Background: Experiential learning is commonly used in postsecondary settings, especially in undergraduate, agricultural, and laboratory courses. However, a lack of attention has been paid by educators to critical components of experiential learning. Purpose: The effects of reflection mode (peer-verbal or written journal reflection) and transfer level (same, near, or far transfer) on students’ content knowledge were examined in a postsecondary, animal science, laboratory course. Methodology/Approach: A quasi-experimental, two-way, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was utilized. This 2 × 3 factorial design was utilized to test the main and interaction effects of two independent variables (reflection mode and transfer level) on one dependent variable (content knowledge). A pretest score was included as a covariate to control for students’ prior knowledge. Findings/Conclusions: There was a significant interaction effect between the independent variables of reflection mode and transfer level on the dependent variable of content knowledge. Written reflection (when coupled with near transfer), and same transfer (when coupled with peer-verbal reflection), were statistically significant. Implication: Multiple modes of reflection and application can be used during experiential learning in order to achieve effective content knowledge gains. When experiential learning is planned and developed with intentionality, learners receive a valuable, educative experience.
AdamsK. A. (2002). What colleges and universities want in new faculty. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
2.
AryD.JacobsL. C.SorensenC. K. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth.
3.
BakerM. A.BrownN. R.BlackburnJ.RobinsonJ. S. (2014). Determining the effects that the order of abstraction and type of reflection have on content knowledge when teaching experientially: An exploratory experiment. Journal of Agricultural Education,55(2), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.02106
4.
BakerM. A.RobinsonJ. S.KolbD. A. (2012). Aligning Kolb’s experiential learning theory with a comprehensive agricultural education model. Journal of Agricultural Education,53(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.04001
5.
BlackburnJ. J.RobinsonJ. S.KacalA. (2015). Determining the effects of reflection type and cognitive style on students’ content knowledge. Journal of Agricultural Education,56(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.03195
6.
BoyerE. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
7.
CampbellJ. R. (1998). Reclaiming a lost heritage: Land-grant and other higher education initiatives for the twenty-first century. Michigan State University Press.
8.
CampioneJ. C.ShapiroA. M.BrownA. L. (1995). Forms of transfer in a community of learners: Flexible learning and understanding. In McKeoughA.LupartJ.MariniA. (eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 35–68). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
ColemanB. M. (2022). Examining the effects of reflection mode and transfer level on students’ content knowledge, post course retention, and transfer skills while learning experientially [Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida]. University of Florida Digital Collections. https://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0058601/00001
11.
ColemanB. M.BunchJ. C.ThoronA. C.RobertsT. G. (2020). Examining the effects of reflection type and abstraction order on content knowledge and content knowledge retention during experiential learning. Journal of Agricultural Education,61(3), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.03308
12.
ColemanB. M.BunchJ. C.ThoronA. C.RobertsT. G. (2021). Examining the effects of reflection type and abstraction order on students’ scientific reasoning skills during experiential learning. Journal of Agricultural Education,62(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2021.02013
13.
ConnerN. W.RobertsT. G. (2015). The cultural adaptation process during a short-term study abroad experience in Swaziland. Journal of Agricultural Education,56(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.01155
14.
CreeV. E. (2000). The challenge of assessment. In CreeV. E.MacaulayC. (eds.), Transfer of learning in professional and vocational education (pp. 27–52). Routledge.
CrossC. F.II. (2012). Democracy, the west, and land-grant colleges. In FogelD. M.Malson-HuddleE. (eds.), Precipice or crossroads? Where America’s great public universities stand and where they are going midway through their second century (pp. 1–16). State University of New York Press.
17.
DennyM. D.HardingA. M. (2020). Mississippi State university extension undergraduate apprenticeship program: A model for critical reflection through community-engaged research and outreach. Advancements in Agricultural Development,1(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v1i1.13
18.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. Simon & Schuster.
19.
DiBenedettoC. A.BlytheJ. M.MyersB. E. (2017). Effects of the order of abstraction and type of reflection on content knowledge when teaching experientially in a high school classroom. Journal of Agricultural Education,58(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.02067
20.
