicognaniE.FediA.GattiF.GattinoS. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the sense of community responsibility scale. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(6), 1770–1790. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22366
66.
RichardD.KeenC.HatcherJ. A.PeaseH. A. (2016). Pathways to adult civic engagement: Benefits of reflection and dialogue across difference in higher education service-learning programs. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 23(1), 60–74.
67.
Rimm-KaufmanS. E.MerrittE. G.LapanC.DeCosterJ.HuntA.BowersN. (2021). Can service-learning boost science achievement, civic engagement, and social skills? A randomized controlled trial of connect science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 74, 101236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101236
68.
Ruiz-MonteroP. J.Chiva-BartollO.Salvador-GarcíaC.González-GarcíaC. (2020). Learning with older adults through intergenerational service learning in physical education teacher education. Sustainability, 12(3), 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031127
69.
SalamM.IskandarD. N. A.IbrahimD. H. A.FarooqM. S. (2019). Service learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review,20(4), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09580-6
70.
SoriaK. M.HufnagleA. S.DoT. (2019). Exploring the differential effects of service-learning on students’ sense of belonging: Does social class matter?International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 7(1), 1–16.
71.
SpeckB. W.HoppeS. L. (Eds.). (2004). Service-learning: History, theory, and issues. Greenwood Publishing Group.
72.
SpeerP. W.PetersonN. A.ChristensB. D.ReidR. J. (2019). Youth cognitive empowerment: Development and evaluation of an instrument. American Journal of Community Psychology, 64(3–4), 528–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12339
Van EedenE.EloffI.DippenaarH. (2021). On responses of higher education and training with (in) society through research, teaching, and community engagement. Educational Research for Social Change, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2021/v10i1a1
75.
VienoA.NationM.PerkinsD. D.SantinelloM. (2007). Civic participation and the development of adolescent behavior problems. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(6), 761–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20177
76.
YorioP. L.YeF. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects of service learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0072
77.
ZimmermanM. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology,23(5), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983
78.
ZuccheroR. A.GibsonJ. E. (2019). A comparison of intergenerational service-learning and traditional pedagogy among undergraduate psychology students. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718823970