DooleyD. (2001). Social research methods (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.
HaskellR. E. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction, and reasoning. Academic Press.
28.
HubbsD. L.BrandC. F. (2005). The paper mirror: Understanding reflective journaling. Journal of Experiential Education,28(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F105382590502800107
29.
JaccardJ. (1998). Interaction effects in factorial analysis of variance. Sage Publications.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (1st ed.). Prentice-Hall.
34.
KolbD. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
35.
LammA. J.CannonK. J.RobertsT. G.IraniT. A.Unruh SnyderL. J.BrendemuhlJ.RodriguezM. T. (2011). An exploration of reflection: Expression of learning style in an international experiential learning context. Journal of Agricultural Education,52(3), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.03122
36.
LooR.ThorpeK. (2002). Using reflective learning journals to improve individual and team performance. Team Performance Management,8(5/6), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590210442258
37.
MacaulayC. (2000). Transfer of learning. In CreeV. E.MacaulayC. (eds.), Transfer of learning in professional and vocational education (pp. 1–26). Routledge.
38.
MartinM. V. (2001). The land-grant university in the 21st century. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics,33(2), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800005836
39.
MaxwellS. E.DelaneyH. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
40.
MilesJ.ShevlinM. (2001) Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers.Sage Publications.
41.
National Research Council. (2009). Transforming agricultural education for a changing world. The National Academies Press.
42.
NilsonL. B. (2016). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
43.
PageM. C.BaileyL. E.LinH.JacobsS. C.BrunerB. (2014). Teaching and learning. In SternbergR. J. (ed.), The modern land-grant university (pp. 15–33). Purdue University Press.
44.
PhippsL. J.OsborneE. W.DyerJ. E.BallA. (2008). Handbook on agricultural education in public schools (6th ed.). Thomson Delmar Learning.
45.
QuayJ. (2003). Experience and participation: Relating theories of learning. Journal of Experiential Education,26(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590302600208
46.
RobertsT. G. (2006). A philosophical examination of experiential learning theory for agricultural educators. Journal of Agricultural Education,47(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2006.01017
47.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Basic Books, Inc.
48.
SeamanJ. (2008). Experience, reflect, critique: The end of the ‘learning cycles’ era. Journal of Experiential Education,31(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590803100103
49.
ShouldersC. W.MyersB. E. (2012). Teachers’ use of agricultural laboratories in secondary agricultural education. Journal of Agricultural Education,53(2), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.02124
50.
ShouldersC. W.MyersB. E. (2013). Teachers’ use of experiential learning stages in agricultural laboratories. Journal of Agricultural Education,54(3), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.03100
51.
SilverN. (2013). Reflective pedagogies and the metacognitive turn in college teaching. In KaplanM.SilverN.Lavaque-MantyD.MeizlishD. (eds.), Using reflection and metacognition to improve student learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy (pp. 1–17). Stylus Publishing.
ThorpeK. (2004). Reflective learning journals: From concept to practice. International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives,5(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462394042000270655
56.
WiersmaW.JursS. G. (1990). Educational measurement and testing (2nd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
57.
WrightM. C.BernsteinJ. L.WilliamsR. (2013). The steps of the ladder keep going up: A case study of hevruta as reflective pedagogy in two universities. In KaplanM.SilverN.Lavaque-MantyD.MeizlishD. (eds.), Using reflection and metacognition to improve student learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy (pp. 104–121). Stylus Publishing.
58.
Wulff-RisnerL.StewartB. (1997). Using experiential learning to teach evaluation skills. Journal of Agricultural Education,38(3), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1997.03043
59.
YanceyK. B.GrazianoL.LeeR.O’MalleyJ. (2013). Reflection, ePortfolios, and WEPO: A reflective account of new practices in a new curriculum. In KaplanM.SilverN.Lavaque-MantyD.MeizlishD. (eds.), Using reflection and metacognition to improve student learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy (pp. 175–202). Stylus Publishing.
60.
ZullJ. E. (2002). The art of changing the brain: Enriching the practice of teaching by exploring the biology of learning. Stylus Publishing.
